Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (ASMS)(ISSN: 2582-0931)

Research Article Volume 6 Issue 6

Evaluation of Educational Environment: Perceptions of Preclinical and Clinical Year Medical Students from Malaysia

Kye Mon Min Swe1*, Chan Choong Foong2 and Vinod Pallath2

1Department of Population Medicine, University Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia
2Medical Education and Research Development Unit, University Malaya, Malaysia

*Corresponding Author: Kye Mon Min Swe, Department of Population Medicine, University Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia.

Received: April 11, 2022; Published: May 09, 2022

Abstract

Background: Educational environment of an education institution is where teaching and learning activities occur. Educational environment plays an important role in academic achievements, satisfaction and successes of student and it is a major determinant of developing effective learning.

Aims: The aims of the study were to determine the perceptions of educational environment among all medical students at and to compare these perceptions between pre-clinical and clinical year students.

Settings and Design: This cross-sectional study involved all medical students (from Year 1 to Year 5) of University Tunku Abdul Rahman. Year 1 and Year 2 were pre-clinical years and Year 3 to Year 5 were clinical years.

Methods and Material: Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) was used to determine the educational environment. Statistical analysis used: SPSS 26 was used to analyse the data. Analysis of variance was used to compare the mean scores of the domains of DREEM.

Results: Two-hundred-and-seven (n = 207) students responded to the questionnaires. Perceptions of medical students on educational environment showed that there were more positive than negative aspects (M = 123.41). Highest rated item was item 2; “The teachers are knowledgeable” (M = 3.43) and lowest rated item was item 27; “I am able to memorize all I need” (M = 1.27). Meanwhile, upon comparison, pre-clinical year students were more satisfied than clinical year students did in all the five domains of DREEM. In addition, social self-perception (Domain 5) in pre-clinical years was significantly greater than clinical years.

Conclusion: This study identified strengths and areas for improvement of the educational environment at UTAR. Strengths should be maintained to continue satisfying learning needs of the medical students. It was recommended that educational environment related with social life of clinical year students should be monitored closely.

