Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (ISSN: 2582-0931)

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 3

Prevalence of Intestinal Parasitic Infection in Three Rural Communities in Mexico

Crisóstomo-Vázquez María del Pilar, Eligio-García Leticia, Caballero-García María de Lourdes, Maravelez-Acosta Víctor Alberto, Soria-Guerrero Mariana and Jiménez-Cardoso Enedina*

Laboratory of Parasitology Research, Hospital Infantil De México Federico Gómez, México City, Mexico

*Corresponding Author: Jiménez-Cardoso Enedina, Laboratory of Parasitology Research, Hospital Infantil De México Federico Gómez, México City, Mexico.

Received: December 05, 2019; Published: February 10, 2020

×

Abstract

Introduction: In Mexico there are communities with significant lags compared to the rest of the country because they have a high level of marginalization and low human development and of which it is not known if the frequency and type of parasites that prevail in these areas. The purpose of this work was to know the prevalence of intestinal parasites and the risk factors in Bahuinocachi (Bocoyna, Chihuahua), Llano de la Parota and Agua Tordillo (Acatepec, Guerrero).

Methodology: The study was cross- sectional of 205 participants. Blood and feces samples were collected. Data on demographics and predisposing factors of intestinal parasitic infection were collected using a questionnaire. The feces were analyzed microscopically after a concentration procedure and the sera were used to search for antibodies against A. lumbricoides, T. canis and E. histolytica by ELISA. 

Results: The overall prevalence of parasitosis was 70.1%. Agua Tordillo presented the highest prevalence of antibodies against A. lumbricoides. 

Conclusions: The three communities studied presented intestinal parasite infection. In Bahuinocachi, protozoas predominate and in Llano la Parota and Agua Tordillo there was co-infection of helminths and protozoa. The study has highlighted the importance of the intestinal parasitic in the communities studied. It is necessary to get better the basic sanitary and environmental conditions as well as the need implement for programs in health education, because it was found that Ascariasis is a health problem and also there is coinfection with protozoa.

Keywords: Intestinal Parasitic; Rural Communities; Prevalence

×

References

  1. Matthys B., et al. “Prevalence and risk factors of helminths and intestinal protozoa infections among children from primary schools in western Tajikistan”. Parasit Vectors 4 (2011): 195. 
  2. Abossie A and Seid M. “Assessment of the prevalence of intestinal parasitosis and associated risk factors among primary school children in Chencha town, Southern Ethiopia”. BMC Public Health 14 (2014): 166.
  3. Shahrul Anuar T., et al. “Prevalence and risk factors associated with Entamoeba histolytica/dispar/ moshkovskii infection among three Orang Asli ethnic groups in Malaysia”. PLoS one 7.10 (2012): e48165. 
  4. Comisión Nacional para el Desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas. “Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo”. Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano de los Pueblos Indígenas de México (2006). 
  5. Pham Duc P., et al. “Risk factors for Entamoeba histolytica infection in an agricultural community in Hanam province, Vietnam”. Parasit Vectors 4 (2011): 102. 
  6. Salud de los Pueblos Indígenas. 
  7. Morales-Espinoza EM., et al. “Intestinal parasites in children, in highly deprived areas in the border región of Chiapas, Mexico”. Salud Pública de México 45.5 (2003): 379-388.
  8. Ehrenberg JP and Ault S. “Negleted diseases of negleted population: Thinking to reshape the determinants of health in Latin America and the Caribbean”. BMC Public Health 5.119 (2005): 13.
  9. Guerrero HMT., et al. “Intestinal parasitosis and feces excretion alternatives in municipalities characterized by high marginality”. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública 34.2 (2008). 
  10. Luna MS., et al. Prevalencia de parasitismo intestinal en niños y mujeres de comunidades indígenas del Río Beni 1.2 (2007): 37-46.
  11. Martinez-Saldaña T., et al. “Análisis comparativo de estudios en 12 regiones indígenas. Programa en estudios para el desarrollo rural”. Proyecto de Colaboración CDI-CP (2006).
  12. Torres JL., et al. La salud de la población indígena en México.
  13. Faust EC., et al. “A critical study of clinical laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of protozoan cysts and helmithes eggs in feces”. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine S1-18 (1938): 169-183.
  14. Marks SL., et al. “Comparison of direct immunofluorescence, modified acid-fast staining, and enzyme immunoassay techniques for detection of Cryptosporidium spp in naturally exposed kittens”. Journal of the National Medical Association 225.10 (2004): 1549-1553.
  15. Nesbitt RA., et al. “Amebiasis and comparison of microscopy to ELISA technique in detection of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar”. Journal of the National Medical Association 96.5 (2004): 671-677.
  16. Ramos F., et al. “Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar: prevalence infection in a rural Mexican community”. Experimental Parasitology 110.3 (2005): 327-330.
  17. Guevara Y., et al. “Enteroparasitosis en poblaciones indígenas y mestizas de la Sierra de Nayarit, México”. Parasitol Latinoam 58.1-2 (2003): 30-34.
  18. Indicadores socioeconómicos de los pueblos indígenas de México, 2002 Lunes, 12 de Enero de (2009).
  19. Monarrez-Espino J., et al. “Intervention to prevent intestinal parasitic reinfections among Tarahumara indigenous schoolchildren in northern Mexico”. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 30 (2011): 196-203.
×

Citation

Citation: Jiménez-Cardoso Enedina., et al. “Prevalence of Intestinal Parasitic Infection in Three Rural Communities in Mexico". Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 4.3 (2020): 57-60.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.403

Indexed In





Contact US