Harsha Sharma¹ and Avadhesh Kumar Koshal²*

¹Assistant Professor, Faculty of Science, Motherhood University, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India
²Professor, Faculty of Science, Motherhood University, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India

*Corresponding Author: Avadhesh Kumar Koshal, Professor, Faculty of Science, Motherhood University, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India.

Received: October 06, 2021; Published: December 10, 2021

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are soil bacteria that colonise the rhizosphere and promote plant growth through a range of mechanisms including organic matter mineralization, biological control of soil-borne diseases, biological nitrogen fixation, and root growth promotion. The ability of PGPR to enhance nutrient bioavailability is a crucial characteristic. Several bacterial species have been reported as P-solubilizing microorganisms, while others, such as those that create siderophores for Fe chelation, have been found to boost the solubility of micronutrients. The increased concentration of soluble macro and micronutrients along the soil-root interface has a beneficial effect on the plant nutrition. Furthermore, several pieces of evidence suggest that culturing plants with PGPR can have considerable physiological and molecular effects on plants (e.g., induction of rhizosphere acidification, up-and down regulation of genes involved in ion uptake and translocation), suggesting that soil biota could stimulate plants to be more efficient in trying to extract nutrients from soil and coping with abiotic stresses. However, the molecular mechanisms behind these events, the signals involved, as well as their potential uses in a sustainable agriculture strategy and biotechnological elements for hypothetical rhizosphere engineering, are all still up for debate.

Keywords: Biotechnology; Iron; Nitrogen; PGPR; Soil Bacteria

References

1. Valiente-Banuet A., et al. “Beyond species loss: the extinction of ecological interactions in a changing world”. Functional Ecology 29 (2015): 299-307.
2. Avellaneda Castro VA. “Evaluación agronómica del Rhizobium con inoculación y fertilización nitrogenada en una pastura de trébol blanco (Trifolium repens) y ryegrass perenne (Lolium perenne)”. BS thesis (2007).
3. Williams JG., et al. “DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers”. Nucleic Acids Research 18 (1990): 6531-6535.
4. Oleszek W and Stochmal A. “Triterpene saponins and flavonoids in the seeds of Trifolium species”. Phytochemistry 61 (2002): 165-170.
5. Bordinave, G. Louis Pasteur (1822-1895) Microbes Infection 5.6 (2003) 553-560.
6. Reeve W., et al. “Complete genome sequence of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv trifolii strain WSM2304, an effective microsymbiont of the South American clover Trifolium polymorphum”. Standards in Genomic Sciences 2 (2010): 66-76.
7. Watson LE., et al. “Molecular phylogeny of Old World Trifolium (Fabaceae), based on plastid and nuclear markers”. Plant Systematics and Evolution 224 (2000): 153-171.
8. Admassie A and Matambalya FAST. “Technical efficiency of Small and Medium” (2002).
9. Bhattacharya P and Chakraborty G. “Current status of organic farming in India and other countries”. Indian Journal of Fertilizers9 (2005): 111-123.
10. Dwivedi Vandana. “Organic farming: Policy initiatives, National Seminar on National Policy on Promoting Organic Farming, 130-135”. Scale Enterprises 9.6 (2005): 39-53.
11. Aneja KR. “Experiments in Microbiology. Plant Pathology and Tissue Culture” (2001): 471.

Citation

Citation: Harsha Sharma and Avadhesh Kumar Koshal.“The Influence of Rhizobacteria that Promotes Growth of Plants on the Nutritional Acquisition Process". Acta Scientific Agriculture 6.1 (2022): 08-10.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Harsha Sharma and Avadhesh Kumar Koshal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.