Acta Scientific Pharmaceutical Sciences

Commentary Volume 1 Issue 5

Can Honey Combat Life Threatening Bacterial Infections to Humans?

Shyamapada Mandal1* and Manisha Mandal2

1 Department of Zoology, University of Gour Banga, Malda, India
2 Department of Physiology, MGM Medical College and LSK Hospital, Kishanganj, India

*Corresponding Author: Shyamapada Mandal, Laboratory of Microbiology and Experimental Medicine, Department of Zoology, University of Gour Banga, West Bengal, Malda, India. E-mail:

Received: August 06, 2017; Published: October 03, 2017

Citation: Shyamapada Mandal and Manisha Mandal. “Can Honey Combat Life Threatening Bacterial Infections to Humans?”. Acta Scientific Pharmaceutical Sciences 1.5 (2017).


CLSI: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; MDR: Multidrug Resistant; MIC: Minimum Inhibitory Concentration; NCCLS: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; SNPs: Silver Nanoparticles; ZDI: Zone Diameter of Inhibition


  The incidence of human infection with enteric bacteria is com- mon in India [1], and the commonest bacterial isolates reported were Salmonella enteric serovar Typhi [1] , S. enterica serovar Parayphi A [2], Escherichia coli, Proteus species, and Klebsiella pneumoniae [3]. The isolates, from different clinical samples from patients, had multidrug resistance [1,3], as determined by disk diffusion method and MIC value determination following the NCCLS/CLSI criteria. The MDR isolates had transferable R-plasmids [3,4]. The cholera outbreak, due to the infection of Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El-Tor serotype Ogawa, has also been reported [5]. Currently, β-lactamase producing clinical bacterial isolates (S. Typhi, E. coli, K. pneumonae and P. vulgaris) has been reported [6].

  In order to combat the bacterial antibiotic resistances, as depicted above, several strategies have been developed: synergistic activity between antibiotics [7], antibacterial activity of indigenous plant extracts alone and in combination with antibiotics [8-10], and studies on antibacterial activity and antioxidant activity of natural and commercially available honey samples [11-13]. In addition, curd lactobacilli strains were characterized for their probiotic property and antibacterial activity [14]. The probiotic nature of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG was reported [15] , and found to be effective for diarrheal patients (infants). The current communication justifies the usage of honey against bacterial infections to humans.

Honey Chemistry and Bioactivity

  Honey is a sweet and flavorful natural product that is valued for its high nutritional property and its contribution to human health for many decades [16] . It (honey) was the first bee product used by mankind in ancient times [17] . A large number of substances have been reported to be present in honey, and is considered an impor - tant part of traditional medicine [12]. Among different compounds,a number of components are known to act as antioxidants (phenolic components, flavonoids, ascorbic acid, etc.) and antibacterials, such as H2O2, high sugar contents and lactic acid [16]. The reducing (due to phenolics and sugars) and stabilizing (due to protein contained in honey) capacity of honey make it potential to be used in nano-biotechnology in order to synthesize as well as stabilize metal nanoparticles, including silver nanoparticles (SNPs) [18] .

Antioxidative Capacity

  Malaysian acacia honey contained high concentration of phenolic compounds (341.67 mg of gallic acid equivalent/kg) and flavonoid content (113.06 mg of catechin equivalent/kg), and had excellent antioxidant activity (43.89 %) in DPPH system [19]. Based upon the DPPH scavenging activity, the tualang honeys (59.89%) [20] and Indian honeys (57.5%) [21], had good antioxidant potential. Alzahrani., et al. [22] reported from Saudi Arabia, that the manuka honey had high content of polyphenols, with 899 mg gallic acid/kg, whereas lavender honey had the lower, with 111.42 mg gallic acid/kg. Thus, with different compositions of active compounds in honey samples from different locations, differences in honey properties are to be expected, and hence studies with local untested honey are mandatory [13].

