Dibyajyoti Deka1, Mangala Lahkar1, Himadri Sekhar Dasgupta2, Dhriti KR Brahma2* and Tirtha Chaliha1
1Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, India
2North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences (NEIGRIHMS), Shillong, India
*Corresponding Author: Dhriti KR Brahma, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences (NEIGRIHMS), Shillong, India.
Received: May 08, 2021; Published: July 19, 2021
Moringa oleifera Linn., a fast growing, drought resistant tree, is widely grown in Indian subcontinent and South Asia. The leaves of this tree have immense nutritional value. It is conventionally used by the people of the region as a traditional cure of many ailments including gastric ulcer. Diverge groups of Wistar rats belonging to different sexes were treated with pyloric ligation and by cold and restraint stress for induction of ulcer experimentally. The induced animals were treated with aqueous extracts of fresh leaves of Moringa oleifera (MOL) in the doses of 200 mg and 400 mg per kg as anti-ulcer cure and were compared with standard anti-ulcer drug Ranitidine. The study revealed the antiulcer activity of aqueous extract of leaves of MOL in animal models of pyloric ligation and cold restraint induced gastric ulcers. The ulcer protection in ranitidine group was 64.12% against the groups treated with MOL in doses of 200 and 400 mg/kg was 45.2% and 50.07%, respectively. The acute toxicity study by the administration of doses of MOL up to 2000 mg/kg in the above for a period of 14 days did not show any acute toxicity. The satisfactory evidence of antiulcer activity of MOL extract suggests the necessity of further advanced scientific study for testing its usefulness in human.
Keywords: Moringa oleifera Linn.; Gastric Ulcer; Antiulcer Activity
Peptic ulcer is associated with acute or chronic inflammation and is the most common gastrointestinal disorder in clinical practice around the world and is caused mostly by damage to mucosal lining of stomach or duodenum. Imbalance between the protective factors and acid secretion may substantially contribute its causation [1]. The incidence of peptic ulcer disease in the world is 1 to 1.9 per 1000 and the prevalence based on physician diagnosis is 0.12-1.50% [2]. Though several antiulcer drugs are available which reduce acid secretion, enhance gastric protection, prevent apoptosis or incite epithelial cell proliferation for healing, multiple adverse reactions and high rate of relapses are known with the use of such conventional drugs [3]. The potential natural drugs may cause lesser adverse reactions or to a minimum extent.
The earlier reports revealed that nature of food consumed like spicy food, food containing caffeine etc. incite gastric acid secretion in the stomach [4] and makes vulnerable to ulcer. Surprisingly, the people of south Asian countries suffer less due to duodenal ulcer and it was revealed that they frequently consume leaves of Moringa oleifera Linn. (Moringaceae) as a preventive measure which is speculated to protect against ulcers [5]. Moringa oleifera, a drought-resistant tree belonging to the family Moringaceae, subclass Dilleniidae and family Moringaceae, is native to the Indian subcontinent. The common names of the plant include moringa, drumstick tree, horseradish tree, and ben oil tree or benzolive tree. Several reports [6,7] [8] stated that origin of the tree is from the northern India. More specifically, wild habitat of Moringa oleifera stands only in hilly lowlands of north western India and thus is the actual centre of origin [9]. This is one of the fast growing, evergreen, deciduous medium sized perennial tree of about 10 m to 12 m height. Moringa oleifera is rich in fairly unique group of phytochemicals, glucosinolates and isothiocyanates [10,11]. Moringa oleifera leaves contain high quantity of vitamin A, calcium, iron, vitamin C and potassium and protein which are of better quality than milk and eggs [11-13]. Different parts of this plant have been used as foods as well as medicinal purposes. Traditionally, M. oleifera leaves are used to treat many ailments, such as nervous debility, paralysis, asthma, diabetes, blood pressure, diarrhoea, infection and ulcer [14,15] and anti-ulcer properties [16,17]. Moringa has been reported to possess all powerful anti-oxidants that help in the detoxification of harmful compounds in the body. The flower bud of Moringa pteygosperma Linn., a synonym of Moringa oleifera Linn., widely consumed in Pakistan, was reported to possess antiulcer activity against aspirin-induced gastric ulcers in rats [18].
The study was carried out in the Department of Pharmacology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati after getting necessary approval from the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati with CPCSEA Registration No. 351: 03/01/2001 and study protocol approval No. MC/05/2015/88).
