Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (ISSN: 2582-0931)

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 3

Diagnostic Accuracy of RIPASA Scoring System in Acute Appendicitis

Iftikhar Ahmed1*, Nazzuk Shahid2 and Shahid Mahmood3

1Assistant Professor Surgery, HBS Medical and Dental College, Islamabad, Pakistan
2House Officer, Railway Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
3Professor of Surgery, Unit II, Fizaia Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan

*Corresponding Author: Iftikhar Ahmed, Assistant Professor Surgery, HBS Medical and Dental College, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Received: February 14, 2020; Published: February 24, 2020

×

Abstract

Background: Commonest operation done by general surgeons all over the world is appendectomy. Usually these patients were operated on the same day of admission with a view to avoid perforation of appendix and decrease the morbidity associated with this disease. Histopathology shows that percentage of removal of normal appendix is 15-40%. There are different scoring systems and diagnostic tools available like Alvarado scoring system and computerized tomography (CT) scan for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis pre operatively. Investigations like CT scan are expensive and not suitable/affordable for everybody in a third world country like Pakistan.

Objectives: The aim and objective of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a cheap, accurate and easily applicable scoring system like Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (Brunei Darussalam and named after hospital name, RIPASA) in our hospitals.

Methodology: All the patients who were >12 years old and operated for appendectomy were included in this study. These patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 includes those with RIPASA score > 7.5 and those with score < 7.5 were included in group 2. History, physical examination with other routine blood and urine tests were done to fulfill the scoring system. RIPASA scoring was calculated. Ultrasound with pelvic examination was done in all female patients. SPSS 21 was used to analyze the Data.

Results: Out of 140 patients, 60% were male and 99% of total patients were below the age of 40 years. 87% of patients presented within 48 hours of initiation of pain and 88% had tenderness and rebound tenderness in right iliac fossa (RIF). 89.56% of patients had positive histopathology report for acute appendicitis with RIPASSA score of more than 7.5 while only 12% of patients with RIPASSA score of less than 7.5, histopathologist was able to identify signs of acute inflammation under the microscope.

Keywords: RIPASA Score; Acute Appendicitis; Pain Right Iliac Fossa

×

References

  1. Timilsina B., et al. “RIPASA vs Modified Alvarado Scoring System for Diagnosis of Appendicitis”. Journal of College of Medical Sciences Nepal 14.4 (2018): 213-216.
  2. Chong C F., et al. “Evaluation of RIPASA score: a new scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis”. Brunei International Medical Journal 6.1 (2010): 16-17.
  3. El Maksoud W M A., et al. “Comparison between the validity of the ‘Modified Alvarado’ and ‘Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saliha’ scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis”. The Egyptian Journal of Surgery (2019).
  4. Jalil A., et al. “Alvarado Scoring system in prediction of acute appendicitis”. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan 21 (2011): 753-755.
  5. Gautam Chandra., et al. “Comment on article entitled “The RIPASA score is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a western population”. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 32.5 (2017): 761-763.
  6. Tan W., et al. “Prospective Comparison of the Alvarado Score and CT Scan in the Evaluation of Suspected Appendicitis: A Proposed Algorithm to Guide CT Use”. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 220.2 (2015): 218-224.
  7. Muhammad Usman Malik., et al. “The RIPASA score is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a western population”. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 32.4 (2017): 491-497.
  8. Dey S., et al. “Acute appendicitis - a clinicopathological correlation”. Indian Journal of Surgery 72 (2010): 290-293.
  9. Chong C F., et al. “Comparison of RIPASA and Alvarado Scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis”. Singapore Medical Journal 52.5 (2011): 340-345.
  10. Amit Singh., et al. “To Determine Validation of RIPASA Score in Diagnosis of Suspected Acute Appendicitis and Histopathological Correlation with Applicability to Indian Population: a Single Institute Study”. Indian Journal of Surgery 80.2 (2018):113-117.
  11. Shubhi P Bhatnagar and Shahaji Chavan. “Evaluation of RIPASA scores in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis”. International Surgery Journal 5.1 (2018): 193-196.
  12. Hafsa Salim Daber and S Srinath. “Evaluation of RIPASA Scoring in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis”. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 8.13 (2019): 977-981.
  13. Naz A., et al. “Concordance between RIPASA and ALVARADO scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis”. Pakistan Journal of Surgery 34.3 (2018): 210-214.
  14. Aman T., et al. “Evaluation of RIPASA scores for diagnosis of acute appendicitis”. KJMS 11.2 (2018).
  15. Shuaib A., et al. World Journal of Emergency Medicine 8.4 (2017): 276-280.
  16. Malay K Barman., et al. “Use and relevance of modified alvarado scoring system in diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a cross sectional study from West Bengal”. India. 6.2 (2019): 347-350.
  17. Vamsavardhan Pasumarthi CP Madhu. “A comparative study of RIPASA score and ALVARADO score in diagnosis of acute appendicitis”. International Journal of Surgery 5.3 (2018): 796-801.
  18. Balakrishnan Subramani., et al. “Comparison Between Ripasa And Alvarado Scoring In Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis”. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 4.11 (2017): 624-627.
  19. Butt MQ., et al. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan 24.12 (2014): 894-897.
×

Citation

Citation: Iftikhar Ahmed., et al. “Diagnostic Accuracy of RIPASA Scoring System in Acute Appendicitis". Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 4.3 (2020): 114-117.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.403

Indexed In





Contact US