Acta Scientific Dental Sciences (ASDS)(ISSN: 2581-4893)

Research Article Volume 5 Issue 11

Surface Roughness Evaluation of Nano Composites with Different Polishing Techniques: (In-Vitro Study)

Nehad Wafik Basha*, Mohamed Mahmoud Abdel-Mohsen and Heba Mohamed Taher

Department of Conservative Dentistry, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA), Cairo, Egypt

*Corresponding Author: Nehad Wafik Basha, Department of Conservative Dentistry, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA), Cairo, Egypt.

Received: May 17, 2021; Published: October 15, 2021

×

Abstract

Background and Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of Nano resin composites with different polishing techniques (in-vitro study).

Method: 120 composite specimens with a 6 mm diameter and a thickness of 3 mm were fabricated from the nanofilled Filtek Z350 XT (C1) and the nanohybrid Filtek Z250 XT (C2) and equally divided into two main groups (n = 60), 20 specimens of each composite were polished with PoGo single step micro-polishers (P1), Sof-Lex multiple steps polishing system (P2) and polyester strip was used as the control group (P0), (n = 20), a profilometer was used to measure the surface roughness value after specimens’ polishing (Ra), the data were statistically analyzed using Repeated measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni’s post-hoc test (P ≤ 0.05) was used for pair-wise comparisons when ANOVA test is significant.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference between mean Ra of different polishing systems (P-value = 0.001, Effect size = 0.269), no statistically significant difference between PoGo discs and Sof-Lex discs; both showed statistically significantly higher mean Ra than Polyester strip.

Conclusion: 1. The nanofilled Filtek Z350 XT resin composite is a good choice material for the clinical use. 2. the one-step PoGo micro-polisher produced better surface quality in terms of roughness than the multiple steps Sof-Lex polishing system.

