Katta SV*

Retina Eye Clinic, Opposite Balaji Temple, Hyderabad, India

*Corresponding Author: Katta SV, Retina Eye Clinic, Opposite Balaji Temple, Hyderabad, India.

Received: August 01, 2023; Published: August 11, 2023

Abstract

Objective: All India Ophthalmology Society (AIOS) is the second largest society in the world registered under society act in the constitution of India. Being registered society, AIOS is bound to follow Indian Penal Codes (IPC). AIOS is teaching knowingly evidence based incorrect medical terms to the innocent younger generation without even mentioning misnomers and in turn making them habituated. Hence, AIOS is prone for grievance under article 226 (high court) and article 32 (Supreme Court) in the constitution of India. All global ophthalmology societies having been registered in their respective constitutions are prone for grievance in teaching and publishing incorrect medical terms as per their respective constitutional penal codes too. International Court of justice only deals with land disputes. That’s why Global Parliament is needed to arrest further addition of incorrect medical terms to literature and to execute evidence based medical terms to future generation. Historically Ophthalmology is noted for first medical specialty organization in 1864, first board examination in 1917, first antiviral agents, first homo transplants, first time photocoagulation, first time angiography and now trying to remove incorrect terms in literature -visionary to many specialties to follow.

Methods: Many incorrect medical terms like Retinoscopy, Retinal detachment, Phaco emulsification, Computer vision syndrome, Syringing etc., have been added over the years for which we are responsible. To resolve long pending issue of global unethical teaching concern, no other options are left for us to request them from whom we have learnt, to review literature. I brought to the notice issue of grievance prone to many global societies, editors of many journals by letters, emails, fax, zoom meeting, text book in different languages and oral live presentations, conversation with anonymous judge and we sent email request together with my mentor, Dr. Nagpal sir to chairman, ethics committee of International council of ophthalmology to discuss in International Federation Ophthalmology Society if possible , as issue is global ethical concern (on the contrary to two representatives from each society).

Results: Older generation out of habituation resist and younger generation maintain silence with due respect to elders. Every country will have same laws with different numbers. No attempt was made even with appeal in the past to restore precision. It is unethical to publish incorrect medical terms in journals. Awareness of laws brought more attention to review publications with meta-analysis of meaning of the words. Let ophthalmology be the beginner of removal of incorrect words and visionary to all sciences as laws are applicable to all.

Conclusion: Further freezing of evidences is to be stopped before questioned by future generations after going through many acknowledgements from all over world. Papillitis is being changed to Optic neuritis. One side is habituation and other side is precision. Precision is to be Preferred in science.

 Keywords: Retinoscopy; Retinal Detachment; Phaco Emulsification; Computer Vision Syndrome; Syringing

References

1. Hatch BB., et al. “A prospective, contralateral comparison of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus thin-flap LASIK: assessment of visual function”. Clinical Ophthalmology 5 (2011): 451-457.
2. Hashemi H., et al. “Femtosecond-assisted LASIK versus PRK: comparison of 6-month visual acuity and quality outcome for high myopia”. Eye Contact Lens6 (2016): 354-357.
3. DG Holt. Surgical management of traumatic LASIK flap dislocation with macrostriae and epithelial ingrowth 14 years postoperatively”. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 38 (2012): 357-361.
4. Galvis V., et al. “Traumatic corneal flap avulsion and loss 13 years after LASIK". Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology2 (2019): 172-176.
5. Schmack DG., et al. “Cohesive tensile strength of human LASIK wounds with histologic ultrastructural, and clinical correlations”. Journal of Refractive Surgery 21 (2005): 433-445.
6. V Galvis., et al. “Risk factors and visual results in cases of LASIK flap repositioning due to folds or dislocation: case series and literature review”. International Ophthalmology 34 (2014): 19-26.

Citation

Citation: Katta SV. “Awareness of Indian Penal Codes (226) High Court and (32) Supreme Court to All Global Ophthalmology Journals - Possibility of all Societies Grievance Prone in Teaching".Acta Scientific Ophthalmology 6.9 (2023): 19-22.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Katta SV. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.