Antibacterial Activity

  It has been reported that the functional activity of honey as a nutrient, as a medicine and as a liniment has been approved in present days based upon the traditional practices, and thus api- therapy (an alternative branch of medicine) has been developed in recent years, offering treatments based on honey and other bee products against many diseases including bacterial infections, and at present a number of honeys are sold with standardized levels of antibacterial activity [12] . Manuka honey, as has been reported from Saudi Arabia, was the most effective against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) with MICs of 6% and 7%, respectively, whereas wild carrot honey was the most effective against P. aeruginosa, with a MIC of 12%; the lavender honey was the least effective against all tested strains [22] . As per the report of Mandal., et al. [11] , honey sample, harvested from Apis indica hive during spring from Purulia, West Bengal (India) had antibacterial activity against E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and S. enterica serovar Typhi. The locally available (khadikraft) honey (Chennai: India) showed growth inhibitory activity against P. aeruginosa and was found to be better than all of the imported varieties of therapeutic honeys, as determined by agar dilution method [23] . Further, the locally produced honeys possess excellent antibacterial activity comparable to the commercial honeys, as has been documented by Man - dal and Mandal [12] , and therefore, it is necessary to study other locally produced untested honeys for their antimicrobial activities. The combined antibacterial activity of commercial honeys and anti - biotics has also been reported earlier [13].

Antibacterial activity of SNPs synthesized with honey

  The use of honey in the synthesis of SNPs in water has been re- ported recently [24]. A completely green and fast method for the synthesis of SNPs using honey and sunlight has been reported by Obot., et al. [25], from Nigeria. The eco-friendly syntheses of SNPs mediated by various bee products (raw honey, royal jelly, honeydew honey and propolis) have been explored, from Mexico [26]. Haiza., et al. [27], from Malaysia, demonstrated that the use of honey, a natural, low cost reducing agent can produce SNPs through green methodology, and thus avoiding the presence of hazardous and toxic solvent and waste materials, and noted SNPs of 11.16 nm are synthesized at ambient conditions using AgNO3 and honey at pH 8.53. As has been reported by Heemasagar., et al.[28], from Tamilnadu, India, the SNPs synthesized with plant extracts had antibacterial activity when it was mixed with honey against E. coli, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumonia, and S. enterica serovar Typhi. Moreover, Venu., et al. [29] reported that honey mediated synthesis of SNPs has advantages over other biological methods.

Honey as the source of antibacterial probiotics

  Lactic acid bacteria including lactobacilli grow in sugar rich low-pH media. Isolation of lactobacilli, with probiotic potentiality and having antibacterial property, from curd samples has been reported earlier [30,31]. Honey has also been reported to be the source of lactic acid bacteria. Aween., et al. [32] isolated Lactobacillus acidophilus that showed inhibitory activity against S. enterica Typhimurium (ZDI; 23 - 30 mm), E. coli (ZDI; 7 - 18 mm and Enterobacter aerogenes (ZDI; 10 - 18 mm). The lactobacilli strains, such as Lactobacillus sp. and Lactobacillus vermiform can be the good candidates for potential application as probiotics in honeybees and also as the natural food preservatives, which, in turn, may be useful in the food industry. It has been reported that the presence of probiotic bacteria Lactobacillus spp. in honeybee (Apis cerana indica) gut play significant role in the general health maintenance of the host [33]. Hasali., et al. [34] isolated four probiotic lactobacilli from Meliponine honey that had antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus epidermidis (ZDIs: 25 - 32 mm), P. aeruginosa (ZDIs: 13 - 16 mm) and Listeria monocytogenes (ZDIs: 14 - 24 mm).

Toxicity and safety profiles

  Honey, thus, possesses anti-microbial properties that dampen the growth or persistence of microorganisms. Nevertheless, microbial contamination of honey occurs in two ways: primary sources include pollen, the digestive tracts of honey bees, dust, air, soil and nectar, while the secondary sources are those arising from honey manipulation by people that include air, food handlers, cross-contamination and equipment [35,36]. Iurlina and Fritz [37] found the existence of Bacillus spp. (B. cereus, B. pumilus and B. laterosporus) in honey samples in Argentina. Of all food items tested, only honey contained Clostridium botulinum, and thus, honey has been identified as an avoidable source of C. botulinum spores [38]. According to Kuplulu., et al. [39], honey samples from retail market in Ankara, Turkey, had C. botulinum contamination among 12.5 % of samples. Al-Waili., et al.[40] reported that in Finland, C. botulinumspores were detected in 8 of the 114 Finnish and in 12 of the 76 imported honey samples, while 25 % of the honey products in the US contained C. botulinum, and the honey consumption was associated with 15 % of the cases of infant botulism reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. As has been reported by Adenekan., et al.,[41], the honey samples, procured from various regions of Ogun State, Nigeria, were found to be contaminated with bacteria, such as Clostridium spp., Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus spp., and E. coli, at different levels and counts. Thus, hygienic quality of the honey samples is not maintained in a scientific way, and hence the situation poses a significant risk on public health. However, no scientific reports on the honey mediated bacterial pathogens are available in this part of the globe, and therefore, determining the microbiological risk factors in indigenous honey available in local niches that people consume would decrease the incidence of the potential diseases.

