Acta Scientific Ophthalmology (ISSN: 2582-3191)

Research Article Volume 5 Issue 12

Analysis of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Dependence on Topometric and Biometric Parameters

Solodkova EG1,2*, Balalin SV1,2, Fokin VP1, Lobanov EV1 and Balalin AS1

1Eye Microsurgery Named After Academician S.N. Fedorov, Volgograd Branch, Volgograd, Russia
2Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia

*Corresponding Author: Solodkova EG, Eye Microsurgery Named After Academician S.N. Fedorov, Volgograd Branch, Volgograd, Russia.

Received: November 07, 2022; Published: November 23, 2022

Abstract

To assess the dependence of biomechanical parameters on the initial biometric, keratometric and tomographic parameters of the cornea in healthy patients with different refractions, a retrospective study was performed, which included 173 eyes of 173 healthy patients with different refractions. The study analyzed the correlation between indicators of corneal stiffness, biomechanically compensated intraocular pressure, measured using Pentacam HR and Corvis ST (OCULUS Optikgeräte GmbH; Wetzlar, Germany), true keratometry, anteroposterior eyeball size, corneal thickness in the central optical zone and the age of the patient.

As a result of the study, a significant direct dependence of the corneal stiffness parameter was noted, first of all, on the corneal thickness in the central optical zone (p = 0.0000), on the level of biomechanically compensated intraocular pressure (p = 0.0056), as well as a reliable inverse dependence on keratometry (p = 0.0465), but there was no influence on the patient's age (p = 0.382) and the anteroposterior eyeball size (p = 0.851).

Keywords: Amplitude of Corneal Deformation; Corneal Stiffness; Corneal Biomechanical Properties

References

  1. Aznabaev BM., et al. “Vzaimosvyazi mezhdu biomekhanicheskimi svoystvami korneoskleral'noy obolochki i morfometricheskimi pokazatelyami glaza u patsiyentov s pervichnoy otkrytougol'noy glaukomoy. [Relationship between biomechanical properties of corneoscleral membrane and morphometric parameters of the eye in patients with primary open angle glaucoma]”. Oftal'mologiya. [Ophthalmology]3 (2019): 335-343.
  2. Bubnova IA and Asatryan SV. “Biomekhanicheskiye svoystva rogovitsy i pokazateli tonometrii. [Biomechanical properties of the cornea and tonometry indices]”. Vestnik oftal'mologii [Bulletin of Ophthalmology] 4 (20169): 27-32.
  3. Iomdina EN., et al. “Korneoskleral'naya obolochka glaza: vozmozhnosti otsenki biomekhanicheskikh svoystv v norme i pri patologii. [Corneoscleral membrane of the eye: the possibilities of biomechanical properties estimation in norm and pathology]”. Oftal'mologiya. [Ophthalmology]2 (2016): 62-68.
  4. Ambrosio R Jr., et al. “Evaluation of corneal shape and biomechanics before LASIK”. International Ophthalmology Clinics 51 (2011): 11-38.
  5. Roberts C. “The cornea is not a piece of plastic”. Journal of Refractive Surgery 16 (2000): 407-413.
  6. Luce DA. “Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer”. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 1 (2005): 156-162.
  7. Ambrosio R Jr., et al. “Dynamic ultrahigh speed Scheimpflug imaging for assessing corneal biomechanical properties”. Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia 72 (2013): 99102.
  8. Huseynova T., et al. “Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared and Scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes”. American Journal of Ophthalmology 57 (2014): 885-893.
  9. Vinciguerra R., et al. “Influence of pachymetry and intraocular pressure on dynamic response parameters in healthy patients”. Journal of Refractive Surgery 32 (2016): 550-561.
  10. Salomao MQ., et al. “Advances in anterior segment imaging and analysis”. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 20 (2009): 324-332.
  11. Ambrosio R Jr., et al. “Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection”. Journal of Refractive Surgery 7 (2017): 434-444.
  12. Roberts СJ., et al. “Introduction of Two Stiffness Parameters at Interpretation of Air Puff Induced Biomechanical Deformation Response Parameters with a Dinamic Scheimpflug Analyser”. Journal of Refractive Surgery4 (2017): 266-273.
  13. Joda AA., et al. “Development and validation of a correction equation for Corvis tonometry”. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 19 (2016): 943-953.

Citation

Citation: Solodkova EG., et al. “Analysis of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Dependence on Topometric and Biometric Parameters".Acta Scientific Ophthalmology 5.12 (2022): 31-36.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Solodkova EG., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate35%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
ISI- IF1.042
JCR- IF0.24

Indexed In




News and Events


Contact US