Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (ASMS)(ISSN: 2582-0931)

Review Article Volume 7 Issue 9

Modern Methods of Decontamination of the Endodontic System

Elena Zabrac1, Ioana Suciu2*, Dana Bodnar3, Bogdan Dimitriu2, Monica Voiculeanu2, Ruxandra Ioana Bartok4 and Mihaela Chirila2

1PhD Student at University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila" Bucharest, Romania
2Department of Endodontics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila" Bucharest, Romania
3Department of Operative Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila" Bucharest, Romania
4Department of Esthetic Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” Bucharest, Romania

*Corresponding Author: Ioana Suciu, Department of Endodontics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila" Bucharest, Romania.

Received: July 28, 2023; Published: August 08, 2023

Abstract

This review article offers various aspects of the use of disinfection methods that are actually used in endodontics. So, along conventional root canal decontamination methods, namely sodium hypochlorite and EDTA irrigation, adjuvant methods can be used to improve the quality of the endodontic system disinfection. In this respect, the dental laser facilitates guiding the irrigant into difficult-to-reach areas for instruments (isthmus, dentin canaliculi, apical delta, the cross-section extension of the oval canal, lateral canals). Ozone therapy, as well as nanoparticle therapy can be added as an adjuvant to the classical therapeutic scheme.

 Keywords: Erbium Laser; Disinfection Endodontics; NaOCl; EDTA

References

  1. Gomes BP., et al. “Microorganisms from canals of root filled teeth with periapical lesions”. International Endodontic Journal 36 (2003): 1-11.
  2. Rocas IN., et al. “Association of enterococcus Faecalis with different forms of periradicular diseases”. Journal of Endodontics 30 (2004): 315-320.
  3. Singh H. “Microbiology of endodontic infections”. Journal of Dentistry and Oral Hygiene 2 (2016): 1-4.
  4. Murad CF., et al. “Antimicrobial activity of sodium sodium hypoclorite, chlorhexine, and MTAD against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm on biofilm on human dentine”. Revista Brasileira de Odontologia 9 (2012): 143-150.
  5. Domenico Ricucci., et al. “Endodontology: An integrated biological and clinical view”. (2003): 193.
  6. Estrela C., et al. “Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite”. Brazilian Dental Journal 13 (2002): 113-117.
  7. Zahed Mohammadi. “Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: an update review”. International Dental Journal 58 (2008): 329-341.
  8. Cohen S., et al. “Vertical root fractures: clinical and radiographic diagnosis”. Journal of the American Dental Association 134 (2003): 434-441.
  9. Cohen S., et al. “A demographic analysis of vertical root fractures”. Journal of Endodontics 21 (1995): 337-339.
  10. Siqueira JF Jr., et al. “Evaluation of the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite used with three irrigation methods in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal, in vitro”. International Endodontic Journal 1997 30 (1997): 279-282.
  11. Ioana Suciu and Bogdan Dimitriu. “Infectia sistemului endodontic”. Editura Universitara Carol Davila (2016).
  12. Sen BH., et al. “The smear layer: A phenomenon in root canal therapy”. International Endodontic Journal 28 (1995): 141-145.
  13. Hauman CH and Love RM. “Biocompatibility of dental materials used in contemporary endodontic therapy: a review. Part 1. Intracanal drugs and substances”. International Endodontic Journal 36 (2003): 75-85.
  14. A Khademi., et al. “The Effect of EDTA and Citric Acid on Smear Layer Removal of Mesial Canals of First Mandibular Molars, A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study”. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 2 (2004): 80-88.
  15. Goldman M., et al. “The efficacy of several endodontic irrigating solutions: A scanning electron microscopic study”. Journal of Endodontics 8 (1982): 487-492.
  16. Yamada Rs., et al. “A scanning electron microscopic comparison of a high volume final flash with several irrigating solutions”. Journal of Endodontics 9 (1983): 137-142.
  17. Senna RA., et al. “The effect of EDTA on the antibacterial activity of sodium hypochlorite”. General Dentistry 66 (2018): 74-78.
  18. Bagchi S. “Telemedicine in rural India”. PLoS Medicine 3 (2006): 297-299.
  19. Kirshner M. “The role of information technology and informatics research in the dentist-patient relationship”. Advances in Dental Research 17 (2003): 77-81.
  20. Love RM. “Enterococcus faecalis - a mechanism of its role in endodontic failure”. International Endodontic Journal 34 (2001): 399-405.
  21. de Groot SD., et al. “Laser-activated irrigation within root canals: cleaning efficacy and flow visualization”. International Endodontic Journal 42 (2009): 1077-1083.
  22. Blanken J., et al. “Laser induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 1: a visualization study”. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 41 (2009): 514-519.
  23. De Moor RJ., et al. “Laser induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 2: evaluation of the efficacy”. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 41 (2009): 520-523.
  24. Olivi G and DiVito E. “Photoacoustic endodontics using PIPS: experimental background and clinical protocol”. Journal of Laser Health Acad.1 (2012): 22-25.
  25. Dr Gregori M Kurtzman. Laser-enhanced endodontic treatment”. laser-dentar.com (2021).
  26. Koch JD., et al. “Irrigant flow during photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV)”. Clinical Oral Investigations2 (2021): 381-386.
  27. A Moritz., et al. “Oral Laser Application”. Lasers in Dentistry (2003).
  28. de Groot SD., et al. “Laser-activated irrigation within root canals: Cleaning efficacy and flow visualization”. International Endodontic Journal12 (2009): 1077-1083.
  29. De Moor RJ., et al. “Efficacy of ultrasonic versus laser-activated irrigation to remove artificially placed dentin debris plugs”. Journal of Endodontics9 (2010): 1580-1583.
  30. Arslan H., et al. “Effect of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming on removal of apically placed dentinal debris”. International Endodontic Journal11 (2014): 1072-1077.
  31. Akcay M., et al. “Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study”. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine1 (2016): 70-76.
  32. Louis E Chavez de Paz., et al. “The Root canal Biofilm”. Springer (2015).
  33. “Current Application and Future Directions of Lasers in Narrative Review”. Bioengineering 10 (2023):

Citation

Citation: Ioana Suciu., et al. “Modern Methods of Decontamination of the Endodontic System”.Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 7.9 (2023): 42-46.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Ioana Suciu., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.403

Indexed In





Contact US