Concluding Remarks

  The honeys are excellent sources of antioxidants with attribution to antibacterial activity. The honey can be utilized in pharmaceutical preparations and in the preparation of functional foods fortified with probiotics (found in honey) for the betterment of public health, in region, particularly in developing countries of the globe, where drug resistant bacterial infection is common. Based upon the antibiotic resistance pattern, the probiotic lactobacilli from honey can also be used in combination with antibiotics in combating bacterial multidrug resistances. However, the antibacterial and antioxidative activity of new untested natural honey samples available in local niches are required to be studied extensively for scientific validation, while the probiotic characterization of lactobacilli from honey samples is an urgent and important task. The biosynthesis of SNPs mediated with indigenous honeys that have not been studied earlier is imperative to explore their capacity to synthesize SNPs having potential antibacterial activity against bacteria capable of causing life-threatening infection to humans. However, safety profiling of natural untested honey, to be utilized as medicine and food, must be done before application.

Conflict of Interest

There was no conflict of interest.


  1. Mandal S., et al. “Antimicrobial resistance pattern of Salmonella Typhi isolates in Kolkata, India during 1991-2001: A retrospective study”. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases 55.2 (2002): 58-59.
  2. Mandal S., et al . “Antibiotic resistance of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A in India: Emerging and reemerging prob- lem”. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 52.3 (2006): 163-166.
  3. Mandal S., et al . “Plasmid-encoded multidrug resistance of Salmonella typhi and some enteric bacteria in and around Kolkata, India: A preliminary study”. The Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences 4.3 (2004): 2.
  4. Mandal S., et al . “R-factor in Salmonella entericaserovar Ty - phi: Transfer to and acquisition from Escherichia coli”. Japa- nese Journal of Infectious Diseases 56.2 (2003): 65-67.
  5. Mandal S., et al . “Plasmid mediated antibiotic resistance of Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor serotype Ogawa associated with an outbreak in Kolkata, India”. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine 3.8 (2010): 637-641.
  6. Mandal S. “Detection of extended spectrum β-lactamase pro - duction among multidrug resistant enteric bacteria by disc diffusion methods”. Cell Communications 1.1 (2014): 4-10
  7. Mandal S., et al . “Antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin and tri - methoprim, alone and in combination, against Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor serotype Ogawa isolates”. Polish Journal of Microbiology 58.1 (2009): 57-60
  8. Mandal S., et al . “Synergistic anti-Staphylococcus aureus activ - ity of amoxicillin in combination with Emblica officinalis and Nymphae odorata extracts”. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine 3.9 (2010): 711-714.
  9. Mandal S., et al . “ In vitro antibacterial activity of three Indian spices against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus”. Oman Medical Journal 26.5 (2011): 319-323.
  10. Mandal S., et al . “Enhancing chloramphenicol and trime- thoprim in vitro activity by Ocimum sanctum Linn. (Lamiac - eae) leaf extract against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi”. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine 5.3 (2012): 220-224.
  11. Mandal S., et al . “Antibacterial activity of honey against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Sal- monella enterica serovar Typhi”. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropi - cal Medicine 3.12 (2-10): 961-964.
  12. Mandal S., et al . “Honey: medicinal property and antibacte- rial activity”. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 1.2 (2011): 157-163.
  13. Saha A., et al . “ In vitro assessment of two commercial honey samples for antibacterial and antioxidant activities”. Austin Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1.1 (2015): 1-5.
  14. Halder., et al . “Indigenous probiotic lactobacillus isolates pre- senting antibiotic like activity against human pathogenic bac - teria”. Biomedicines 5.2 (2017): 31.
  15. Mandal M., et al . “Detection of intestinal colonization of pro- biotic Lactobacillus rhamnosusby stool culture in modified selective media”. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedi - cine 2.3 (2012): 205-210
  16. Cooper R. “Honey as an effective antimicrobial treatment for chronic wounds: is there a place for it in modern medicine?”. Chronic Wound Care Management and Research 1 (2014): 15-22.