The experiment was conducted with 54 Wistar rats of either sex having the weight in the range of 150-250 grams. All the animals were kept in the Animal House of our Institute, in a clean area. The temperature was maintained at 24 ± 2°C, with relative humidity of 30 - 70%, with alternate light and dark cycle of 12 hours. Six rats were kept in a polypropylene cage during the study. Cages had a stainless-steel top grill having facilities for food and drinking water in polypropylene bottles with stainless steel sipper tube. Standard rat pellet feed and pure drinking water were provided ad libitum. Maintenance of the study animals was done strictly following the CPCSEA guidelines.
MaterialsDrugs and chemicals: (1) Ranitidine (2) Aqueous extract of Moringa oleifera (3) Normal Saline (0.9% NaCl) (4) Topfer Reagent (5) 0.1 N NaOH solution (6) Phenolphthalein solution
Plant materialFresh leaves of MOL were collected from botanical garden in the month of September, 2016. Authentication and verification of the plants were done by Dr. Gajendra Sharma, Department of Botany, Gauhati university.
Preparation of aqueous extractThe leaves were thoroughly washed and shade dried, grinded into fine powders and were kept in air tight containers. The soxhlet apparatus was used for extraction. The resultant extracts were filtered using Whatman filter paper no. 1, concentrated by evaporation and collected in petri dishes. The final yield of MOL leaf extracts were 66.3 grams (26.5%), stored in a refrigerator at 4°C in air tight containers.
Acute toxicity tests [19]This was carried out as per OECD guidelines. The rats were randomly selected, marked for identification, and kept in their cages for seven days prior to dosing. Animals were fasted prior to dosing (food was withheld for 3 - 4 hours). The dose was calculated according to the fasted body weight. Post fasting, the first animal was dosed at 175 mg/kg body weight with aqueous extract of study drug by gavage. Food was withheld for a further 1 - 2 hours. The animal was observed for mortality for 48 hours. Then a second animal was dosed at 550 mg/kg body weight by the same process. Again after 48 hours a third animal was dosed at 2000 mg/kg and observed for the next 48 hours for mortality. All the above animals were observed for a period of 14 days and were found to be alive at 2000 mg/kg. Two doses of the study drug were selected i.e. 200 mg/kg, and 400 mg/kg.
Study groupsThe study had 2 experimental models.
For each model, 5 groups of 6 animals each were selected. Group I (Normal control) served as a common for both models. Thus, for both models, a total of 54 animals were taken, detailed as follows [22,23].
Groups |
Group code |
Treatment given |
Normal Control |
NC |
No induction or intervention given |
Disease Control |
DC |
Normal saline 1 ml/kg |
Standard |
R20 |
Ranitidine 20 mg/kg |
Moringa oleifera aqueous extract low dose |
AEMK200 |
Moringa oleifera aqueous extract 200 mg/kg |
Moringa oleifera aqueous extract high dose |
AEMK400 |
Moringa oleifera aqueous extract 400 mg/kg |
Table 1
Duration and route of drug administration: All study drugs were administered orally for 7 days, using an oral feeding tube for rats.
Study procedureFollowing variables were measured in both models in the study:
The ulcers were evaluated quantitatively using ulcer index and scoring number [26]. Percentage ulcer protection was also calculated. Volume, pH, free and total acidities of gastric content was determined. Titration was done with 0.01N NaOH, till total acidity was achieved.
Histopathological examinationStomach tissues were fixed in 10% formalin for 24 hrs, and then embedded in paraffin. Small sections were made (3 - 5 µm) and stained with H&E dye and examined under light microscopy.
Statistical analysis:
Groups |
Ulcer index |
Volume of gastric juice (ml) |
Ph of gastric juice
|
Free acidity of gastric contents |
Total acidity
|
Statistical
|
P value |
Interpretation |
NC |
0 |
1.14 ± 0.13 |
3.08 ± 0.11 |
10.02 ± 0.24 |
18.47 ± 0.38 |
One way ANOVA |
P < 0.001 |
The mean ulcer index, volume of gastric juice, ph of gastric juice, free acidity and total acidity of gastric juice between the groups was significantly different |
DC |
4.38 ± 0.43 |
3.31 ± 0.34 |
1.81 ± 0.09 |
30.94 ± 1.56 |
42.86 ± 0.58 |
|||
R20 |
1.57 ± 0.32 |
2.45 ± 0.27 |
3.26 ± 0.11 |
11.48 ± 0.4 |
24.34 ± 1.09 |
|||
AEMK200 |
2.4 ± 0.44 |
3.23 ± 0.14 |
2.54 ± 0.22 |
19.35 ± 0.64 |
32.6 ± 0.58 |
|||
AEMK400 |
2.19 ± 0.37 |
2.96±0.11 |
3.12 ± 0.09 |
16.28 ± 0.39 |
28.14 ± 0.88 |
Table 2: Pyloric ligation model.