Keywords: Resin Composite; Surface Roughness

×

References

  1. Abed YA., et al. “Degree of conversion and surface hardness of bulk-fill composite versus incremental-fill composite”. Tanta Dental Journal2 (2015): 71-80.‏
  2. Antonson SA., et al. “Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites”. Journal of Dentistry 39 (2011): e9-17.‏
  3. Barakah HM and Taher NM. “Effect of polishing systems on stain susceptibility and surface roughness of nanocomposite resin material”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry3 (2014): 625-631.‏
  4. Barbieri GM., et al. “Effect of whitening dentifrices on the surface roughness of commercial composites”. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry5 (2011): 338-345.‏
  5. Bashetty K and Joshi S. “The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites”. Journal of Conservative Dentistry1 (2010): 34-38.
  6. Berger SB., et al. “Surface roughness and staining susceptibility of composite resins after finishing and polishing”. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry1 (2011): 34-43.‏
  7. Boutros F., et al. “Effect of tooth brushing on the surface roughness of different resin composites”. Cairo University, MSc (2005).
  8. Buchgraber B., et al. “Surface roughness of one nanofill and one Silorane composite after polishing”. Collegium Antropologicum3 (2011): 879-883.‏
  9. Canto FMT., et al. “Topography and microhardness changes of nanofilled resin composite restorations submitted to different finishing and polishing systems and erosive challenge”. Brazilian Research in Pediatric Dentistry and Integrated Clinic 20 (2020): e4812.
  10. Carneiro PMA., et al. “Influence of finishing and polishing techniques and abrasion on transmittance and roughness of composite resins”. Operative Dentistry6 (2016): 634-641.‏
  11. Carvalho FG., et al. “Effect of chemical and mechanical degradation on surface roughness of three glass-ionomers and a nanofilled resin composite”. Operative Dentistry5 (2012): 509-517.‏
  12. Chour RG., et al. “Comparative evaluation of effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resin: An in-vitro study”. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry2 (2016): S166-170.
  13. Colombo M., et al. “Effect of different finishing/polishing procedures on surface roughness of Ormocer-based and different resin composites”. Journal of Dental Research6 (2018): 404-410.
  14. Da Costa GD., et al. “Effect of additional polishing methods on the physical surface properties of different nanocomposites: SEM and AFM study”. Microscopy Research and Technique12 (2018): 1467-1473.‏
  15. Da Costa J., et al. “The effect of various dentifrices on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites”. Journal of Dentistry 38 (2010): e123-128.‏
  16. Da Costa J., et al. “The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites”. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry4 (2007): 214-224.‏
  17. Da Costa JB., et al. “Comparison of two-step versus four-step composite finishing/polishing disc systems: evaluation of a new two-step composite polishing disc system”. Operative Dentistry2 (2011): 205-212.‏
  18. Da Rosa GM., et al. “Effect of whitening dentifrices on the surface roughness of a nanohybrid composite resin”. European Journal of Dentistry2 (2016): 170-175.
  19. Dabhi MV., et al. “Comparative evaluation of three different types of tooth brush on surface abrasion of enamel and nanohybrid composite: An in-vitro study”. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences8 (2016): ‏122-127.
  20. Daud A., et al. “A randomized controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy”. Journal of Dentistry 71 (2018): 25-30.‏
  21. Durães I., et al. “Effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of two ceromers”. Brazilian Dental Science2 (2016): 56-63.‏
  22. Eden E., et al. “The effect of finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness, microhardness and microleakage of a nanohybrid composite”. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research3 (2012): 155-160.‏
  23. Ehrmann E., et al. “Finishing and polishing effects of multi-blade burs on the surface texture of 5 resin composites: microhardness and roughness testing”. Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics1 (2019): 1-12.
  24. Elbishari H., et al. “Is deterioration of surface properties of resin composites affected by filler size?” International Journal of Dentistry (2020): 2875262.
  25. Erdemir U., et al. “The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of novel resin composites”. European Journal of Dentistry2 (2012): 198-205.
  26. Ereifej NS., et al. “The effect of polishing technique on 3D surface roughness and gloss of dental restorative resin composites”. Operative Dentistry 1 (2012): E9-20.‏
  27. Ergücü Z and Türkün LS. “Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems”. Operative Dentistry 2 (2007): 185-192.‏
  28. Ertugrul IF., et al. “Effect of different dry‐polishing regimens on the intrapulpal temperature assessed with pulpal blood microcirculation model”. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 3 (2019): 268-274.‏
  29. Filho HN., et al. “Surface roughness of composite resins after finishing and polishing”. Brazilian Dental Journal 1 (2003): 37-41.
  30. Gönülol N and Yılmaz F. “The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites”. Journal of Dentistry 40 (2012): e64-70.‏
  31. Gupta S and Dhawan R. “The effect of various finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of four composite resin materials: An in-vitro study”. International Journal of Contemporary Dental 2 (2012): 1-9.
  32. Heintze S., et al. “Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated tooth brushing in relation to brushing time and load”. Dental Materials4 (2010): 306-319.‏
  33. Itanto BSH., et al. “Comparison of surface roughness of nanofilled and nanohybrid composite resins after polishing with a multi-step technique”. Journal of Physics1 (2017): 1-7. ‏
  34. Jin JIAN., et al. “Surface properties of universal and flowable nanohybrid composites after simulated tooth brushing”. American Journal of Dentistry3 (2014): 149-154. ‏
  35. Jung M., et al. “Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing”. Operative Dentistry4 (2007): 347-355. ‏
  36. Kemaloglu H., et al. “Can reduced‐step polishers be as effective as multiple‐step polishers in enhancing surface smoothness?” Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry1 (2017): 31-40. ‏
  37. Korkmaz Y., et al. “The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites”. Operative Dentistry1 (2008): 44-50. ‏
  38. Kumar S., et al. “A profilometric study to assess the role of toothbrush and toothpaste in abrasion process”. Journal of Dentistry3 (2015): 267-273.
  39. Kyoizumi H., et al. “Effects of toothbrush hardness on in vitro wear and roughness of composite resins”. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice6 (2013): 1137-1144.
  40. Lassila L., et al. “Effects of different polishing protocols and curing time on surface properties of a bulk-fill composite resin”. The Chinese Journal of Dental Research1 (202): 63-69.
  41. Lopes IAD., et al. “The effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and gloss of two nanocomposites”. Saudi Dental Journal3 (2018): 197-207. ‏