  17. Crane E. “A book of honey”. Ox Univ Press UK 1980: 288-290
  18. Balasooriya ER., et al , “Honey mediated green synthesis of nanoparticles: new era of safe nanotechnology”. Journal of Nanomaterials (2017).
  19. Moniruzzaman M., et al . “Physicochemical and antioxidant properties of malaysian honeys produced by Apis cerana, Apis dorsata and apis mellifera”. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 13 (2013): 43.
  20. Moniruzzaman M., et al . “Two-year variations of phenolics, flavonoids and antioxidant contents in acacia honey”. Molecules 18.12 (2013b): 14694-14710.
  21. Saxena S., et al . “Physical, Biochemical and antioxidant prop- erties of some Indian honeys”. Food Chemistry 118.2 (2010): 391-397.
  22. Alzahrani HA., et al . “Antibacterial and antioxidant potency of floral honeys from different botanical and geographical origins”. Molecules 17.9 (2012): 10540-10549.
  23. Mullai V., et al . “Bactericidal activity of different types of hon- ey against clinical and environmental isolates of Pseudomo - nas aeruginosa”. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 13.4 (2007): 439-441.
  24. Philip D. “Honey mediated green synthesis of silver nanopar- ticles”. Spectrochim Acta Part A 75.3 (2010): 1078-1081.
  25. Obot IB., et al . “Sunlight-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles using honey and its promising anticorrosion potentials for mild steel in acidic environments”. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science 4.6 (2013): 1013-1018.
  26. Mendoza-Resendez R., et al. “Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles mediated by bee products”. Trends in Nano- technology” International conference 13th edition (2012).
  27. Haiza H., et al . “Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using local honey”. Nano Hybrids 4 (2013): 87-98
  28. Heemasagar D., et al . “Enhanced antimicrobial activity of honey with green synthesized AgNPs by using Tabernae- montana coronaria (Jacq.) wild flower extract”. Indo Ameri- can Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 4 (2014): 615-626.
  29. Venu R., et al . “Bio-directed synthesis of platinum nanopar- ticles using aqueous honey solutions and their catalytic applications”. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical 384 (2011): 733-738.
  30. Halder D., et al . “Curd lactobacilli with probiotic potential - ity”. Translational Biomedicine 6(2:8) (2015): 1-6.
  31. Halder D., et al . “Antibacterial potentiality of commercially available probiotic lactobacilli and curd lactobacilli strains, alone and in combination, against human pathogenic bacte- ria”. Translational Biomedicine 7(2:61) (2016): 1-7.
  32. Aween MM., et al . “Evaluation on antibacterial activity of Lac- tobacillus acidophilus strains isolated from honey”. American Journal of Applied Sciences 9.6 (2012): 807-817.
  33. Mahesh P., et al . “Detection of novel probiotic bacterium Lac- tobacillus spp. in the workers of Indian honeybee. Apis cerana indica”. International Journal of Environmental Sciences 2.3 (2012): 1135-1143
  34. Hasali NHM., et al . “Identification of lactic acid bacteria from Meliponine honey and their antimicrobial activity against pathogenic bacteria”. American-Eurasian Journal of Sustain- able Agriculture 9.6 (2015): 1-6.
  35. Migdal., et al . “Microbiological decontamination of natural honey by irradiation”. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 57 (2007): 285-288.
  36. Finola MS., et al . “Microbiological and chemical characteriza - tion of honeys from central Argentina”. Food Chemistry 100.4 (2007): 1649-1653.
  37. Iurlina MO., et al . “Characterization of microorganisms in Ar- gentinean honeys from different sources”. International Jour - nal of Food Microbiology 105.3 (2005): 297-304.
  38. Stephen SA., et al . “Honey and other environmental risk fac- tors for infant botulism”. Journal of Pediatrics 94.2 (1979): 331-336.
  39. Kuplulu O., et al . “A Incidence of Clostridium botulinum spores in honey in Turkey”. Food Control 17.3 (2006): 222-224.
  40. Al-Waili N., et al . “Antibiotic, pesticide, and microbial contami- nants of honey: human health hazards”. The Scientific World Journal (2012).
  41. Adenekan MO., et al . “Nutritional and microbiological compo- nents of honey samples obtained from Ogun state, southwest- ern Nigeria”. European Journal of Sustainable Development 1.2 (2012): 271-286.

Copyright: © 2017 Shyamapada Mandal and Manisha Mandal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

News and Events

  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is July 15, 2020.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US