Acta Scientific Ophthalmology (ISSN: 2582-3191)

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 3

Inverted ILM Flap Technique: Efficacy in Large Macular Hole Surgery (A Prospective Comparative Study of 70 Cases)

Mohamed Zidi, Salma Benbachir, Sarah Idmane, Fatine El Alami, Soukaina Amrani Joutei and Soukaina Homaide

Department of Ophthalmology, Nour Ophthalmology Clinic of Casablanca, Morocco

*Corresponding Author: Mohamed Zidi, Department of Ophthalmology, Nour Ophthalmology Clinic of Casablanca, Morocco.

Received: November 28, 2023; Published: March 12, 2024

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) technique for large macular holes (MHs) (> 400 μm) and to compare the anatomical and functional outcomes with the standard technique.

Material and Methods: Comparative prospective study on 70 cases separated into two groups, group 1 of 39 patients were operated with ILM peeling and in group 2, 31 eyes underwent a modification of the standard technique, called the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique.

Results: The mean age of patients was 60.4 years. Mean postoperative BCVA, patients in both groups showed a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity (p:0.37). The closure rate of macular hole was 98%. The diameter of macular holes varied between 400 - 1100 μm. DONFL were observed in 10 patients in group 1 versus 7 patients in group 2.

Conclusion: We observed that visual acuity improvement rate after reverse ILM technique was higher but the anatomical outcome for large MH was achieved using both techniques.

Keywords: Macular Hole Surgery; Inverted ILM Flap; ILM Flap

References

  1. Majumdar S and Tripathy K. “Macular Hole”. Updated 2021 Feb 14. In: StatPearls Internet. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing (2021).
  2. Michalewska Z., et al. “Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes”. Ophthalmology10 (2010): 2018-2025.
  3. Zhao PP., et al. “A Review of Surgical Outcomes and Advances for Macular Holes”. Journal of Ophthalmology (2018): 7389412.
  4. Kelly NE and Wendel RT. “Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Results of a pilot study”. Archives of Ophthalmology5 (1991): 654-659.
  5. Sebag J. “Anomalous posterior vitreous detachment: a unifying concept in vitreo-retinal disease”. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 8 (2004): 690-698.
  6. Michalewska Z., et al. “Temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus classic inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique: a Comparative Study”. Retina (2015).
  7. Sborgia G., et al. “Inverted internal limiting membrane-flap technique for large macular hole: a microperimetric study”. International Journal of Retina and Vitreous 5 (2019): 44.
  8. Narayanan R., et al. “Surgical outcomes after inverted internal limiting membrane flap versus conventional peeling for very large macular holes”. Retina8 (2019): 1465-1469.
  9. Shiode Y., et al. “The role of inverted internal limiting membrane flap in macular hole closure”. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 58 (2017): 4847-4855.
  10. Zongming Song., et al. “Viscoat Assisted Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique for Large Macular Holes Associated with High Myopia". Journal of Ophthalmology (2016).
  11. Shin MK., et al. “Perfluoro-n-octane-assisted single-layered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole surgery”. Retina 9 (2014): 1905-1910.
  12. Ramtohul P., et al. “Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular hole surgery: a comparative study”. BMC Ophthalmology 20 (2020): 11.
  13. Endre A Balazs., et al. “Studies on the structure of the vitreous body: VIII. Comparative biochemistry”. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics2 (1959): 464-479.
  14. Kuriyama S., et al. “Efficacy of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for the treatment of macular hole in high myopia”. American Journal of Ophthalmology1 (2013): 125-131.e1.
  15. Schumann RG., et al. “Idiopathic macular holes: ultrastructural aspects of surgical failure”. Retina 2 (2008): 340-349.
  16. Rizzo S., et al. “Internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted flap technique for treatment of full-thickness macular holes: a comparative study in a large series of patients”. Retina 38 (2018): S73-S78.
  17. Chatziralli IP., et al. “Internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery; why, when, and how?” Retina5 (2018): 870-882.

Citation

Citation: Mohamed Zidi. “Inverted ILM Flap Technique: Efficacy in Large Macular Hole Surgery (A Prospective Comparative Study of 70 Cases)".Acta Scientific Ophthalmology 7.4 (2024): 19-23.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Mohamed Zidi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate35%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
ISI- IF1.042
JCR- IF0.24

Indexed In




News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is December 25, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"

Contact US