  42. Moda MD., et al. “Comparison of different polishing methods on the surface roughness of microhybrid, microfill, and nanofill composite resins”. Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry1 (2018): e12287. ‏
  43. Monteiro B and Spohr AM. “Surface roughness of composite resins after simulated tooth brushing with different dentifrices”. Journal of International Oral Health7 (2015): 1-5.
  44. Mozzaquatro LR., et al. “The effect of brushing and aging on the staining and smoothness of resin composites”. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry2 (2017): E44-55.
  45. Nagem-Filho H., et al. “Surface roughness of composite resins after finishing and polishing”. Brazilian Dental Journal1 (2003): 37-41.‏
  46. Nasoohi N., et al. “Effects of wet and dry finishing and polishing on surface roughness and microhardness of composite resins”. Journal of Dentistry2 (2017): 69-75.
  47. Nayyer M., et al. “Comparative abrasive wear resistance and surface analysis of dental resin-based materials”. European Journal of Dentistry1 (2018): 57-66.
  48. Nithya K., et al. “Evaluation of surface roughness, hardness and gloss of composites after three different finishing and polishing techniques: An in-vitro study”. The Cureus Journal of Medical Science2 (2020): e7037.
  49. Oliveira GUD., et al. “Impact of filler size and distribution on roughness and wear of composite resin after simulated tooth brushing”. Journal of Applied Oral Science5 (2012): 510-516.‏
  50. O'Neill C., et al. “Effect of tooth brushing on gloss retention and surface roughness of five bulk‐fill resin composites”. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry1 (2018): 59-69. ‏
  51. Ozel E., et al. “Effect of one-step polishing systems on surface roughness of different flowable restorative materials”. Dental Materials Journal6 (2008): 755-764. ‏
  52. Pala K., et al. “Evaluation of the surface hardness, roughness, gloss and color of composites after different finishing/polishing treatments and thermocycling using a multi-technique approach”. Dental Materials Journal2 (2016): 278-289. ‏
  53. Patel B., et al. “Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites”. Journal of Conservative Dentistry1 (2016): 37-40.
  54. Penteado RA., et al. “Evaluation of surface roughness of microhybrid and nanofilled composites after pH-cycling and simulated tooth brushing”. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice6 (2010): E17-24. ‏
  55. Pierre L., et al. “Influence of polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resins: polishability of composite resins”. Operative Dentistry3 (2019): E122-132. ‏
  56. Prakki A., et al. “In-vitro wear, surface roughness and hardness of propanal-containing and diacetyl-containing novel composites and copolymers based on Bis-GMA analogs”. Dental Materials3 (2008): 410-417.‏
  57. Rajan VV., et al. “Effects of tooth brushing on wear, surface roughness, and color stability of composite resins: A review”. Journal of Pharmacy Research1 (2018): 95-102.‏
  58. Rigo LC., et al. “Influence of polishing system on the surface roughness of flowable and regular-viscosity bulk fill composites”. International Symposium on Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry4 (2018): e79-86.‏
  59. Rocha ACD., et al. “Evaluation of surface roughness of a nanofill resin composite after simulated brushing and immersion in mouthrinses, alcohol and water”. Materials Research1 (2010): 77-80.‏
  60. Rodrigues-Junior SA., et al. “Surface roughness and gloss of actual composites as polished with different polishing systems”. Operative Dentistry4 (2015): 418-429. ‏
  61. Roopa KB., et al. “Effect of whitening dentifrice on micro-hardness, color stability and surface roughness of aesthetic restorative materials”. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research3 (2016): ZC06-11.
  62. Roselino L., et al. “Color stability and surface roughness of composite resins submitted to brushing with bleaching toothpastes: An in-situ study”. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry5 (2019): 486-492.‏
  63. Roselino L., et al. “Effect of brushing time and dentifrice abrasiveness on color change and surface roughness of resin composites”. Brazilian Dental Journal5 (2015): 507-513.‏
  64. Ruivo MA., et al. “Surface roughness and filler particles characterization of resin‐based composites”. Microscopy Research and Technique10 (2019): 1756-1767.‏
  65. Santos JH., et al. “Whitening toothpastes effect on nanoparticle resin composite roughness after a brushing challenge: An in vitro study”. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry4 (2019): e334-339.
  66. Schmitt VL., et al. “Effect of the polishing procedures on color stability and surface roughness of composite resins”. International Scholarly Research Notices (2011): 617672.
  67. Senawongse P and Pongprueksa P. “Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing”. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry5 (2007): 265-275.‏
  68. Shimokawa CAK., et al. “In-vitro evaluation of surface properties and wear resistance of conventional and bulk-fill resin-based composites after brushing with a dentifrice”. Operative Dentistry6 (2019): 637-647.‏
  69. Silva FP., et al. “Surface topography, gloss and flexural strength of Pressable ceramic after finishing/polishing protocols”. Brazilian Dental Journal2 (2019): 164-170.‏
  70. Soliman YA., et al. “Surface roughness of nanohybrid composites with different monomers after finishing and polishing with different polishing systems”. Key Engineering Materials 835 (2020): 41-49.
  71. Somacal DC., et al. “Effect of pH cycling followed by simulated tooth brushing on the surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of bulk-fill composite resins”. Operative Dentistry2 (2020): 209-218.‏
  72. Suzuki T., et al. “Toothbrush abrasion of resin composites with different filler concepts”. World Journal of Dentistry2 (2012): 184-193.‏
  73. Suzuki T., et al. “Resistance of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites to toothbrush abrasion with calcium carbonate slurry”. Dental Materials Journal6 (2009): 708-716.‏
  74. Tărăboanţă I., et al. “Roughness variation of a nanohybrid composite resin submitted to acid and abrasive challenges”. Biomaterial and Medical Devices2 (2020): 182-187.
  75. Watanabe T., et al. “Influence of polishing instruments on the surface texture of resin composites”. Quintessence International1 (2007): 61-67.
  76. Wheeler J., et al. “Evaluation of the effects of polishing systems on surface roughness and morphology of dental composite resin”. British Dental Journal7 (2020): 527-532.‏
  77. Zairani O., et al. “The effect of toothbrush bristle stiffness on nanohybrid surface roughness”. International Journal of Physics 884 (2017): 012008.
  78. Zanatta FB., et al. “Biofilm removal and gingival abrasion with medium and soft toothbrushes”. Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry2 (2011): 177-183.‏
×

Citation

Citation: Nehad Wafik Basha., et al. “Surface Roughness Evaluation of Nano Composites with Different Polishing Techniques: (In-Vitro Study)”. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 5.11 (2021): 25-37.




Metrics

Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor0.810

Indexed In



News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is December 15, 2021.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US