Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (ASMS)(ISSN: 2582-0931)

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 8

Bacterial Prevalence in Sinonasal Aspirates of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Subtypes

Meghanadh Raja Koralla1, Madhavi Jangala1,2, Venkata Ramakrishna Jujjuvarapu1, Dinesh Dudekula1, Padmavathi Putta1, Santoshi Kumari Manche1,2, Pardhanandana P Reddy3 and Jyothy Akka2*

1MAA Research Foundation, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
2Institute of Genetics and Hospital for Genetic Diseases, Osmania University, Begumpet, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
3Bhagawan Mahavir Medical Research Centre, Hyderabad, India

*Corresponding Author: Jyothy Akka, Emeritus Professor and Former Director, Institute of Genetics and Hospital for Genetic Diseases, Osmania University, Begumpet, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Received: July 14, 2023; Published: August 08, 2023

Abstract

Introduction: Bacteria and their products can act as disease modifiers in Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) subtypes. However, studies related to the role of microbes in CRS subtypes are limited.

Objective: The purpose of the present retrospective study was to find and compare the prevalence of bacteria in sinonasal aspirates of CRS subtypes of allergy, asthma, nasal polyps and otitis media.

Patients and Methods: In the present study, microbial culture reports of 253 nasal aspirates and 449 sinus aspirates of CRS subjects who visited MAA ENT Hospitals, Hyderabad, South India from 2009 to 2019 were analyzed.

Results: Of the total CRS subjects 45.3% (n = 228) were affected by allergic rhinitis, 38.2% (27.3%) with nasal polyps, 26.6% (n = 134) with otitis media, 13.1% (n = 66%) with asthma. Bacterial positivity was seen in 48.4% of the cultures. Bacterial positivity increased significantly in sinus aspirates when compared to nasal secretions collected at first visit in CRS subjects with allergy (38.2% vs 22.8%), asthma (12.2% vs 9.4%), nasal polyp’s (grade >2) (17.6% vs 3.9%), otitis media (22.9% vs 14.1)) and hearing loss (30.6% vs 3.1). Staphylococcus aureus was found in 70% of sinus specimens of CRS subjects with asthma when compared to nonasthmatics (54.4%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was mostly seen in nasal secretions at their first visit while klebsiella was seen in sinonasal aspirates of CRS subjects undergoing revision endoscopic surgery.

Conclusion: Our results find that bacterial prevalence varies with CRS subtypes and their severity. Comprehensive management of bacteria at an early stage might prevent the exacerbation of CRS and decrease its burden.

 Keywords: Allergy; Asthma; Adenoids; Nasal Polyps; Otitis Media; Hearing Loss

References

  1. Beule A. “Epidemiology of chronic rhinosinusitis, selected risk factors, comorbidities, and economic burden”. GMS Current Topics in Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 14 (2015): Doc11.
  2. Baroody FM. “How Nasal Function Influences the Eyes, Ears, Sinuses, and Lungs”. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society1 (2011): 53-61.
  3. Chang J., et al. “Nasopharynx as a Microbiologic Reservoir in Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media: Preliminary Study”. Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology3 (2011): 122-125.
  4. Kern RC. “Candidate's Thesis: Chronic Sinusitis and Anosmia: Pathologic Changes in the Olfactory Mucosa”. The Laryngoscope 110 (2000): 1071-1077.
  5. Dhanasekaran S., et al. “A Clinical Study on the Influence of Sinusitis in Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media”. Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery2 (2016).
  6. Manche Santoshi Kumari., et al. “Prevalence and associated risk factors of otitis media and its subtypes in South Indian population”. Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences2 (2017): 57-62.
  7. Wilson MT and Hamilos DT. “The nasal and sinus microbiome in health and disease”. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports 14 (2014):

       8.  Smith WM., et al. “Regional variations in chronic rhinosinusitis, 2003-2006”. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 141 (2009): 347-352.

      9.       Fokkens W., et al. “European  Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps group. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2007”. Rhinology 20                     (2007): 1-136.

      10.   Lund VJ and Kennedy DW. “Staging for rhinosinusitis”. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 117 (1997): S35-40.

  1. Bousquet J., et al. “GA2LEN (Global Allergy and Asthma European Network) addresses the allergy and asthma ‘epidemic’”. Allergy 64 (2009): 969-977. 
  2. Gold LS., et al. “Level of asthma control and healthcare utilization in Latin America”. Allergy 68 (2013): 1463- 1466.
  3. Harmes Kathryn M., et al. “Otitis media: diagnosis and treatment”. American Family Physician7 (2013): 435-440.
  4. Forbes BA., et al. “Diagnostic Microbiology”.11th St. Louis: Mosby; Laboratory methods in basic mycology (2002): 711-98.
  5. Hata DJ., et al. “Multicenter evaluation of the new VITEK 2 advanced colorimetric yeast identification card”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 45 (2007): 1087-1092.
  6. Nadel DM., et al. “Endoscopically guided sinus cultures in chronic sinusitis”.American Journal of Rhinology 12 (2015): 233-241.
  7. Thanasumpun T and Batra PS. “Endoscopically-derived bacterial cultures in chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review”. American Journal of Otolaryngology 36 (2015): 686-691.
  8. Refaat MM., et al. “Immunological role of nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriage in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis”. The Pan African Medical Journal 1 (2008): 3.
  9. MR Redinbo. “The microbiota, chemical symbiosis, and human disease”. Journal of Molecular Biology 426 (2014): 3877-3891.
  10. Earl CS., et al. “The changing face of asthma and its relation with microbes”. Trends in Microbiology7 (2015): 408-418.
  11. Ramakrishnan VR., et al. “Prevalence and abundance of Staphylococcus aureus in the middle meatus of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyps, and asthma”. International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology 3 (2013): 267-271. 
  12. Chalermwatanachai T., et al. “The microbiome of the upper airways: focus on chronic rhinosinusitis”. World Allergy Organization Journal 8 (2015): 3.
  13. Sachse F., et al. “Staphylococcus aureus invades the epithelium in nasal polyposis and induces IL-6 in nasal epithelial cells in vitro”. Allergy 11 (2010): 1430-1437.
  14. Van Zele T., et al. “Staphylococcus aureus colonization and IgE antibody formation to enterotoxins is increased in nasal polyposis”. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology114 (2004): 981-983.
  15. Stern S., et al. “Bacteriology of the Middle Meatus in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with and without Polyposis”. Journal for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and its Related Specialties4 (2016): 223-231.
  16. Leach AJ and Morris PS. “Perspectives on infective ear disease in indigenous Australian children”. Journal of Pediatric Child Health 37 (2001): 529-530.
  17. Smith-Vaughan H., et al. “Measuring nasal bacterial load and its association with otitis media”. BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders1 (2006): 10.
  18. Pagella F., et al. “Rhinosinusitis and otitis media: the link with adenoids”. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology 23 (2010): 38-40.
  19. Zhang Z., et al. “Different clinical factors associated with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic rhinosinusitis”. International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology8 (2015): 724-733.
  20.     30.   Bhattacharyya N and Kepnes LJ. “The microbiology of recurrent rhinosinusitis after endoscopic sinus surgery”. Archives of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 125 (1999): 1117-1120.

       31.   Stephenson MF., et al. “Molecular characterization of the polymicrobial flora in chronic rhinosinusitis”. Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 39 (2010): 182-187.

Citation

Citation: Jyothy Akka., et al. “Bacterial Prevalence in Sinonasal Aspirates of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Subtypes”.Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 7.8 (2023): 47-53.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Jyothy Akka., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.403

Indexed In





Contact US