Acta Scientific Agriculture (ASAG)(ISSN: 2581-365X)

Research Article Volume 6 Issue 11

Measurement of Green Field Performances in Turfgrass Cultivars with Smartphone Applications in Mediterranean Climate

Emre KARA1*, Mustafa SÜRMEN1 and Hörünaz ERDOGAN2

1Faculty of Agriculture, Field Crops Department, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Türkiye
2Faculty of Agriculture, Field Crops Department, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Türkiye

*Corresponding Author: Emre KARA, Faculty of Agriculture, Field Crops Department, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Türkiye.

Received: September 01, 2022; Published: October 06, 2022


Turf color and canopy cover are among the most basic features that determine the quality of turf areas. Recently, smartphone applications have been developed to measure both turf color and canopy cover. Fast and reliable measurements made in this way save time and expense, while also playing a role in the development of green areas and identifying problems of lawns. For this purpose, turfgrass visual quality (FieldScout GreenIndex+), canopy cover (Canopeo) of 35 different grass cultivars belonging to 7 different species (Festuca arundinacea, Lolium perenne, Poa pratensis, Festuca rubra rubra, Festuca rubra trichopylla, Festuca rubra commutata, Festuca ovina) in Aydın (Türkiye) ecology with Mediterranean climate were determined in a study conducted between 2019-2020. While the results revealed that different grass varieties stood out in each season, the values were higher especially in varieties belonging to the Festuca arundinacea species. In terms of coverage, it was determined that Lolium perenne had the least canopy coverage among the species. Depending on the maturation of the lawns, there may be differences in color and coverage in the following years. However, the preference of Festuca arundinacea varieties can provide more effective results in semi-arid and hot Mediterranean climate.

Keywords: Visual Rating; Canopy Cover; Turfgrass; Green Spaces; Turf Color


  1. Turgeon Alfred J. “Turfgrass management”. No. Edition. 3. Prentice-Hall Inc (1991).
  2. Głąb, Tomasz., et al. “Effect of plant growth regulators on visual quality of turfgrass”. Scientia Horticulturae 267 (2020): 109314.
  3. Knot, Pavel., et al. “The impacts of different management practices on botanical composition, quality, colour and growth of urban lawns”. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 26 (2017): 178-183.
  4. Zhang, Wen., et al. “Evaluation of lawn color and chlorophyll concentration using hyperspectral index”. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science1. (2020).
  5. Pille Jessica D., et al. “Comparing the FieldScout GreenIndex+ Chlorophyll Sensing App to the Minolta SPAD Meter”. Agronomy Conference Proceedings and Presentations 9s (2011).
  6. Pornaro, Cristina., et al. “Drought stress response of turf-type perennial ryegrass genotypes in a Mediterranean environment”. Agronomy 11 (2020): 1810.
  7. Zhang Yichuan., et al. “Effects of leaf area index and degree of canopy cover of green turf and ground cover plants on rainwater interception”. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology2 (2018): 563-568.
  8. Lollato, Romulo P., et al. “Dual-purpose wheat: Improving grazing management using a smartphone app”. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service (2016).
  9. Chung, Yong Suk., et al. “Case study: Estimation of sorghum biomass using digital image analysis with Canopeo”. Biomass and Bioenergy 105 (2017): 207-210.
  10. González-Esquiva JM., et al. “Development of a visual monitoring system for water balance estimation of horticultural crops using low cost cameras”. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 141 (2017): 15-26.
  11. Karcher Douglas E and Michael D Richardson. "Quantifying turfgrass color using digital image analysis”. Crop Science3 (2003): 943-951.
  12. Patrignani Andres and Tyson E Ochsner. "Canopeo: A powerful new tool for measuring fractional green canopy cover”. Agronomy Journal6 (2015): 2312-2320.
  13. Statistical Analysis System Institute. SAS/STAT user's guide 3 (1999).
  14. Demiroglu Gulcan., et al. “Performances of some cool season turfgrass cultivars in Mediterranean environment: II. Festuca arundinacea schreb., Festuca ovina , Festuca rubra spp. rubra L., Festuca rubra spp. trichophylla gaud and Festuca rubra spp. commutata gaud”. Turkish Journal of Field Crops15.2 (2010): 180-187.
  15. Martiniello Pasquale and Egisto D’Andrea. "Cool-season turf grass species adaptability in Mediterranean environments and quality traits of varieties”. European Journal of Agronomy3 (2006): 234-242.
  16. Leinauer Bernd., et al. “Digital image analysis and spectral reflectance to determine turfgrass quality”. Agronomy Journal5 (2014): 1787-1794.
  17. Huylenbroeck Van and Van Bockstaele. "Photosynthetic characteristics of perennial ryegrass and red fescue turf‐grass cultivars”. Grass and Forage Science3 (1999): 267-274.
  18. Russi L., et al. “Turf quality and reliability in varieties of four turfgrass species in contrasting Italian environments”. Grass and Forage Science3 (2004): 233-239.
  19. Kara, Emre., et al. “Effects of mowing height and biogas digestate as a soil amendment on green quality of strong creeping red fescue (Festuca rubra var. rubra)”. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science2 (2020): 72-76.
  20. Arslan Mehmet and Moin Qureshi. "Response of Bermudagrass Grown in Different Soil Media to Drought Stress”. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science1 (2022): 18-24.
  21. Aamlid TS., et al. “Crop coefficients, growth rates and quality of cool‐season turfgrasses”. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science1 (2016): 69-80.
  22. Salman A. "The impact of turf colorants and overseeding practices on the dormant bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon)”. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 19.5 (2021): 3979-3989.
  23. Zhang HB., et al. “Studies on the changes in vegetation coverage of Xilinhaote grassland”. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning2 (2007): 42-46.
  24. Chhetri Manoj and Charles Fontanier. "Use of Canopeo for Estimating Green Coverage of Bermudagrass during Postdormancy Regrowth”. HortTechnology6 (2021): 817-819.
  25. Charif, Khadija., et al. “Effect of the season on establishment of some turf grasses under the climatic conditions in eastern Morocco”. AJCS 15 (2021): 1835-2707.


Citation: Emre KARA., et al. “Measurement of Green Field Performances in Turfgrass Cultivars with Smartphone Applications in Mediterranean Climate". Acta Scientific Agriculture 6.11 (2022): 21-29.


Copyright: © 2022 Emre KARA., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Acceptance rate32%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.014

Indexed In

News and Events

  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is July 10, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US