Effect on ulcer index, volume of gastric juice, Ph of gastric juice, free acidity of gastric juice and total acidity.
Group 1 |
Group 2 |
Ulcer index |
Volume of gastric juice |
Ph of gastric juice |
Free acidity |
Total acidity |
|||||
|
|
P value |
Interpretation |
P value |
Interpretation |
P value |
interpretation |
P value |
Interpretation |
P value |
Interpretation |
NC |
DC |
<0.001 |
The mean ulcer index in the other groups was significantly higher than the NC group |
<0.001 |
The mean gastric juice volume in the other groups was significantly higher than the NC group |
<0.001 |
The mean pH was significantly lower in the DC, AEMK200 group than NC, while it was comparable with NC group in R20, and AEMK400 groups |
<0.001 |
The mean free acidity in DC, R20, AEMK200, AEMK400 groups was significantly higher than the NC group |
<0.001 |
The mean total acidity in DC, R20, AEMK200, AEMK400 groups was significantly higher than the NC group |
R20 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
0.309 |
0.019 |
<0.001 |
||||||
AEMK 200 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
||||||
AEMK 400 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
0.998 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
||||||
DC |
R20 |
<0.001 |
The mean ulcer index in R20, AEMK200, AEMK400 groups was significantly lower than the DC group |
<0.001 |
The mean gastric juice volume was significantly lower in the R20, AEMK400 group than DC group, while it was comparable with DC group in AEMK200 groups |
<0.001 |
The mean pH in R20, AEMK200, AEMK400 groups was significantly higher than the DC group |
<0.001 |
The mean free acidity in R20, AEMK200, AEMK400 groups was significantly lower than the DC group |
<0.001 |
The mean total acidity in R20, AEMK200, AEMK400 groups was significantly lower than the DC group |
AEMK200 |
<0.001 |
0.990 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
||||||
AEMK400 |
<0.001 |
0.042 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
||||||
R20 |
AEMK200 |
0.002 |
The mean ulcer index in AEMK200 groups was significantly higher than the R20 group, while it was comparable with R20 group in AEMK400groups |
<0.001 |
The mean gastric juice volume was significantly higher in the AEMK200, AEMK400 than R20 group |
<0.001 |
The mean pH in R20, AEMK200 groups was significantly lower than the R20 group, while it was comparable with R20 group in AEMK400 |
<0.001 |
The mean free acidity in AEMK200, AEMK400 groups was significantly higher than the R20 group |
<0.001 |
The mean total acidity in AEMK200, AEMK400 groups was significantly higher than the R20 group |
AEMK400 |
0.041 |
0.001 |
0.638 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
||||||
AEMK200 |
AEMK400 |
0.920 |
Mean ulcer index was comparable between AEMK200 and AEMK400 groups |
0.200 |
Mean gastric juice volume was comparable between AEMK200 and AEMK400 groups |
<0.001 |
Mean pH was significantly higher in AEMK400 group than AEMK200 group |
<0.001 |
Mean free acidity was significantly lower in AEMK400 group than AEMK200 group |
<0.001 |
Mean total acidity was significantly lower in AEMK400 group than AEMK200 group |
Table 3: Post hoc analysis using Tukey’s test.
Groups |
Percentage of ulcer protection compared to disease control |
|
|
Pyloric ligation method |
Cold restraint method |
NC |
- |
- |
DC |
- |
- |
R20 |
64.12% |
67.9% |
AEMK200 |
45.2% |
47.49% |
AEMK400 |
50.07% |
54.82% |
Table 4: Percentage of ulcer protection.
Cold Restraint stress induced ulcer model
Groups |
Ulcer index |
Statistical test |
F distribution and P value |
Interpretation |
NC |
0 |
One way ANOVA |
F (6,35) = 139.8 P < 0.001 |
The mean ulcer index between the groups was significantly different. |
DC |
3.76 ± 0.44 |
|||
R20 |
1.21 ± 0.14 |
|||
AEMK200 |
1.97 ± 0.26 |
|||
AEMK400 |
1.7 ± 0.22 |
Table 5: Cold restraint model.
