Optimizing E. coli Responsiveness to Acrylamide for Future Food Detection Applications
Maryam Ganjavi1,3* and Yangming Martin Lo2,3
1Nutritional Sciences Program, Department of Public and Allied Health, School of Community Health and Policy, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, USA
2Institute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
3Department of Nutrition and Food Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
*Corresponding Author: Maryam Ganjavi, Nutritional Sciences Program, Department of Public and Allied Health, School of Community Health and Policy, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Received:
March 17, 2025; Published: March 26, 2025
Abstract
The presence of acrylamide in carbohydrate-rich foods processed at high temperatures was first highlighted by the Swedish National Food Authority in April 2002, sparking extensive research into its occurrence, chemistry, toxicology, and potential health risks. This study investigates the potential of whole-cell bioluminescence as a sensitive and reliable alternative to conventional analytical methods for detecting acrylamide and assessing cellular stress responses. We employed two genetically engineered bioluminescent E. coli strains, recA-lux fusion and grpE-lux fusion, which carry DNA damage and protein damage stress-responsive promoters fused to the Photorhabdus luminesces luxCDABE reporter, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that both strains emitted detectable bioluminescence in response to acrylamide, with significant increases in ΔRLU values and RLU ratios observed between 10 and 1000 μg/L acrylamide. Notably, at higher concentrations (10,000 μg/L), luminescence diminished (ΔRLU negative, RLU ratio < 1), indicating cell dampening. The study also showed that E. coli cultures up to 14 days old responded similarly to fresh overnight cultures, highlighting the stability and reliability of the biosensor over time. These results suggest that bioluminescence-based stress fingerprinting is a powerful method for detecting acrylamide across a wide concentration range. The sustained responsiveness of aged sensing cells underscores the potential for long-term monitoring applications, positioning this biosensing approach as a robust tool for food safety and toxicology studies.
Keywords: Acrylamide; Luminous Bacteria; Biosensor; E. coli; Cell Age; Dose Response
References
- Tareke E., et al. “Analysis of acrylamide, a carcinogen formed in heated foodstuffs”. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry17 (2002): 4998-5006.
- Mottram DS., et al. “Acrylamide is formed in the Maillard reaction”. Nature 6906 (2002): 448-449.
- Bounegru AV and Bounegru I. “Acrylamide in food products and the role of electrochemical biosensors in its detection: a comprehensive review”. Analytical Methods (2024).
- Ganjavi M and Lo YM. “Identification of Stress Fingerprints Induced by Acrylamide, a Toxic Contaminant in Starchy Food Products, Using Bacterial Bioluminescence”. Acta Scientific Nutritional Health 4 (2025): 3-7.
- Friedberg EC., et al. “DNA repair: from molecular mechanism to human disease”. DNA Repair8 (2006): 986-996.
- Maslowska KH., et al. “The SOS system: A complex and tightly regulated response to DNA damage”. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 4 (2019): 368-384.
- Wiktor J., et al. “RecA finds homologous DNA by reduced dimensionality search”. Nature7876 (2021): 426-429.
- Jiang B., et al. “The influence of carbon sources on the expression of the recA gene and genotoxicity detection by an Acinetobacter bioreporter”. Environmental Science: Processes and Impacts4 (2015): 835-843.
- Vollmer AC., et al. “Detection of DNA damage by use of Escherichia coli carrying recA':: lux, uvrA':: lux, or alkA':: lux reporter plasmids”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology7 (1977): 2566-2571.
- Yang Y., et al. “Escherichia coli BW25113 competent cells prepared using a simple chemical method have unmatched transformation and cloning efficiencies”. Frontiers in Microbiology 13 (2022): 838698.
- Ronholm J. “Game changer-Next generation sequencing and its impact on food microbiology”. Frontiers Media SA (2018): 363.
- Jenkins D., et al. “Starvation-induced cross protection against heat or H2O2 challenge in Escherichia coli”. Journal of Bacteriology9 (1988): 3910-3914.
- Bock GM. “Evaluation of Toxic Effects Caused by Pesticides in Escherichia coli Using Recombinant Bioluminescent Bacteria”. Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology3 (2004): 295-305.
- Hagymasi AT., et al. “Heat‐shock proteins”. Current Protocols11 (2022): e592.
- Hu C., et al. “Heat shock proteins: Biological functions, pathological roles, and therapeutic opportunities”. MedComm3 (2022): e161.
- VanBogelen RA., et al. “Induction of the heat shock regulon does not produce thermotolerance in Escherichia coli”. Genes and Development6 (1987): 525-531.
- Sato R., et al. “Engineering Escherichia coli for direct production of 1, 2-propanediol and 1, 3-propanediol from starch”. Current Microbiology 77 (2020): 3704-3710.
- Yu C., et al. “Structural basis of substrate recognition and thermal protection by a small heat shock protein”. Nature communications1 (2021): 3007.
- Blom A., et al. “Unique and overlapping pollutant stress proteins of Escherichia coli”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1 (1992): 331-334.
- Yusof NA., et al. “Can heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) serve as biomarkers in Antarctica for future ocean acidification, warming and salinity stress?” Polar Biology3 (2022): 371-394.
- Fukushima K. “Bioactivity of ephedra: Integrating cytotoxicity assessment with real-time biosensing”. College Park: University of Maryland (2004).
Citation
Copyright