Acta Scientific Women's Health (ASWH)(ISSN: 2582-3205)

Research Article Volume 2 Issue 11

Improving Handwashing Promotion and Practice in Emergency Contexts: Evaluating Two Novel Approaches in Nduta Camp, Tanzania

Foyeke Tolani1*, Betty Ojeny1, Michelle Ping-Lee D’Amico2, Loveness Raphael1, Liz Barker3 and Jamae Fontain Morris2

1Oxfam, Oxford, UK
2Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
3The Behavioural Architects, UK

*Corresponding Author: Foyeke Tolani, Oxfam, Oxford, UK.

Received: September 03, 2020; Published: October 28, 2020

×

Abstract

Background: Handwashing with soap can disrupt the transmission of diarrhea-causing pathogens, a major cause of morbidity in emergency settings. However, evidence that traditional hygiene promotion activities drive sustained increases in handwashing is weak. We aimed to test: 1) an improved handwashing station and whether it increased handwashing and 2) if pairing improved stations with a behavioral intervention based on emotional drivers further increased handwashing.

Methods: We conducted a three-arm clustered randomized controlled trial in Nduta refugee camp, Tanzania, enrolling all households in each intervention arm using systematic sampling. One arm was given access to the Promotion and Practice Handwashing Kit (PPHWK), a kit designed by Oxfam and partners. The second arm had access to the PPHWK and a behavioral intervention-Mum’s Magic Hands (MMH), a handwashing promotion strategy based on emotive drivers, with mothers and female carers as primary target group. The third arm was the control group. Baseline and endline data were collected using surveys, focus group discussions (FGDs), structured and qualitative observations.

Results: At endline, all intervention households were more likely to note the importance of handwashing. In structured observations, persons from PPHWK+MMH households practiced handwashing more consistently 94.3%, compared with 78.0% in PPHWK only and 69.6% in control. PPHWK+MMH households self-reported significantly lower rates of diarrhea at endline than baseline p = 0.025. FGD participants preferred the PPHWK over alternative handwashing stations (tippy taps), citing good design, durability, and ease of use. All participants exposed to MMH considered it effective, with a reported increase in handwashing with soap, particularly among children.

Conclusion: We found substantial improvements in both reported and observed handwashing with soap associated with PPHWK access, especially when paired with MMH. Pairing an improved handwashing station with innovative promotion strategies may significantly improve handwashing and subsequently reduce morbidity among refugee populations. Feedback on the PPHWK and MMH were used to develop a new PPHWK prototype and improve on MMH approach of targeting mothers and other household members.

Keywords: Emergency Contexts; Emotional Drivers; Environmental Cues; Handwashing Stations; Handwashing with Soap; WASH; Refugee Camp; Tanzania; Mothers in Refugee Context

×

References

  1. Hulland RS., et al. “Designing a handwashing station for infrastructure-restricted communities in Bangladesh using the integrated behavioral model for water, sanitation and hygiene interventions (IBM-WASH)”. BMC Public Health 13 (2013): 877K.
  2. Hershey CL., et al. “Incidence and risk factors for malaria, pneumonia and diarrhea in children under 5 in UNHCR refugee camps: A retrospective study”. Conflict and Health1 (2011): 24.
  3. Peterson E., et al. “The effect of soap distribution on diarrhoea: Nyamithuthu refugee camp”. International Journal of Epidemiology 27 (1998): 520.
  4. Veerapu N., et al. “Promotion of sanitation and hygiene in a rural area of South India: A community-based study”. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 5 (2016): 587-592.
  5. Mahamud AS., et al. “Epidemic cholera in Kakuma Refugee Camp, Kenya, 2009: the importance of sanitation and soap”. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries 3 (2012): 234-241.
  6. Aiello AE., et al. “Effect of hand hygiene on infectious disease risk in the community setting: a meta-analysis”. American Journal of Public Health8 (2008): 1372-1381.
  7. Freeman M., et al. “Systematic Review: Hygiene and health: systematic review of handwashing practices worldwide and update of health effects”. Tropical Medicine and International Health8 (2014): 906-916.
  8. Curtis V and Cairncross S. “Effect of washing hands with soap on diarrhoea risk in the community: a systematic review”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases5 (2003): 275-281.
  9. Cairncross S., et al. “Water, sanitation and hygiene for the prevention of diarrhea”. International Journal of Epidemiology 39 (2010): i193-205.
  10. Jenkins MW., et al. “Opportunities to improve domestic hygiene practices through new enabling products: A study of handwashing practices and equipment in rural Cambodia”. International Health4 (2013): 295-301.
  11. Biran A., et al. “Hygiene and sanitation practices amongst residents of three long-term refugee camps in Thailand, Ethiopia and Kenya”. Tropical Medicine and International Health9 (2012): 1133-1141.
  12. Biran AP., et al. “Effect of a behaviour-change intervention on handwashing with soap in India (SuperAmma): a cluster-randomised trial”. Lancet Global Health3 (2014): E145-E154.
  13. Phillips RM., et al. “Soap is not enough: handwashing practices and knowledge in refugee camps, Maban County, South Sudan”. Conflict and Health39 (2015): 1-8.
  14. Greenland K., et al. “Multiple behaviour change intervention for diarrhoea control in Lusaka, Zambia: a cluster randomised trial”. The Lancet Global Health 4 (2016): e966-e977.
  15. Greenland K., et al. “Disentangling the effects of a multiple behaviour change intervention for diarrhoea control in Zambia: a theory-based process evaluation”. Globalization and Health1 (2017): 78.
  16. Rutter D and Quine L. “Social cognition models and changing health behaviours”. In: Rutter D, Quine L, eds. Changing Health Behaviour. Buckingham: Open University Press (2002): 1-27.
  17. Curtis V., et al. “Evidence of behaviour change following a hygiene promotion programme in Burkina Faso”. Bulletin of the World Health Organization6 (2001): 518.
  18. UNHCR Tanzania. Nduta Refugee Camp Situation 3RP Key Indicators Monitoring (2017).
  19. Sagan S and Tolani F. “Using emotional and health motivators to promote handwashing with soap among mothers: Pilot of Mum’s Magic Hands in Nepal post-earthquake emergency”. Oxfam report. October (2016).
  20. Burundian Refugee Voluntary Repatriation Operation (2018).
  21. Vujcic J., et al. “Handwashing promotion in humanitarian emergencies: strategies and challenges according to experts”. Journal of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene for Development4 (2015): 574-585.
×

Citation

Citation: Foyeke Tolani., et al. “Improving Handwashing Promotion and Practice in Emergency Contexts: Evaluating Two Novel Approaches in Nduta Camp, Tanzania". Acta Scientific Women's Health 2.11 (2020): 25-36.




Metrics

Acceptance rate35%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor0.539

Indexed In





News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is May 20, 2021.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US