Acta Scientific Paediatrics (ISSN: 2581-883X)

Research Article Volume 9 Issue 3

Burden and Distribution of Malnutrition Among Children Aged 12–60 Months: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Anthropometric Indicators and the Absence of Catch-Up Growth

Shawaiz Malik, Hassan Shahzad, Ghazala Fazal, Muhammad Waqar Shah and Daniyal Ahmed*

Department of Public Health, Health Services Academy, Pakistan

*Corresponding Author: Daniyal Ahmed, Department of Public Health, Health Services Academy, Pakistan

Received: February 17, 2026; Published: July 29, 2026

Abstract

Background: Child malnutrition remains a critical global public health challenge, with stunting, wasting, and underweight affecting millions of children and contributing to preventable morbidity, mortality, and long-term developmental consequences. Despite international efforts, progress toward achieving global nutrition targets remains insufficient, particularly in vulnerable populations. Understanding the burden and distribution of malnutrition across multiple anthropometric indicators is essential for designing effective, evidence-based interventions.

Objective: This study aimed to comprehensively characterize the burden and distribution of child malnutrition across multiple anthropometric indicators in children aged 12–60 months, examine age- and sex-specific patterns of nutritional deficits, and evaluate evidence for catch-up growth across childhood.

Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 330 children aged 12–60 months. Anthropometric measurements including height-for-age, weight-for-age, and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) were assessed and converted to percentile distributions. Data were stratified by age and sex, and statistical analyses including chi-square tests and trend analyses were performed to evaluate differences in malnutrition prevalence across demographic subgroups and to assess evidence of nutritional recovery with increasing age. Results: Overall, 51.8% of children fell below the 5th percentile for height-for-age (stunting), 41.5% for MUAC (wasting), and 24.2% for weight-for-age (underweight), with negligible representation in upper percentile categories. Height-for-age deficits were significantly more severe than weight-for-age and MUAC deficits (χ², p < 0.001). Male children demonstrated significantly higher burden of severe malnutrition across all indicators, particularly for stunting (106 males vs. 65 females below 5th percentile; χ², p < 0.05). Age-stratified analysis revealed peak malnutrition prevalence at 12–24 months across all indicators, with the 24-month age group showing the highest burden of severe stunting (28.7% of all stunted children), underweight (27.5%), and wasting (16.1%). Despite significant variation in anthropometric distributions across age categories (p < 0.001), trend analyses revealed no statistically significant linear improvement with increasing age for any indicator (all p > 0.05), indicating absence of meaningful catch-up growth.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates a severe burden of both chronic and acute malnutrition among children aged 12–60 months, with stunting representing the predominant form of nutritional deficit. The absence of catch-up growth across age groups and the concentration of severe deficits during the critical 12–24 month period underscore the urgent need for early, sustained, and comprehensive nutritional interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life. Gender disparities, with males disproportionately affected, warrant further investigation and may necessitate sex-specific intervention strategies. Addressing this crisis requires integrated, multisectoral approaches encompassing nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive interventions to achieve sustainable improvements in child health and development.