Group 1 |
Group 2 |
P value |
Interpretation |
NC |
DC R20 AEMK200 AEMK400 |
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 |
The mean ulcer index in DC, R20, AEMK200, AEMK400 groups was significantly higher than the NC group |
DC |
R20 AEMK200 AEMK400 |
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 |
The mean ulcer index in R20, AEMK200, AEMK400 groups was significantly lower than the DC group. |
R20 |
AEMK200 AEMK400 |
<0.001 0.013 |
The mean ulcer index in AEMK200, AEMK400 groups was significantly higher than the R20 group |
AEMK200 |
AEMK400 |
0.4 |
Mean ulcer index was comparable between AEMK200 and AEMK400 groups |
Table 6: Post hoc analysis using Tukey’s test.
The present study demonstrated the antiulcer activity of aqueous extract of leaves of MOL in animal models of pyloric ligation and cold restraint induced gastric ulcers. MOL leaf extract has demonstrated antiulcer activity in some animal studies. These plants are easily available throughout the country in abundance, thus, giving us the opportunity to develop a cheap and easily available alternative for management of peptic ulcers. Thus, these plants were chosen and their antiulcer efficacy was evaluated in comparison to that with ranitidine.
In the present study, induction of ulcer by pyloric ligation or cold restraint stress was seen in the disease control groups, which was evident from the increase in ulcer index in comparison to the normal control group. Other variables also differed significantly.
Pyloric ligation induced ulcer model findingsWith treatment by aqueous extract of MOL, the ulcer index was lower compared to the disease control group, but higher compared to ranitidine. Dose dependent effect was not observed. The ulcer protection was 50% at 400 mg/kg dose and 45.2% at 200 mg/kg dose. The gastric juice volume was lower at 400mg/kg dose compared to disease control group. Compared to ranitidine, at both doses the gastric volume was higher. The gastric pH was increased compared to disease control group. In comparison to ranitidine, only 400 mg/kg dose gave comparable results. pH was higher compared to 200 mg/kg dose, representing a dose dependent effect. The free and total acidity of gastric contents was reduced than disease control group, however, the effect was not comparable to the ranitidine group, and also a dose dependent effect was observed with better response at higher dose. These results revalidate the findings of some other previous studies [26-29].
Cold restraint stress induced ulcer model findingsThe ulcer index in the aqueous extract of MOL at both doses was lower than the disease control group, but was higher than ranitidine group, and similar at both doses. The ulcer protection provided was lower than that by ranitidine treatment at both doses.
From the findings of the study, it was evident that the aqueous extracts of leaves of MOL have antiulcer activity. This activity measured in terms of ulcer index and ulcer protection was evident compared to the disease control group. Ulcer protection was found to be more at higher doses compared to the lower doses. The pH, volume, free and total acidity represent secretory activity in the stomach. The effect on these variables demonstrated anti-secretory activity of the aqueous extract of MOL. Antiulcer activity of aqueous extract of Moringa oleifera leaves in the dose of 200 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg has been demonstrated in few studies. All the macroscopic and biochemical parameters showed significant antiulcer activity of Moringa oleifera. Study by Hamid., et al. [30] also showed significant anti-ulcer activity of Moringa oleifera aqueous extract like that of Rantidine, the positive control. Thus, the present study findings are in agreement with the previous studies evaluating the antiulcer activity of aqueous extract of leaves of MOL. However, the leaves contain numerous other phytoconstituents which have not yet been evaluated individually for their antiulcer potential.
The present study adds to the evidence of antiulcer efficacy of aqueous extracts of leaves of Moringa oleifera. Though not as efficacious as ranitidine, it is a promising agent possessing the potential antiulcer activity. Advanced research methodologies should be encouraged to identify and isolate the active phyto-constituents of the leaves of these native indigenous medicinal plants. The available evidence of antiulcer activity provides satisfactory evidence for further advanced studies with more pure and refined products for testing its efficacy in human. Development of compounds as antiulcer agents may have an additional advantage of being more cost effective.
Nothing to declare.
Citation: Dhriti KR Brahma., et al. “A Pharmacological Study of Gastric Antiulcer Activity of the Leaf Extracts of Moringa oleifera Linn". Acta Scientific Pharmaceutical Sciences 5.8 (2021): 43-50.
Copyright: © 2021 Dhriti KR Brahma., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.