Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (ASMS)(ISSN: 2582-0931)

Review Article Volume 8 Issue 11

Current Developments in Endodontic Irrigation

Oana Amza1#, Georgiana Gheorghe1#, Laura Iosif2*, Ana-Maria Țâncu2* and Bogdan Dimitriu1

1Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
2Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania

*Corresponding Author: Laura Iosif and Ana-Maria Țâncu, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy and Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania. # This author equally contributed to the first author

Received: October 11, 2024; Published: October 28, 2024

Abstract

The importance of irrigation in endodontic treatment cannot be overstated. On the one hand the anatomical features of the root canal system and the limitations of instrumentation make impossible complete removal of the dental pulp, dentin mineral debris, smear layer and, most importantly, microorganisms; the endodontic system may only be cleaned and disinfected by proper irrigation. On the other hand, root canal instruments should never be used in dry canals. With both chemical and mechanical effects, efficient irrigation based upon the continuous advancement of irrigants and endodontic irrigation techniques is thus of utmost importance. Throughout the entire evolution of the field of endodontics, irrigation methods experienced a permanent development to enhance effectiveness, safety, and ease of use.

 Keywords: Endodontic Irrigation; Endodontic System Complexity; Microbial Biofilm; Root Canal Disinfection

References

  1. Glossary of Endodontic Terms, Tenth Edition. (2020): 18.
  2. Yue L and Wang XY. “Cariology and endodontics”. 3rd Peking University Medical Press, (2022).
  3. Spielman AI. “History of Endodontics”. In: Illustrated Encyclopedia of the History of Dentistry, (2023).
  4. Chávez de Paz LE. “Microbial Biofilms in Endodontics”. In Basrani B. Endodontic Irrigation, Springer 1 (2015).
  5. Hoiby N., et al. “Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms”. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 4 (2010): 322-332.
  6. Zhao A., et al. “Understanding bacterial biofilms: From definition to treatment strategies”. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 13 (2023).
  7. Mamat R., et al. “The Complexity of the Root Canal Anatomy and Its Influence on Root Canal Debridement in the Apical Region: A Review”. Cureus 11 (2023): 1.
  8. Siqueira JF Jr and Rôças IN. “Present status and future directions: Microbiology of endodontic infections”. International Endodontic Journal 55 (2022): 512-530.
  9. “Endodontic applications of microcomputed tomography for studying root canals”.
  10. Siqueira Junior JF., et al. “Unprepared root canal surface areas: causes, clinical implications, and therapeutic strategies”. Brazilian Oral Research 32 (2018): 2.
  11. Sousa-Neto MD., et al. “Root canal preparation using micro-computed tomography analysis: a literature review”. Brazilian Oral Research 32 (2018): 33.
  12. Flemming HC., et al. “The biofilm matrix: multitasking in a shared space”. Nature Reviews Microbiology2 (2023): 70-86.
  13. Swimberghe RCD., et al. “Biofilm model systems for root canal disinfection: a literature review”. International Endodontic Journal5 (2019): 604-628.
  14. Lopes SP., et al. “Quantitative assessment of individual populations within polymicrobial biofilms”. Scientific Reports 8 (2018): 9494.
  15. De Meyer S., et al. “Effect of laser-activated irrigation on biofilms in artificial root canals”. International Endodontic Journal 50 (2017): 472-479.
  16. Balić M., et al. “The efficacy of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming and sonic-activated irrigation combined with QMiX solution or sodium hypochlorite against intracanal E. faecalis biofilm”. Lasers in Medical Science 31 (2016): 335-342.
  17. Abusrewil S., et al. “Detection, treatment and prevention of endodontic biofilm infections: what's new in 2020?” Critical Reviews Microbiology2 (2020): 194-212.
  18. Yang S., et al. “Strategies and mechanisms targeting Enterococcus faecalis biofilms associated with endodontic infections: a comprehensive review”. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology14 (2024): 1433313.
  19. Chen J., et al. “Oxygen Self-Supplied Nanoplatform for Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy against Enterococcus Faecalis within Root Canals”. Advances in Healthcare Material13 (2024): e2302926.
  20. Nasiri K., et al. “Eradicating Enterococcus faecalis in root canal system: An update”. Journal of Dental Science4 (2024): 2433-2434.
  21. Yang G and Chen W. “In vitro effects of Er: YAG laser-activated photodynamic therapy on Enterococcus faecalis in root canal treatment”. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy 45 (2024): 103992.
  22. Pontes da Silva G., et al. “Antimicrobial effect of Melaleuca alternifolia and Citrus limonum essential oils against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm”. Dental Press Endodontics 2 (2023): 13-38.
  23. Chávez de Paz LE. “Microbial Biofilms in Endodontics”. In Basrani B. Endodontic Irrigation, Springer (2015): 11.
  24. Qutieshat A., et al. “Antimicrobial Irrigation Solutions in Root Canal Treatment: A Glance at the Past, the Present, and the Future”. The Open Dentistry Journal 17 (2023): 2.
  25. Basrani BR and Malkhassian G. “Update on Irrigation” (2021).
  26. Gomes BPFA., et al. “Chlorhexidine in Endodontics”. Brazilian Dental Journal2 (2013): 89-102.
  27. Gomes BPFA., et al. “Irrigants and irrigation activation systems in Endodontics”. Brazilian Dental Journal4 (2023): 1-33.
  28. Zou X., et al. “Expert consensus on irrigation and intracanal medication in root canal therapy”. International Journal of Oral Science 16 (2024): 23.
  29. Mandke L and Padhye L. “Apical Vapour Lock Effect in Endodontics - A Review”. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research 2 (2018): B10-B13.
  30. Puleio F., et al. “CBCT-Based Assessment of Vapor Lock Effects on Endodontic Disinfection”. Applied Sciences 17 (2023): 9542.
  31. Castelo-Baz P., et al. “Efficacy of continuous apical negative ultrasonic irrigation (CANUI) in penetration of simulated lateral canals in extracted teeth”. Scientific Report1 (2023): 10908.
  32. Weller RN., et al. “Efficacy of ultrasonic cleaning”. Journal of Endodontics 6 (1980): 740-743.
  33. Dowell Dental Products.
  34. Dowell Dental Products.
  35. Sonic and Ultrasonic Irrigation.
  36. Ultrasonic Cleaning. Editorial by Industrial Quick Search.
  37. Tronstad L., et al. “Effectiveness and safety of a sonic vibratory endodontic instrument”. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 1 (1985): 69-76.
  38. Liu C., et al. “Evaluation of sonic, ultrasonic, and laser irrigation activation systems to eliminate bacteria from the dentinal tubules of the root canal system”. Journal of Applied Oral Science 30 (2022): e20220199.
  39. Dental Brands. SmartLite EndoActivator Attachment.
  40. Kerr Endodontics launches Endovac Pure irrigation system.
  41. Choi HW., et al. “Comparative analysis of biofilm removal efficacy by multisonic ultracleaning system and passive ultrasonic activation”. Materials 12 (2019): 3492.
  42. The GentleWave® G4 System with ProControl.
  43. The Endo Blog. GentleWave by Sonendo: A First Look.
  44. Irrigation in endodontics - Part 7 - Laser-activated irrigation.
  45. Blakimé A., et al. “Smear layer removal and bacteria eradication from tooth root canals by Erbium lasers irradiation”. Lasers in Dental Science 7 (2023): 167-193.
  46. Waterlase iPlus.

Citation

Citation: Laura Iosif., et al. “Current Developments in Endodontic Irrigation”.Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 8.11 (2024): 148-155.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Laura Iosif., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.403

Indexed In





Contact US