Keywords: Educational Environment; DREEM; Perception; Medical Students; Malaysia

References

  1. Pai GP., et al. “Medical Students’ Perception of Their Educational Environment”. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research1 (2014): 103-107.1.
  2. Roff S and McAleer S. “What is educational climate?” In: JM Genn (Editor), Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education: A unifying perspective. AMEE Education Guide, 23 (2001): 3-4.
  3. Till H. “Climate studies: Can students’ perceptions of the ideal educational environment be of use for institutional planning and resource utilization?” Medical Teacher4 (2005): 332-337.
  4. Edgren G., et al. “Comparing the educational environment (as measured by DREEM) at two different stages of curriculum reform”. Medical Teacher 32 (2010): e233-e238.
  5. Miles S., et al. “Comparing staff and student perceptions of the student experience at a new medical school”. Medical Teacher6 (2009): 539-546.
  6. Genn JM. “AMEE Medical Education Guide No 23 (Part 1): curriculum environment, climate, quality and change in medical education a unifying perspective”. Medical Teacher 23 (2001): 337-344.
  7. Audin K., et al. “University quality of life and learning: an approachto student wellbeing, satisfaction and institutional change”. Journal of Further and Higher Education4 (2003): 365-382.
  8. Vygotsky L. “Interaction between learning and development”. Readings on the development of children 23.3 (1978): 34-41.
  9. Ryan R M and Deci E L. “Self-Determination Theory: A Macro theory of Human Motivation, Development, and Health”. Canadian Psychology3 (2008): 182-185.
  10. Crawford K. “Vygotskian approaches in human development in the information era”. Educational Studies in Mathematics1-2 (2008): 43-62.
  11. “Accreditation council for graduate medical education: glossary of terms”. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. (2010a).
  12. Goldie J. “AMEE education guide no. 29: Evaluating educational programmes”. Medical Teacher 28 (2006): 210-224.
  13. Al-naggar R A., et al. “The Malaysia DREEM: perceptions of medical students about the learning environment in a medical school in Malaysia”. Advances in Medical Education and Practice1 (2014): 177-184.
  14. Cook DA. “Twelve tips for evaluating educational programs”. Medical Teacher2 (2010): 96-301.
  15. Roff S. “The Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM)- a generic instrument for measuring students’ perceptions of undergraduate health professions curricula”. Medical Teacher4 (2005): 322-325.
  16. McAleer S and Roff S. “A practical guide to using the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). AMEE Education Guide No 23, Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education: a unifying perspective”. J.M. GENN (Ed.) (Dundee, UK: Association of Medical Education in Europe) (2001).
  17. Taber K S. “The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education”. Research in Science Education6 (2018): 1273-1296.
  18. Abraham R., et al. “Students’ perceptions of learning environment in an Indian medical school”. BMC Medical Education 8 (2008): 20.
  19. Miles S., et al. “The Dundee ready education environment measure (DREEM): a review of its adoption and use”. Medical Teacher9 (2012).
  20. Arzuman H., et al. “Students’ perception of learning environment: A Base Line Study for identifying areas of concern at a Private Medical College, Bangladesh”. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science2 (2016): 234-242.
  21. Zamzuri AT., et al. “Students perceptions of the educational environment at dental training college”. Malaysian Dental Journal 25 (2004): 15-26.
  22. Hassan II. “A study of stressors and coping strategies among first year nursing students in the College of Polytech Mara, Kota Bharu, Kelantan [master’s thesis]”. Kota Bharu: Universiti Sains Malaysia (2007).
  23. Lai N., et al. “The educational environment and self-perceived clinical competence of senior medical students in a Malaysian medical school”. Educational Health (Abingdon) 22.2 (2093): 148.
  24. Palomo-López P., et al. “Student perceptions of the education environment in a Spanish medical podiatry school”. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research14 (2018).
  25. Salih KMA., et al. “Measurement of the Educational Environment”. Advances in Medical Education and Practice 9 (2018): 617-622.
  26. Vaughan N., et al. “Teaching in Blended Learning Environments: Creating and Sustaining Communities of Inquiry”. Au Press. Edmonton, Canada. (2014).
  27. Vieira JE., et al. “Assessment of the Environment with DREEM at a Medical School Using Active Methodologies and an Integrated Curriculum”. Creative Education 6 (2015): 1920-1935.
  28. Idon PI., et al. “Students’ Perceptions of the Educational Environment in a New Dental School in Northern Nigeria”. Journal of Education and Practice8 (2015).
  29. Fidelma D., et al. “Assessment of the undergraduate medical education environment in a large UK medical school”. Health Education Journal2 (2006): 149-58.
  30. Edgerton E., et al. “Students’ perceptions of their school environments and the relationship with educational outcomes”. Educational and Child Psychology1 (2010): 33-45.
  31. Imran N., et al. “Student’s perceptions of educational environment across multiple undergraduate medical institutions in Pakistan using DREEM inventory”. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association 1 (2015).
  32. Farajpour A., et al. “Perception of educational environment among undergraduate students of health diciplines in an Iranian University”. International Journal of Medical Education 8 (2017): 300-306.
  33. Jiffry MT., et al. “Using the DREEM questionnaire to gather baseline information on an evolving medical school in Sri Lanka”. Medical Teacher4 (2005): 348-352.
  34. Bassaw B., et al. “Students’ perspectives on the educational environment, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Trinidad”. Medical Teacher5 (2003): 522-526.
  35. Hasnian S., et al. “Evaluation of perceptions of undergraduate medical students about learning environment at Allama Iqbal Medical College Lahore, Pakistan”. Biomedica 3 (2019): 192-199.
  36. Palés J., et al. “Educational climate perception by preclinical and clinical medical students in five Spanish medical schools”. International Journal of Medical Education 6 (2015): 65-75.
  37. Arzuman H., et al. “Preclinical medical students’ perception about their educational environment based on DREEM at a Private University, Malaysia”. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science4 (2017): 496-504.
  38. Sajid F., et al. “Perceptions of students of the learning environment studying an integrated medical curriculum”. Journal of Surgery (Pakistan)2 (2019): 86-91.
  39. Al-Ayed IH and Sheik SA. “Assessment of the educational environment at the College of Medicine of King Saud University, Riyadh”. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal4 (2008): 953-959.
  40. “Medical student Perception of educational environment in iabf University Kingdom of Saudi Arabia”. Journal of Family and Community Medicine (2019): 45-50.
  41. Fidelma D., et al. “Assessment of the undergraduate medical education environment in a large UK medical school”. Health Education Journal2 (2006): 149-158.
  42. Al-Hazimi A., et al. “Perceptions of the educational environment of the medical school in King Abdul Aziz University, Saudia Arabia”. Medical Teacher6 (2004a): 570-573.
  43. Dunne FS., et al. “Assessment of the undergraduate medical education environment in a large UK medical school”. Health Education Journal2 (2006): 149-158.

Citation

Citation: Kye Mon Min Swe., et al. “Evaluation of Educational Environment: Perceptions of Preclinical and Clinical Year Medical Students from Malaysia”.Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 6.6 (2022): 85-95.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Kye Mon Min Swe., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.403

Indexed In





News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is December 15, 2022.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US