Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (ASMS)(ISSN: 2582-0931)

Case Report Volume 9 Issue 1

Aesthetics and Precision: A Case Report on Indirect Ceramic Restorations

Dan Pãtroi1#, Laura Iosif2#, Georgiana Florentina Gheorghe3*, Oana Elena Amza3*, Bogdan Dimitriu3

1Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Titu Maiorescu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
2Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
3Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania

*Corresponding Author: Georgiana Florentina Gheorghe and Oana Elena Amza, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania. Georgiana Florentina Gheorghe: georgiana.gheorghe@umfcd.ro; Oana Elena Amza: oana.amza@umfcd.ro

# This author equally contributed to the first author

Received: November 20, 2024; Published: December 10, 2024

Abstract

From a restorative point of view there are many options to restore cavities with extended coronal distruction such as: direct, semi-direct, indirect resin-based procedures and indirect ceramic restorations. As digital dentistry became more prevalent, indirect ceramic restorations is the treatment choice for such situations. To illustrate this, we present  a case report where two large cavities on posterior teeth have been restored using digital impression and ceramic restorations.

 Keywords: Indirect Ceramic Restorations; Digital Impression; Aesthetics Function; Digital Dentistry

References

  1. Al-Fouzan AF and Tashkandi E A. “Volumetric measurements of removed tooth structure associated with various preparation designs”. The International Journal of Prosthodontics6 (2013): 545-548.
  2. Murphy F., et al. “Coronal tooth structure in root-treated teeth prepared for complete and partial coverage restorations”. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation6 (2009): 451-461.
  3. Banks RG. “Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: a literature review”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 63 (1990): 619-626.
  4. Taggart WH. “A New and Accurate Method of Making Gold Inlays”. Dental Cosmos 49 (1907): 1117-1121.
  5. Forna NC. “Protetică dentară”. Enciclopedică (2011): 172-178.
  6. Besrour A., et al. “Contribution of Ceramic Restorations to Create an Optimal Interproximal Area”. Journal of Clinical and Medical Images3 (2019): 1-6.
  7. Skorulska A., et al. “Review on polymer, ceramic and composite materials for cad/cam indirect restorations in dentistry—Application, mechanical characteristics and comparison”. Materials7 (2021): 1592.
  8. Bonfante E A., et al. “Indirect restorative systems—A narrative review”. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry1 (2023): 84-104.
  9. Ispas A., et al. “SEM Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation E-Max Crowns Manufactured by Printing-Pressed and Milling”. Diagnostics23 (2023): 3518.
  10. Cardoso JA., et al. “Clinical guidelines for posterior restorations based on Coverage, Adhesion, Resistance, Esthetics, and Subgingival management: The CARES concept: Part I-partial adhesive restorations”. International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 3 (2023).
  11. Moussa C., et al. “Fracture Resistance of Direct versus Indirect Restorations on Posterior Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. Bioengineering6 (2024): 536.
  12. Althaqafi K A and Mirah M A. “Bond Strength of Indirect Restorations and Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Systematic Review”. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research3 (2024).
  13. Hölken F and Dietrich H. “Restoring teeth with an advanced lithium disilicate ceramic: a case report and 1‐year follow‐up”. Case Reports in Dentistry 1 (2022): 6872542.
  14. Nirmala S., et al. “Ceramic onlay: A case report”. Cureus12 (2022).
  15. Fotiadou C., et al. “Longevity of lithium disilicate indirect restorations in posterior teeth prepared by undergraduate students: A retrospective study up to 8.5 years”. Journal of Dentistry 105 (2021): 103569.
  16. Santos ERD and Busato AL. “Microleakage in posterior teeth with different materials and different types of cavities”. Indian Journal of Dental Research 30 (2019): 783-787.
  17. Mackenzie L., et al. “Indirect restorations: an update”. Dental Update5 (2023): 331-342.
  18. Azeem RA and Sureshbabu N M. “Clinical performance of direct versus indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth: A systematic review”. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics1 (2018): 2-9.
  19. Vetromilla BM., et al. “Treatment options for large posterior restorations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis”. The Journal of the American Dental Association8 (2020): 614-624.
  20. Watanabe H., et al. “Digital technologies for restorative dentistry”. Dental Clinics4 (2022): 567-590.
  21. Revilla-León M., et al. “Artificial intelligence applications in restorative dentistry: A systematic review”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry5 (2022): 867-875.

Citation

Citation: Georgiana Florentina Gheorghe., et al. “Aesthetics and Precision: A Case Report on Indirect Ceramic Restorations”.Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 9.1 (2025): 32-38.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2025 Georgiana Florentina Gheorghe., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.403

Indexed In





Contact US