Acta Scientific Pharmaceutical Sciences (ASPS)(ISSN: 2581-5423)

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 7

An Assessment of Quality of Life of Hypertensive Patients Visiting a Hospital in Warri, Nigeria

Rita O Akonoghrere1*, Ogheneovo C Aghoja1, Omobamidele B Betiku2, Zipporah E Adje1 and Azuka C Oparah3

1Faculty of Pharmacy, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria
2Department of Family Medicine, Lily Hospitals Limited, Warri, Delta State, Nigeria
3Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria

*Corresponding Author: Rita O Akonoghrere, Faculty of Pharmacy, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.

Received: June 02, 2020; Published: June 30, 2020



Purpose: Health related quality of life is a multi-dimensional concept that includes domains related to the physical, mental, emotional and social functioning. It appraises both the positive and negative aspect of life. This can be evaluated using various instruments so as to know areas to improve therapy. This study was done to assess the quality of life of a group of hypertensive patients, and to determine predictors of their quality of life.

Method: This was a descriptive cross- sectional study designed to assess the quality of life of hypertensive patients. The sf-12 questionnaire was used to assess Quality of Life in ambulatory patients. Data was obtained from patients visiting two facilities in Delta state, Nigeria.

Results: The total sample size used was 122 respondents of which 72 were males (58.5%). The mean Physical Component Summary (PCS) of quality of life was 47 ± 7.5; while the mean Mental Component Summary (MCS) of quality of life was 46.7 ± 9.2. The mean systolic blood pressure was 139.6mmHg ± 19.1 while the mean diastolic blood pressure was 82.8mmHg ± 13.3. The Beta value obtained from all the analysis were > 0.05, hence there were no significant predictors of quality of life.

Conclusion: Quality of life was generally low and below the Norm of 50% according to the US standard. The physical component scale however was the most affected. Neither the clinical status nor the socio-demographics of the patients were predictors of their quality of life.

Keywords: Quality of Life; Blood Pressure; Hypertension; SF-12 Questionnaire; Nigeria



  1. Reddy KS. “Hypertension control in developing countries; generic issues”. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension 10.1 (1996): 33-38.
  2. Ferrans CE. “Definitions and conceptual models of quality of life”. In: Lipscomb J, Gotay CC, Snder C, editors, outcomes assessment in cancer. Cambridge, England: Cambridge university (2005): 14-30.
  3. Higginson IJ and Carr AJ. “How can quality of life measures be used in clinical settings?” British Medical Journal 322 (2001): 1297-1300.
  4. Ezzati M., et al. “The comparative risk assessment collaborating group selected major risk factor and regional burden of disease”. Lancet 360 (2002): 1347-1360.
  5. Oparah AC. “Essentials of pharmaceutical care” 5 (2010): 202.
  6. Wang R., et al. “Impact of hypertension on health related quality of life population based study in Shanghai, China”. Public Health 123 (2009): 534-539.
  7. Ware JE., et al. “SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales; a user manual”. Boston: The health institute (1994).
  8. Medical Outcome Trust (2006). 
  9. Mena-Martin FJ., et al. “Health-related quality of life of subjects with known and unknown hypertension: results from the population based Hortega study”. Journal of Hypertension 21 (2003): 1283-1289.
  10. Wiczinski E., et al. “Obesity and health-related quality of life: does social support moderate existing associations?” British Journal of Health Psychology 14 (2009): 717-734.
  11. Renzaho A., et al. “Associations between body mass index and health-related quality of life among Australian adults”. Quality of Life Research 19.4 (2010): 515-520.
  12. Huang IC., et al. “The relationship of excess body weight and health related quality of life: evidence from a population study in Taiwan”. International Journal of Obesity 30 (2006): 1250-1259.
  13. Gusmao JL., et al. “Health-related quality of life and blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with and without complications”. Clinical Science 64.7 (2009): 619-612.
  14. Sivalal S. “Health technology assessment in the Asia Pacific region”. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 25.1 (2009):196-201.
  15. Erickson SR., et al. “Relationship Between Symptoms and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Treated for Hypertension”. Pharmacotherapy 24 (2004): 344-350.
  16. Upali WJ., et al. “Gender difference in health- related quality of life of Australian chronically-ill adults: patient and physician characteristics do matter”. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 11 (2013): 102. 
  17. Al- Mandhari., et al. “Assessment of perceived health status in hypertensive and diabetes mellitus patients at primary health centers in Oman”. International Journal of Preventive Medicine 2.4 (2011): 256-263. 
  18. Bardage C and Isacson DGL. “Hypertension and health-related quality of life: an epidemiological study in Sweden”. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 54 (2001): 172-181.
  19. Youssef RM., et al. “Factors affecting the quality of life of hypertensive patients”. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 11 (2005): 109-118.
  20. Zygmuntowicz M., et al. “Comorbidities and quality of life in hypertensive patients”. Polish Archives of Internal Medicine-Polskie 122.7-8 (2012): 333-340.
  21. Al- Mandhari A., et al. “Assessment of perceived health status in hypertensive and diabetes mellitus patients at primary health centers in Oman”. International Journal of Preventive Medicine 2.4 (2011): 256-263. 
  22. Bardage C., et al. “A swedish population-based study on the relationship between the SF-36 and health utilities to measure health in hypertension”. Blood Pressure 12 (2003): 203-210.
  23. Ware JE Jr., et al. “Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study”. Medicine Care 33.4-1 (1995): AS264-AS279.
  24. Kokiwar PR., et al. “Prevalence of hypertension in a rural community of central India”. The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 60 (2012): 26-29.


Citation: Rita O Akonoghrere., et al. “An Assessment of Quality of Life of Hypertensive Patients Visiting a Hospital in Warri, Nigeria". Acta Scientific Pharmaceutical Sciences 4.7 (2020): 49-54.


Acceptance rate32%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In

News and Events

  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is April 30th, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue".
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
    Use KmsPico to obtain a Windows and Office license.

Contact US