Acta Scientific Women's Health (ASWH)(ISSN: 2582-3205)

Research Article Volume 5 Issue 7

Mentees’ Perspectives on the Factors that Influence the Choice of Mentors in the Medical Profession

Achor Mike Tochi1, Briggs Datonye Christopher2, Diamond Tamunokuro Ezekiel3* and Anochie Ifeoma4

1Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Nigeria
2Department of Paediatrics, Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria
3Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Nigeria
4Department of Paediatrics, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Nigeria

*Corresponding Author: Diamond Tamunokuro Ezekiel, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

Received: July 13, 2022; Published: June 30, 2023

Abstract

Introduction: Mentorship is an age-long act in most fields of learning. It plays a pivotal role in medical education. The strength of any mentorship relationship could have a direct bearing on the character traits of the mentor. We aimed to determine factors which influence the choice of mentors among potential mentees in a formal mentorship relationship among medical doctors in Rivers State, Nigeria.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey from randomly selected potential mentees. A semi-structured questionnaire was distributed via a monkey survey. The tool had sections which addressed mentees' expectations, perceived factors that influence the choice of mentors and ways to improve the mentors-mentees relationship answerable using a 5-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed.

Results: Of the 162 mentees recruited, 95 (58.6%) were females. The predominant age group was 31-40 years (40.1%). Majority, 137 (84.6%), practised in public hospitals, and 102 (63%) were non-specialist doctors. The most common factor that influences the choice of mentors as cited by 156 (96.3%) was “mentors should be able to help mentees advance in their fields and connect them to opportunities they may not have access to”. The two most commonly cited areas of interest for mentorship were leadership in health organizations and research. Over 90% of mentees agreed some roles of effective mentors are discussing possible solutions to difficult issues, identifying opportunities and sharing personal experiences.

Conclusions: Mentorship enables targeted development of mentees. When developing mentoring programs and evaluating mentors, it is important to consider mentees' opinions on the factors that impact their choice of mentors.

Keywords: Mentor; Mentee; Mentorship; Doctors; Nigeria

References

  1. Sambunjak D., et al. “Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review”. JAMA 9 (2006): 1103-1115.
  2. Buddeberg-Fischer B and Herta KD. “Formal mentoring programmes for medical students and doctors--a review of the Medline literature”. Medical Teacher 3 (2006): 248-257.
  3. Overeem K., et al. “Doctors’ perceptions of why 360-degree feedback does (not) work: a qualitative study”. Medical Education9 (2006): 874-882.
  4. van Schaik S., et al. “Promoting self-directed learning through portfolios in undergraduate medical education: The mentors’ perspective”. Medical Teacher2 (2013): 139-144.
  5. Connor MP., et al. “Developing senior doctors as mentors: a form of continuing professional development. Report Of an initiative to develop a network of senior doctors as mentors: 1994-99”. Medical Education9 (2000): 747-753.
  6. Long J. “The dark side of mentoring”. Australian Educational Researcher 2 (1997): 115-133.
  7. Ughasoro M., et al. “Barriers and solutions to effective mentorship in health research and training institutions in Nigeria: Mentors, mentees, and organizational perspectives”. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice 3 (2022): 215.
  8. Buowari D and Ebirim L. “Mentoring: A Survey of Resident Doctors in a Developing Country”. Yenagoa Medical Journal 1 (2021).
  9. Iloh GP., et al. “Mentoring in a resource-constrained context: A single-institutional cross-sectional study of the prevalence, benefits, barriers and predictors among post-graduate medical college fellows and members in South-Eastern Nigeria”. Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal 1 (2019): 38.
  10. Olorunmoteni O., et al. “Mentoring practices and needs of paediatric resident doctors in Nigerian training institutions”. Nigerian Journal of Health Science 19 (2019): 73-80.
  11. Akinmokun OI., et al. “Mentorship in orthopaedic and trauma residency training programme in Nigeria: the residents’ perspective”. Nigerian Journal of Medicine2 (2016): 134-141.
  12. Rivers (State, Nigeria) - Population Statistics, Charts, Map and Location (2022).
  13. Plyley T., et al. “A survey of mentor gender preferences amongst anesthesiology residents at the University of British Columbia”. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 3 (2019): 342-343.
  14. Osaghae DO. “Mentoring in the medical profession: An overview”. Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Research 11 (2012): 5-8.
  15. Cho CS., et al. “Defining the Ideal Qualities of Mentorship: A Qualitative Analysis of the Characteristics of Outstanding Mentors”. The American Journal of Medicine5 (2011): 453-458.
  16. Faucett EA., et al. “The role of same-sex mentorship and organizational support in encouraging women to pursue surgery”. The American Journal of Surgery4 (2017): 640-644.
  17. Kosoko-Lasaki O., et al. “Mentoring for women and underrepresented minority faculty and students: experience at two institutions of higher education”. Journal of the National Medical Association 9 (2006): 1449-1459.
  18. Holmes DR., et al. “Effective Attributes of Mentoring in the Current Era”. Circulation5 (2018): 455-457.

Citation

Citation: Diamond Tamunokuro Ezekiel., et al. “Mentees’ Perspectives on the Factors that Influence the Choice of Mentors in the Medical Profession". Acta Scientific Women's Health 5.7 (2023): 28-34.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Diamond Tamunokuro Ezekiel., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate35%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In





News and Events


Contact US