Acta Scientific Nutritional Health (ASNH)(ISSN: 2582-1423)

Research Article Volume 5 Issue 8

Evaluation of Market Demand for Alternative Poultry Feeds in Nigeria

OKO E.C1, AHAOTU E.O2 and Lawal M3*

1Department of Agricultural Technology, Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Unwana – Afikpo, Ebonyi State, Nigeria
2Department of Animal Production and Health Technology, Imo State Polytechnic Umuagwo, Nigeria
3Department of Agricultural Education, Federal College of Education Katsina, Katsina State, Nigeria

*Corresponding Author: OKO E.C, Department of Agricultural Technology, Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Unwana – Afikpo, Ebonyi State, Nigeria. E-mail: emmaocy150@protonmail.om

Received: June 16, 2021; Published: July 21, 2021

Abstract

Feeds constitute 70% of the cost of poultry production and of this, proteins constitute the highest cost. Finding cheaper alternatives to existing protein sources would improve efficiency of poultry production. Development and promotion of insect protein- based poultry feeds is assessed. It was observed that insect-based protein sources could significantly supplement cum replace fish meal which is the major source of feed protein. The market for conventional protein was expected to switch from fish to complete substitution with insect sources. The study main objective was to analyse demand, market size and trends of current conventional and sources of poultry feed proteins in Nigeria and make projections. The study was conducted in Imo, Edo and Kano states, Nigeria. The bulk of data was from secondary sources and primary data from formal survey of farmers and poultry value chain actors. Aggregate demand for insect feed ingredients for poultry feed was 5382 metric tons on dry matter basis at 50% rate of substitution of conventional protein. Projected demand for poultry feed proteins was 11,550 metric tons in the next 5 years. Insects had a strong potential for incorporation into poultry feeds.

Keywords:Consumer Tastes; Edible Insects; Protein Feed Substitutability; Fish; Soya Beans

References

  1. Lee JJY., et al. “Ten-year absolute fracture risk and hip bone strength in Canadian women with systemic lupus Erythematosus”. Journal of Rheumatology 39 (2012): 1378-1384.
  2. Nelson HD., et al. “Screening for osteoporosis: an update for the U.S. preventive services task force”. Annals of Internal Medicine 153 (2010): W. 43.
  3. Compston J. “Osteoporosis: social and economic impact”. Radiologic Clinics of North America 48 (2010): 477-482.
  4. Mariconda M., et al. “Factors predicting mobility and the change in activities of daily living after hip fracture: a 1-year prospective cohort study”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 30 (2016): 71-77.
  5. Travison T., et al. “Accounting for racial/ethnic variation in bone mineral content and density: the competing influences of socioeconomic factors, body composition, health and lifestyle, and circulating androgens and estrogens”. Osteoporosis International 22 (2011): 2645-2654.
  6. Navarro MC., et al. “Osteoporosis and metabolic syndrome according to socio-economic status, contribution of PTH, vitamin D and body weight: the Canarian osteoporosis poverty study (COPS)”. Clinical Endocrinology 78 (2013): 681-686.
  7. Kim SW., et al. “Association between household size, residential area, and osteoporosis: analysis of 2008 to 2011 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey”. Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 31 (2016): 712-721.
  8. Øyen J., et al. “Low-energy distal radius fractures in middle-aged and elderly women-seasonal variations, prevalence of osteoporosis, and associates with fractures”. Osteoporosis International 21 (2010): 1247-1255.
  9. Vestergaard P., et al. “Socioeconomic aspects of fractures within universal public healthcare: a nationwide case-control study from Denmark”. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 34 (2006): 371-377.
  10. Korpelainen R., et al. “Lifelong risk factors for osteoporosis and fractures in elderly women with low body mass index--a population-based study”. Bone 39 (2006): 385-391.
  11. Nabipour I., et al. “Socioeconomic status and bone health in community-dwelling older men: the CHAMP Study”. Osteoporosis International 22 (2011): 1343-1353.
  12. Wang S., et al. “Social and behavior factors related to aged Chinese women with osteoporosis”. Gynecology and Endocrinology 24 (2008): 538-545.
  13. Kumar A., et al. “Impact of dietary intake, education, and physical activity on bone mineral density among north Indian women”. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 28 (2010): 192-201.
  14. Shin CS., et al. “Prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis in Korea: a community-based cohort study with lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density”. Bone 47 (2010): 378-387.
  15. Hsieh C-H., et al. “Factors influencing osteoporosis preventive behaviours: testing a path model”. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62 (2008): 336-345.
  16. Brennan SL., et al. “Association between socioeconomic status and bone mineral density in adults: a systematic review”. Osteoporosis International 22 (2011): 517-527.
  17. Castro-Lionard K., et al. “Use of calcium supplements, vitamin D supplements and specific osteoporosis drugs among French women aged 75-85 years: patterns of use and associated factors”. Drugs Aging 30 (2013): 1029-1038.
  18. Arnarson A., et al. “Changes in body composition and use of blood cholesterol lowering drugs predict changes in blood lipids during 12 weeks of resistance exercise training in old adults”. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 26 (2014): 287-292.
  19. Geirsdottir OG., et al. “Physical function predicts improvement in quality of life in elderly Icelanders after 12 weeks of resistance exercise”. The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging 16 (2012): 62-66.
  20. Ramel A., et al. “C-Reactive Protein and Resistance Exercise in Community Dwelling Old Adults”. The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging 19 (2015): 792-796.
  21. Folstein MF., et al. “A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician”. Journal of Psychiatry Research 12 (1975): 189-198.
  22. Geirsdottir OG., et al. “Effect of 12-Week Resistance Exercise Program on Body Composition, Muscle Strength, Physical Function, and Glucose Metabolism in Healthy, Insulin-Resistant, and Diabetic Elderly Icelanders”. The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences 67 (2012): 1259-1265.
  23. “ATS Statement. Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test”. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 166 (2002): 111-117.
  24. Martínez-González MA., et al. “Prevalence of physical activity during leisure time in the European Union”. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 33 (2001): 1142-1146.
  25. Ainsworth BE., et al. “Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities”. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2 (2000): s498-s504.
  26. Paffenbarger RS., et al. “Paffenbarger physical activity questionnaire”. American Journals of Epidemiology 108 (1978): 161-175.
  27. Eymundsdottir H., et al. “Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D, physical activity and cognitive function among older adults”. Journal of Aging Research 7 (2018): 143-148.
  28. Ramel A., et al. “Vitamin D deficiency and nutritional status in elderly hospitalized subjects in Iceland”. Public Health Nutrition7 (2009): 1001-1005.
  29. Ljungvall A., et al. “Misreporting and misclassification: implications for socioeconomic disparities in body-mass index and obesity”. The European Journal of Health Economics 16 (2015): 5-20.
  30. Robles TF., et al. “Marital quality and health: a meta-analytic review”. Psychology Bulletin 140 (2014): 140-187.
  31. Kiecolt-Glaser JK and Newton TL. “Marriage and health: his and hers”. Psychology Bulletin 127 (2001): 472-503.
  32. Hawkley LC and Cacioppo JT. “Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms”. Annals of Behavioral Medicine's 40 (2010): 218-227.

Citation

Citation: OKO E.C., et al. “Evaluation of Market Demand for Alternative Poultry Feeds in Nigeria".Acta Scientific Nutritional Health 5.8 (2021): 36-43.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2021 OKO E.C., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.034

Indexed In





News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is December 15, 2021.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US