Dan Patroi¹, Georgiana Florentina Gheorghe²*, Laura Iosif^3#, Oana Elena Amza²* and Bogdan Dimitriu²

¹Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Titu Maiorescu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
²Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
³Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania

*Corresponding Author: Georgiana Florentina Gheorghe: georgiana.gheorghe@umfcd.ro; Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania and Oana Elena Amza: oana.amza@umfcd.ro; Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.

Received: November 11, 2024 Published: November 21, 2024

Abstract

Nowadays, digital tehnologies incorporated in our daily practice, help us to provide optimized and personalized oral health care. This case presentation is aimed at describing a full-digital protocol of an aesthetic rehabilitation of a young female patient and evaluating its clinical performance.

 Keywords: Digital Impression; Aesthetic Rehabilitation; Intraoral Scanner

References

1. Rekov ED. “Dental CAD/CAM systems: a 20-year success story”. Journal of the American Dental Association 137 (2006): 5S-6S.
2. Allen KL., et al. “An overview of the CEREC 3D CAD/CAM system”. General Dentistry3 (2004): 234-235.
3. Kravitz ND., et al. “Intraoral digital scanners - Overview”. JCO 48 (2014): 337-347.
4. Richert R., et al. “Intraoral Scanner Technologies: A Review to Make a Successful Impression”. Journal of Healthcare Engineering 2017 (2017): 8427595.
5. Ireland A J., et al. “3D surface imaging in dentistry - what we are looking at”. British Dental Journal7 (2008): 387-392.
6. Seelbach P., et al. “Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow”. Clinical Oral Investigation 17 (2013): 1759-1764.
7. Birnbaum NS and Aaronson HB. “Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality”. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 29 (2008): 494, 496, 498-505.
8. Yuzbasioglu E., et al. “Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes”. BMC Oral Health1 (2024): 1-10.
9. Kihara H., et al. “Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review”. Journal of Prosthodontic Research2 (2020): 109-113.
10. Eggmann F and Blatz MB. “Recent advances in intraoral scanners”. Journal of Dental Research (2024): 00220345241271937.
11. Dimova-Gabrovska M., et al. “The Modern Digital Intraoral Scanning Systems: A Review”. Acta Medica Bulgarica2 (2024): 58-64.
12. Kim J., et al. “Comparison of experience curves between two 3-dimensional intraoral scanners”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 116 (2016): 221-230.
13. Giménez B., et al. “Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth”. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research (2015): e54-e64.
14. Christopoulou I., et al. “Intraoral scanners in orthodontics: a critical review”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health3 (2022): 1407.
15. Simpson CD and Smillie SM. “An analysis of the portrayal of dentistry in modern popular film from a dentist's perspective”. British Dental Journal6 (2023): 421-425.
16. Khusanovich KB and Ravshanovich CF. “Types and applications of dental compliments”. Journal of Modern Educational Achievements5 (2023): 95-99.
17. Craig ML. “Perfect smiles, aesthetic citizenship, and the US State”. Citizenship Studies (2024): 1-17.
18. Dag OD. “Laminate Veneers For Different Aesthetic Treatments”. International Dental Journal 74 (2024): S201-S202.
19. Ojeda G D., et al. “Ceramic partial laminate veneers in anterior teeth: A literature review”. Journal of Prosthodontic Research2 (2023): 246-254.
20. Guan X., et al. “Computer-Assisted Porcelain Laminate Veneer Preparation: A Scoping Review of Stereolithographic Template Design and Fabrication Workflows”. Dentistry Journal10 (2024): 302.
21. Shetty SK., et al. “Aesthetic Rehabilitation with Veneers Using Digital Precision: A Case Report”. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research11 (2023).
22. Arcuri L., et al. “Full digital workflow for implant-prosthetic rehabilitations: a case report”. Oral Implantology (Rome) 4 (2016): 114-121.
23. Ahmed WM., et al. “Mapping the landscape of the digital workflow of esthetic veneers from design to cementation: a systematic review”. Dentistry Journal 2 (2024): 28.
24. Ntovas P., et al. “Esthetic rehabilitation through crown lengthening and laminate veneers: A digital workflow”. International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 4 (2023).
25. Abduo J., et al. “Marginal accuracy of monolithic and veneered zirconia crowns fabricated by conventional and digital workflows”. Journal of Prosthodontics8 (2023): 706-713.
26. Cicciù M., et al. “3D digital impression systems compared with traditional techniques in dentistry: a recent data systematic review”. Materials 8 (2020): 1982.
27. D’Ambrosio F., et al. “Conventional versus digital dental impression techniques: what is the future? An umbrella review”. Prosthesis 3 (2023): 851-875.

Citation

Citation: Georgiana Florentina Gheorghe., et al. “Full-Digital Workflow for an Aesthetic Rehabilitation: A Case Report”.Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 8.12 (2024): 116-123.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Georgiana Florentina Gheorghe., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.