Mansiben Prajapati, Reeyaben Panchal, Krupa Prajapati, Sarita Sharma* and Meenu Saraf S

Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, School of Science, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

*Corresponding Author: Sarita Sharma, Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, School of Science, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Received: March 28, 2022; Published: April 29, 2022

Abstract

The global concern is population growth and rising food demands. It is unavoidable to implement new agricultural productivity-enhancing practices. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) has showed promise as a sustainable agriculture approach. They have a critical function in increasing soil fertility, promoting plant growth, and suppressing phytopathogens in the development of environmentally friendly, long-term agriculture. Beneficial plant growth-promoting (PGPR) microorganisms can be used as effective biotechnological instruments to boost plant development in a variety of situations, including stressful ones. A rise in the occurrence of abiotic stresses, which have a negative impact on plant growth and productivity in major crops, has been seen all over the world. As a result of such stress elements, plant development will be reduced under stress conditions compared to non-stress ones. There is a growing global desire for effective, ecologically friendly methods to decrease the negative consequences of plant stress. The importance of plant-beneficial microbe interactions under such harsh conditions cannot be overstated. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) are a good option for reducing these stressors and are now routinely used. Plants inoculated with PGPRs undergo morphological and biochemical changes that lead to greater tolerance to abiotic stressors. In this review article we focus on PGPRs, abiotic stress effects on plant growth and PGPRs mechanism in alleviating salinity, drought and heavy metal stress condition for plant growth.

Keywords: Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR); Abiotic Stress; Drought Stress; Salinity; Heavy Metals

