Howard R Moskowitz^1,2*, Sunaina Saharan³, Stephen D Rappaport⁴ and Sharon Wingert¹

¹Tactical Data Group, Stafford, VA, USA
²Mind Genomics Associates, Inc., White Plains, NY, USA
³Government Medical College and Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India
⁴Stephen D. Rappaport Consulting LLC, Norwalk, CT, USA

*Corresponding Author: Howard R Moskowitz, Tactical Data Group, Stafford, VA, USA.

Received: December 11, 2024; Published: December 30, 2024

Abstract

The paper introduces a three-stage, generative AI approach to understanding a topic (use of multivitamins). The objective is to make learning a new topic more “human-centered” in three stages. First, presenting information synthesized and simulated by gen erative AI in the form of a popular story (Stage 1). Second, presenting information in the form of a town hall where questions can be raised, answered, and analyzed (Stage 2). Finally, in the form of a town hall where the audience has different points of view and generative AI can get “into the minds” of the respondents (Stage 3). The approach is rapid, practical, and easily affordable, creating a corpus of interesting material for educational purposes. The goal is to jump-start a learning process by getting the user interested in exploring a topic with easy-to-use generative AI.

Keywords: Consumer Mind-set in Health Supplements; Generative AI in Education; Multivitamin Benefits and Risks; Simulated Town Hall Meetings; AI for Health Decision Making

References

1. Chen Junsong and Willem P Burgers. “Winning the China vitamin war by building a strong brand”. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing1 (2007): 79-95.
2. Djojo Brata Wibawa and Muhtosim Arief. “Exploring the Factors Affecting Consumer Purchase Intention Towards Children Multivitamin Products Based on Purchase Store”. Advanced Science Letters4 (2015): 622-625.
3. Samuel L., et al. “An Analysis of Nutrient Facts Labels of Pediatric Multivitamin and Mineral Supplements: Is There a Risk of Overexposure?” Nutrition and Health4 (2023): 715-720.
4. Dooley PK. “William James on the Human Ways of Being”. The Personalist Forum1 (1990): 75-85.
5. Bali L M., et al. “How Prevalent Are Suggestive Brand Names and Distinctive Assets? An AI-Human Approach”. International Journal of Market Research (2024): 14707853241251954.
6. Huang J and K Huang. “ChatGPT in Government”. In Beyond AI: ChatGPT, Web3, and the Business Landscape of Tomorrow, 271-294. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, (2023).
7. Li K. “Artificial Intelligence as a Partner in Shaw Studies”. In Bernard Shaw, Automata, Robots, and Artificial Intelligence, 69-118. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, (2024).
8. Tang Y., et al. “Enhancing Role-Playing Systems Through Aggressive Queries: Evaluation and Improvement”. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10618 (2024).
9. Noy S and W Zhang. “Experimental Evidence on the Productivity Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence”. Science6654 (2023): 187-192.
10. Preiksaitis C and C Rose. “Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Scoping Review”. JMIR Medical Education 9 (2023): e48785.
11. Reed J M and T M Dodson. “Generative AI Backstories for Simulation Preparation”. Nurse Educator4 (2024): 184-188.
12. Salinas-Navarro D E., et al. “Using Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools to Explain and Enhance Experiential Learning for Authentic Assessment”. Education Sciences1 (2024): 83.
13. Bozkurt A., et al. “Speculative Futures on ChatGPT and Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Collective Reflection from the Educational Landscape”. Asian Journal of Distance Education1 (2023): 53-130.
14. Fulda N and C Gundry. “Conversational AI as Improvisational Co-Creation: A Dialogic Perspective”. In ICCC, 246-250 (2022).
15. Stevens R., et al. “AI for Science: Report on the Department of Energy (DOE) Town Halls on Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Science”. No. ANL-20/17. Argonne National Lab., Argonne, IL (United States), (2020).
16. Veloso P E D R O and R Krishnamurti. “From Black Box to Generative System”. In 107th ACSA Annual Meeting Proceedings, Black Box, 525-533. (2019).
17. Aydın Ö and E Karaarslan. “Is ChatGPT Leading Generative AI? What Is Beyond Expectations?” Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems3 (2023): 118-134.
18. Kim JH., et al. “Do You Trust ChatGPT? Effects of the Ethical and Quality Issues of Generative AI on Travel Decisions”. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing9 (2023): 779-801.
19. Viswanathan S., et al. “What Is Your Current Mindset?” In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-17. April (2022).
20. Karinshak E., et al. “Working with AI to Persuade: Examining a Large Language Model’s Ability to Generate Pro-Vaccination Messages”. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionCSCW1 (2023): 1-29.

Citation

Citation: Howard R Moskowitz., et al. “Multivitamins: Synthesizing Understanding through Simulating Mind-Sets". Acta Scientific Pharmaceutical Sciences 9.1 (2025): 129-139.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2025 Howard R Moskowitz., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.