Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (ASMS)(ISSN: 2582-0931)

Review Article Volume 4 Issue 12

Telemedicine and Telehealth in the Era of COVID-19 and Beyond

Zainab J Gandhi1*, Zabeen Mahuwala2 and Juzar Ali3

1Department of Medicine, C.U. Shah Medical College, India
2Department of Neurology, University of Kentucky, United States
4Section of Pulmonary/Critical Care/Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans, United States

*Corresponding Author: Zainab J Gandhi, Department of Medicine, C.U. Shah Medical College, India.

Received: September 29, 2020; Published: November 10, 2020

Reprints View PDF Related Articles

×

Abstract

  The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the implementation of telemedicine and its use for patient care. Telemedicine has been used in the past in many settings in non-crisis patient encounters and at many points of care, ranging from emergency room trauma units to clinic outpatient encounters in rural and semi-urban remote areas and as part of chronic care management. It has also been helpful in selected settings during natural disasters to improve access to care where conventional patient-doctor encounters were not possible. With its increased use during the current COVID-19 pandemic, it is important to review if this is truly a step forward in increasing access to care in challenging environments. This review article will attempt to outline the pros and cons of this emerging modality of healthcare delivery.

Keywords: Telemedicine; Telehealth; COVID-19; Clinical Examination

×

References

  1. Oren J Mechanic and Alexa B Kimball. “Telehealth systems”. Stapearls Internet (2020).
  2. Greenhalgh T., et al. “Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study”. BMJ Open1 (2016): e009388.
  3. Handschu R., et al. “Telemedicine in acute stroke: remote video-examination compared to simple telephone consultation”. Journal of Neurology 11 (2008): 1792-1797.
  4. Elphick HE., et al. “Validity and reliability of acoustic analysis of respiratory sounds in infants”. Archives of Disease in Childhood11 (2004): 1059-1063.
  5. Hjorth-Hansen AK., et al. “Feasibility and Accuracy of Tele-Echocardiography, With Examinations by Nurses and Interpretation by an Expert via Telemedicine, in an Outpatient Heart Failure Clinic” (2020).
  6. Saleem SM., et al. “Virtual Ophthalmology: Telemedicine in a Covid-19 Era”. American Journal of Ophthalmology (2020): 237-242.
  7. Khairat S., et al. “Interpreting COVID-19 and Virtual Care Trends: Cohort Study”. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2 (2020): e18811.
  8. Gambhir S and Kathuria M. “DWBAN: Dynamic priority based WBAN architecture for healthcare system”. 2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom) (2016): 3380-3386.
  9. Yuan X., et al. “On energy saving in e-healthcare: a directional MAC protocol for WBAN”. In: 2015 IEEE Globecom Workshops, GC Wkshps (2015).
  10. Becevic M., et al. “Robotic Telepresence in a Medical Intensive Care Unit--Clinicians' Perceptions”. Perspectives in Health Information Management 12 (2015): 1c.
  11. Zaman JAB. “The Enduring Value of the Physical Examination”. Medical Clinics of North America3 (2018): 417-423.
  12. Hansen M., et al. “Interobserver variation in the evaluation of neurological signs: observer dependent factors”. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 3 (1994): 145-149.
  13. Holtz BE. “Patients Perceptions of Telemedicine Visits Before and After the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic”. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (2020).
  14. Finnane A., et al. “Teledermatology for the Diagnosis and Management of Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review”. JAMA Dermatology 3 (2017): 319-327.
  15. Smith AC., et al. “Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)”. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (2020).
  16. McKinsey COVID-19 Consumer Survey (2020).
  17. Telehealth: A quarter billion-dollar reality? (2020).
  18. Chou E., et al. “Onsite telemedicine strategy for coronavirus (COVID-19) screening to limit exposure in ED”. Emergency Medicine Journal (2020).
  19. Accenture Digital Health Consumer Survey (2020).
  20. Rosenkrantz AB., et al. “Technology-Assisted Virtual Consultation for Medical Imaging”. Journal of the American College of Radiology 8 (2016): 995-1002.
  21. Center of Connected Health Policy (2020).
  22. Marien S., et al. “A User-Centered design and usability testing of a web-based medication reconciliation application integrated in an eHealth network”. International Journal of Medical Informatics 126 (2019): 138-146.
  23. Smith AC., et al. “Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)”. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (2020): 1357633X20916567.
  24. Tirupathi R., et al. “Comprehensive review of mask utility and challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic”. Infez Medicine1 (2020): 57-63.
  25. Chou E., et al. “Onsite telemedicine strategy for coronavirus (COVID-19) screening to limit exposure in ED”. Emergency Medicine Journal (2020).
  26. Ohannessian R., et al. “Global Telemedicine Implementation and Integration Within Health Systems to Fight the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Call to Action”. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance2 (2020): e18810.

 

×

Citation

Citation: Zainab J Gandhi., et al. “Telemedicine and Telehealth in the Era of COVID-19 and Beyond". Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 4.12 (2020): 13-16.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.403

Indexed In





Contact US





Creative Commons License Open Access by Acta Scientific is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Based on a work at https://actascientific.com

ff

Acta-Publications

ff

© 2021 Acta Scientific, All rights reserved.