Acta Scientific Agriculture (ISSN: 2581-365X)

Research ArticleVolume 5 Issue 6

Quality Perception in Higher Education - Using SERVQUAL Methodology

Iara Margolis* and Bernardo Providência

Lab2PT, University of Minho, Portugal

*Corresponding Author: Iara Margolis, Lab2PT, University of Minho, Portugal.

Received: March 24, 20211; Published:May 17, 2021

Citation: Iara Margolis and Bernardo Providência. “Quality Perception in Higher Education - Using SERVQUAL Methodology". Acta Scientific Agriculture 5.6 (2021): 32-48.

Abstract

Understanding the student's perception in higher education goes far beyond student retention. Factors such as satisfaction, motivation and irritability points help not only in a more convergent service planning between the institution's efforts in the face of student expectation, but also in better learning. The perceived quality is difficult to measure and subjective. This work aims to understand the perceived quality of the student and analyze the SERQUAL model for its application in higher education. The 5 dimensions of the model were correlated with academic pillars and the sub-items of each dimension were expanded, according to previous studies. The research was conducted with 15% of the universe of students from a higher education course, which represents 69 students, from a private institution. The results were validated in a focus group of 5 students using tools such as the Ishikawa diagram and the Interrelationship Diagram. As a result of the application it was diagnosed that students have a higher expectation than the service offered, which results in a perceived negative quality. Points such as 'parking' and 'operational service', which are not essential characteristics of the educational service, directly impact on the perception of quality and consequently on the student's satisfaction. As a main result it was noticed that the method points out the problems that most bother the students. They tend to analyze the whole and camouflage items in the face of these stressful stimuli. The method proved to be an ally in the detection of problems of perceived-feltquality, but that requires beyond thedetermination of the data to understand the root cause of the results.

 

Keywords: Quality Perception; SERVQUAL; Higher Education; Self-report Methodology; Students Satisfaction

Keywords: Genome-editing; Homologous Recombination; CRISPR/Cas; Indels; Crop Improvements

Bibliography

  1. Meyer C and Schwager A. “Understanding customer experience”. Harvard Business Review2 (2007): 117-126.
  2. Wm Almeida. "On the end of the gratuity of Brazilian public higher education". Research Notebooks 49.173 (2019): 10-27.
  3. Census dand Higher Education. "Statistical notes 2019". Ministry of Education.
  4. "V National Survey of Socioeconomic and Cultural Profile of UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS OF IFES - 2018". Fonoprace (2018): 316.
  5. Aronowitz S and Giroux HA. “The corporate university and the politics of education”. The Educational Forum 64 (2008): 332-339.
  6. File CHP., et al. "Social roles in higher education: Student-client, Teacher-manager-educator, institution of commercial education". Science Administration 15 (2006): 2-27.
  7. Fonseca V. "Importance of emotions in learning: a neuropsychopedagogical approach". Psychopedagogy Magazine102 (2016): 365-384.
  8. Slater SF and Narver JC. “Market orientation and the learning organization”. Journal of Marketing3 (1995): 63-74.
  9. Mark E. “Student satisfaction and the costumer focus in higher education”. Journal of Higher Education Policy Management1 (2013): 2-10.
  10. Kureemun B and Fantina R. “Your customers’ perception of quality: What it means to your bottom line and how to control it”. CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group (2011).
  11. Parasuraman A., et al. “SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale For Measuring Customer Perceptions of Service Quality”. Journal of Retailing1 (1988): 12-40.
  12. IM brook. "Mapping hedonomy and emotional experiences: The perception of the student in higher education from the perspective of emotional design”. Federal University of Pernambuco (Doctorate inDesign) (2020): 472.
  13. Ribeiro IM., et al. "Academic sectors that interfere with student satisfaction in higher education". Acta Scientarium Education (2021): 1-28.
  14. Thomas EH and Galambos N. “What satisfies students? Mining student-opinion data with regression and decision tree analysis”. Research in Higher Education3 (2004): 251-267.
  15. Peng PJ and Samah AJA. “Measuring student’s satisfaction for quality education in a e-learning university”. Unitar e-Journal1 (2006): 11-21.
  16. Gibson A. “Measuring business students satisfaction: a review and summary of the major predictors”. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management3 (2010): 251-259.
  17. Parasuraman A., et al. “A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research”. Journal of Marketing4 (1985): 41-50.
  18. Leblanc G and Nguyen N. “Searching for excellence in business education: An exploratory study of customer impressions of service quality”. International Journal of Educational Management2 (1997): 72-79.
  19. Douglas D., et al. “Measuring student satisfaction at a UK university”. Quality Assurance in Education3 (2006): 251-267.
  20. Bearden WO., et al. “Handbook of Marketing Scales: Multi-item measures for marketing and consumer behavior research”. Sage (2011).
  21. Lourenço CDS and Knop MFT. "Higher education in administration and perception of the quality of services: An application of the SERVQUAL scale". Brazilian Business Management Magazine 39 (2011): 219-233.
  22. Stefano NM., et al. “A fuzzy SERVQUAL based method for ecaluated of servisse quality in the hotel industry”. Procedia CIRP 30 (2015): 433-438.
  23. Hair E and Chirinos JL. "Validation and applicability of modified SERVQUAL surveys to measure the satisfaction of external users in health services". Heredian Medica Magazine2 (2012): 89-95.
  24. Hasan HFA., et al. “Service Quality and Student Satisfaction: A Case Study at Private Higher Education Institutions”. International Business Research3 (2008): 163-175.
  25. Bigné E., et al. “Perceived quality and satisfaction in multiservice organizations: the case of Spanish public service”. Journal of Services Marketing4 (2003): 420-442.
  26. Ademir C and Gülcan, Y. “Student satisfaction in higher education: A Turkish case. Higher Education”. Management and Policy2 (2004): 109-122.
  27. Rastoder A., et al. “Perceptions of Students towards Quality of Services at Private Higher Education Institution in Bosnia and Herzegovina”. European Researcher Series A12 (2015): 783-790.
  28. Sohail MS and Shaikh NM. “Quest for excellence in business education: A study of student impressions of service quality”. International Journal of Education Management1 (2004): 58-65.
  29. Buttle F. “SERVQUAL: review, critique, research agenda”. European Journal of Marketing1 (1996): 8-32.
  30. Asubonteng P., et al. “SERVQUAL revisited: a critical review of service quality”. The Journal of Services Marketing6 (1996): 61-81.
  31. Pariseau SE and Mcdaniel JR. “Assessing service quality in business schools”. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management3 (1997): 204-218.
  32. Galloway, L. “Quality perceptions of internal and external customers: a case study in educational administration”. The TQM Magazine1 (1998): 20-26.
  33. MV Rodrigues. "Actions for quality: strategic and integrated management for the improvement of processes in the pursuit of quality and competitiveness". Elsevier (2014).
  34. Bergman B and Klefsjö B. “Quality from Customer Needs to Customer Satisfaction”. Studentlitteratur AB (2010).
  35. Swartz TA and Brown SW. “Consumer and provider expectations and experiences in evaluating professional service quality”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science2 (1989): 189-195.
  36. Swait JS and Adamowicz W. “The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: a latent class model of decision strategy”. Journal of Consumer Research1 (2001): 189-199.
  37. Weathers D., et al. “The impact of the number of scale points, dispositional factors, and the status quo heuristic on scale reliability and response accuracy”. Journal of Business Research11 (2005): 1516-1524.

Copyright: © 2021 Iara Margolis and Bernardo Providência. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is June 30, 2021.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US