Mohamed Azhari¹*, Anissa Reguragui² and Nadia Merzouk²

¹Assistant Professor in Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Maxillofacial Prosthodontics Department, Mohamed V University, Faculty of Dentistry of Rabat, Rabat - Institutes, Morocco
²Professor in Removable Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthesis Department, Mohamed V University, Morocco, Faculty of Dentistry of Rabat, Morocco

*Corresponding Author: Mohamed Azhari, Assistant Professor in Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Maxillofacial Prosthodontics Department, Mohamed V University, Faculty of Dentistry of Rabat, Rabat - Institutes, Morocco.

Received: November 16, 2021; Published: January 13, 2022

Abstract

Deferred or ambulatory impressions are the complementary anatomical and functional impression’s method in Complete Denture. They are made on transitional or old prostheses. Their interest is to allow to record the bearing surface under physiological conditions offered by the oral functions. The materials used are the tissue conditioners or gum resins by their properties ensuring the long-term modeling these materials must be always associated with a surfacing impression using precise materials. These are made in most optimal conditions of maxillo-mandibular reports to ensure physiological trace. Through a clinical be described the different stages of this type of impression.

Keywords: Ambulatory Impression; Tissue Conditioner; Complete Denture

References

1. Jaudoin P., et al. “Empreintes en prothèse complète”. EM Consulte (1996).
2. Wilson H., et al. “Tissue conditioners and functional impression materials”. British Dental Journal 121 (1996): 9-16.
3. Ogolnik R., et al. “Cahiers des biomatériaux dentaires: 1- Matériaux minéraux 2- Matériaux organiques”. Masson (1992).
4. Rantanen t and Lindholm k. “Two new tissue conditioners and their ability to reproduce undercuts”. Proceedings of the Finnish Dental Society 69 (1973): 105-109.
5. Echardson S and Johansonn EG. “Coe-comfort as impression material. In vitro experiment oft wo relevant properties”. Swedish Dental Journal4 (1969): 213-225.
6. Rignon-Bret CJM. “Prothèse amovible complète, prothèse immédiate, prothèse supra-radiculaire et implantaire”. Editions CdP, Collection JPIO, Rueil-Malmaison (2002).
7. Murata H. “Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 93 (2005): 274-281.
8. Qureshi I and Rashid S. “Critical evaluation of materials and procedures used for the functional peripheral moulding”. Journal of the Pakistan Dental Association 19 (2010): 129-132.
9. Elsemann RB. “Degradation of tissue conditioners in complete dentures: an in-situ study”. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 21 (2008): 486-488.
10. Chevaux JM. “Les résines à prise retardée: utilisation rationnelle en fonction de leurs propriétés physicochimiques”. Les cahiers de prothèse (2000): 43-52.
11. Mittal S. “Single step silicone border molding technique for edentulous impression”. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 4 (2012): 85-90.
12. Kinra MS. “Innovative impression technique for complete denture patients”. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences 5 (2013): 34-36.
13. Hong G. “Influence of storage methods on the surface roughness of tissue conditioners”. Dental Materials Journal 27 (2008): 153-158.
14. Kimoto S., et al. “Clinical effects of acrylic resilient denture liners applied to mandibular complete dentures on alveolar ridge”. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 34 (2007): 862-869.

Citation

Citation: Mohamed Azhari., et al. “Interest of Tissue Conditioner for Recording Peripheral Seal in Complete Denture”.Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 6.2 (2022): 78-85.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Mohamed Azhari., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.