References

1. Abeles F B., et al. “Ethylene”. Plant Biology, 2^nd, Academic Press, New York (1992).
2. Arora N K., et al. “Multifaceted plant-associated microbes and their mechanisms diminish the concept of direct and indirect PGPRs”. In Plant microbe symbiosis: Fundamentals and advances (2013): 411-449.
3. Assaha DV., et al. “The role of Na+ and K+ transporters in salt stress adaptation in glycophytes”. Frontiers in Physiology 8 (2017): 509.
4. Awad N., et al. “Ameliorate of environmental salt stress on the growth of Zea mays L. plants by exopolysaccharides producing bacteria”. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 4 (2012): 2033-2044.
5. Beneduzi A., et al. “Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents”. Genetics and Molecular Biology4 (2012): 1044-1051.
6. Chiappero J., et al. “Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria improve the antioxidant status in Mentha piperita grown under drought stress leading to an enhancement of plant growth and total phenolic content”. Industrial Crops and Products 139 (2019): 111553.
7. Costa OY., et al. “Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: ecological function and impact on soil aggregation”. Frontiers in Microbiology 9 (2018): 1636.
8. Dabhi J., et al. “Bioremediation of Heavy Metals: A brand New Methodology to Sustainable Agriculture”. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology6 (2021): 6031-6049.
9. Etesami H and Maheshwari DK. “Use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) with multiple plant growth promoting traits in stress agriculture: Action mechanisms and future prospects”. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 156 (2018): 225-246.
10. Etesami H., et al. “Indole-3-acetic acid and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase: bacterial traits required in rhizosphere, rhizoplane and/or endophytic competence by beneficial bacteria”. Bacterial Metabolites in Sustainable Agroecosystem (2015): 183-258.
11. Forni C., et al. “Mechanisms of plant response to salt and drought stress and their alteration by rhizobacteria”. Plant and Soil1 (2017): 335-356.
12. Glick BR. “The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria”. Canadian Journal of Microbiology2 (1995): 109-117.
13. Glick BR. “Using soil bacteria to facilitate phytoremediation”. Biotechnology Advances3 (2010): 367-374.
14. Glick B R. “Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world”. Microbiological Research1 (2010): 30-39.
15. Goswami D., et al. “Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a review”. Cogent Food and Agriculture1 (2016): 1127500.
16. Gouda S., et al. “Revitalization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable development in agriculture”. Microbiological Research 206 (2018): 131-140.
17. Gupta G., et al. “Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): current and future prospects for development of sustainable agriculture”. Journal of Microbial and Biochemical Technology 2 (2015): 096-102.
18. Isayenkov S V and Maathuis FJ. “Plant salinity stress: many unanswered questions remain”. Frontiers in Plant Science 10 (2019): 80.
19. Kai M., et al. “Bacterial volatiles and their action potential”. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology6 (2009): 1001-1012.
20. Kaushal M and Wani SP. “Rhizobacterial-plant interactions: strategies ensuring plant growth promotion under drought and salinity stress”. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 231 (2016): 68-78.
21. Khoshmanzar E., et al. “Effects of Trichoderma isolates on tomato growth and inducing its tolerance to water-deficit stress”. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology2 (2020): 869-878.
22. Khoshru B., et al. “Current scenario and future prospects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: An economic valuable resource for the agriculture revival under stressful conditions”. Journal of Plant Nutrition 20 (2020): 3062-3092.
23. Khoshru B., et al. “Plant microbiome and its important in stressful agriculture”. In Plant Microbiome Paradigm (2020): 13-48.
24. Krasensky J and Jonak C. “Drought, salt, and temperature stress-induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks”. Journal of Experimental Botany4 (2012): 1593-1608.
25. Lankford C E., et al. “Bacterial assimilation of iron”. CRC Critical Reviews in Microbiology3 (1973): 273-331.
26. Panchal R., et al. “Bacterial Exopolysaccharides: Types, its Biosynthesis and their Application in Different Fields". Acta Scientific Biotechnology3 (2022): 1-9.
27. Pandey V C. “Phytoremediation of heavy metals from fly ash pond by Azolla caroliniana”. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 82 (2012): 8-12.
28. Paul D and Nair S. “Stress adaptations in a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) with increasing salinity in the coastal agricultural soils”. Journal of Basic Microbiology 5 (2008): 378-384.
29. Paustian K., et al. “Climate-smart soils”. Nature 7597 (2016): 49-57.
30. Prasad R., et al. “The microbial symbionts: Potential for crop improvement in changing environments”. In Advancement in crop improvement techniques (2020): 233-240.
31. Rajkumar M., et al. “Potential of siderophore-producing bacteria for improving heavy metal phytoextraction”. Trends in Biotechnology3 (2010): 142-149.
32. Rochlani A., et al. “Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria as Biofertilizers: Application in Agricultural Sustainability". Acta Scientific Microbiology4 (2022): 12-21.
33. Rossi F., et al. “The role of the exopolysaccharides in enhancing hydraulic conductivity of biological soil crusts”. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 46 (2012): 33-40.
34. Ryu CM., et al. “Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis”. Plant Physiology3 (2004): 1017-1026.
35. Saraf M., et al. “Production and optimization of siderophore from plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria”. Scholar press (2017): 1-85.
36. Sarita S., et al. “Phytomining of Heavy Metals: A Green Technology to Sustainable Agriculture”. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology6 (2021a): 7527-7538.
37. Seesuriyachan P., et al. “Optimization of exopolysaccharide overproduction by Lactobacillus confusus in solid state fermentation under high salinity stress”. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry (2012): 110905.
38. Shaikh NB., et al. “Rhizobacteria that Promote Plant Growth and their Impact on Root System Architecture, Root Development, and Function". Acta Scientific Microbiology4 (2022): 53-62.
39. Sharma S., et al. “Exploring the Biotic Stress Tolerance Potential of Heavy Metal Tolerate Rhizobacteria Isolated from Mines Area and Landfill Site". Acta Scientific Microbiology2 (2022): 31-37.
40. Sharma S and Bhatt R. “Enhanced Production and Characterization of Commercially Important Thermostable Amylolytic Enzyme”. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering, and Technology7 (2014): 14525-14536.
41. Sharma S., et al. “Biofilm: Used as A Brand-new Technology in Bioremediation”. Vidya; A Journal of Gujarat University 16.2 (2021b): 9-116.
42. Sharma S., et al. “Isolation of Heavy Metal Tolerant Rhizobacteria from Zawar Mines Area, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India”. Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communication1 (2020): 233-238.
43. Sharma S., et al. “Elucidate the Influence of Heavy Metal on Bacterial Growth Isolated from a Mining Location and A Waste Dump: Using their Inducible Mechanism”. Current Trends in Biomedical Engineering and Biosciences 2 (2021C): 556034.
44. Sharma V., et al. “Stress mitigation strategies of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria mechanisms”. Plant Science Today 8 (2021): 25-32.
45. Shen X., et al. “Comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Pseudomonas”. BMC Genomics1 (2013): 1-20.
46. Srivastava S., et al. “Effect of high temperature on Pseudomonas putida NBRI0987 biofilm formation and expression of stress sigma factor RpoS”. Current Microbiology5 (2008): 453-457.
47. Timmusk S., et al. “Drought-tolerance of wheat improved by rhizosphere bacteria from harsh environments: enhanced biomass production and reduced emissions of stress volatiles”. PloS One5 (2014): e96086.
48. Tiwari S., et al. “Pseudomonas putida attunes morphophysiological, biochemical and molecular responses in Cicer arietinum L. during drought stress and recovery”. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 99 (2016): 108-117.
49. Vardharajula, S., et al. “Drought-tolerant plant growth promoting Bacillus spp.: effect on growth, osmolytes, and antioxidant status of maize under drought stress”. Journal of Plant Interactions 11 (2011): 1-14.
50. Yang J., et al. “Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress”. Trends in Plant Science1 (2009): 1-4.

Citation

Citation: Sarita Sharma., et al. “Rhizobacterial - Plant Interaction Approaches that Enhance Plant Growth Under Abiotic Stress". Acta Scientific Agriculture 6.5 (2022): 67-74.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Sarita Sharma., et al.. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.