Keywords: Child Malnutrition; Stunting; Wasting; Anthropometry; Catch-Up Growth

References

  1. UNICEF, WHO & World Bank Group. “Levels and trends in child malnutrition: UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Group Joint Child Malnutrition Estimates: Key findings of the 2025 edition”. New York: UNICEF and WHO (2025).
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). “WHO guideline on the prevention and management of wasting and nutritional oedema (acute malnutrition) in infants and children under 5 years”. Geneva: World Health Organization (2024).
  3. Benjamin-Chung J., et al. “Causes and consequences of child growth faltering in low-resource settings”. Nature 7979 (2023): 568-576.
  4. Soliman A., et al. “Early and Long-term Consequences of Nutritional Stunting: From Childhood to Adulthood”. Acta Biomedica 1 (2021): e2021168.
  5. Sideropoulos V., et al. “Childhood stunting and cognitive development: a meta-analysis”. Journal of Global Health 15 (2025): 04257.
  6. Dewey KG and Begum K. “Long-term consequences of stunting in early life”. Maternal and Child Nutrition 3 (2011): 5-18.
  7. Panjwani A and Heidkamp R. “Can Children Catch up from the Consequences of Undernourishment? Evidence from Child Linear Growth, Developmental Epigenetics, and Brain and Neurocognitive Development”. Advances in Nutrition2 (2022): 371-391.
  8. Prendergast AJ and Humphrey JH. “The stunting syndrome in developing countries”. Paediatrics and International Child Health 4 (2014): 250-265.
  9. Becker P., et al. “Measurement of mid-upper arm circumference to screen for childhood malnutrition: General applicability and use in special populations”. Nutrition in Clinical Practice5 (2024): 1060-1078.
  10. Garretson S., et al. “Analysing concordance between MUAC, MUACZ, and WHZ in diagnosing acute malnutrition among children under five in Somalia”. Journal of Global Health 15 (2025): 04258.
  11. Laillou A., et al. “Optimal Screening of Children with Acute Malnutrition Requires a Change in Current WHO Guidelines as MUAC and WHZ Identify Different Patient Groups”. PLOS ONE7 (2014): e101159.
  12. Wells JC., et al. “Associations of economic and gender inequality with global obesity prevalence: Understanding the female excess”. Social Science and Medicine3 (2019): 482-490.
  13. Septyanto AW., et al. “The Impact of Multisectoral Nutrition Interventions on Stunting Rates Among Children Under Five Years Old: A Systematic Review”. The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research4 (2025): 215-228.
  14. Lo´pez-Ejeda N., et al. “Public Health Implications of Wasting and Stunting Relationship in Children under Five Years Highly Vulnerable to Undernutrition in Guatemala: The REDAC Study”. Nutrients19 (2022): 3945.
  15. Leroy JL., et al. “Using height-for-age differences (HAD) instead of height-for-age z-scores (HAZ) for the meaningful measurement of population-level catch-up in linear growth in children less than 5 years of age”. BMC Pediatrics 15 (2015): 145.
  16. Golden MHN. “Is complete catch-up possible for stunted malnourished children?”. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition1 (1994): S58-S71.
  17. Hermanussen M., et al. “Catch-up growth is a better indicator of undernutrition than thresholds for stunting”. Public Health Nutrition17 (2020): 3179-3187.
  18. Marphatia AA., et al. “Associations of gender inequality with child malnutrition and mortality across 96 countries”. Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics 1 (2016): e6.
  19. Menber Y., et al. “Diagnostic accuracy of MUAC for assessment of acute malnutrition among children aged 6–59 months in Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis”. Frontiers in Nutrition 12 (2025): 1536386.
  20. Feyissa YM., et al. “Routinely MUAC screening for severe acute malnutrition should consider the gender and age group bias in the Ethiopian non-emergency context”. PLOS ONE4 (2020): e0230502.
  21. Grellety E., et al. “Comparison of weight-for-height and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) in a therapeutic feeding programme in South Sudan: is MUAC alone a sufficient criterion for admission of children at high risk of mortality?”. Public Health Nutrition14 (2016): 2575-2581.
  22. Government of Timor-Leste. “The National Multisector Nutrition Action Plan 2024-2030” (2025).
  23. Casu L and Husain A. “Operationalizing Multisectoral Nutrition Programs to Accelerate Progress: A Nutrition Governance Perspective”. Washington, DC: World Bank (2020).

Citation

Citation: Daniyal Ahmed., et al. “Burden and Distribution of Malnutrition Among Children Aged 12–60 Months: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Anthropo- metric Indicators and the Absence of Catch-Up Growth". Acta Scientific Paediatrics 9.3 (2026): 01-12.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2026 Daniyal Ahmed., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.197

Indexed In




News and Events


  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be provided with the Publication Certificate after their successful publication
  • Last Date for submission
    Authors are requested to submit manuscripts on/before August 10, 2026, for the upcoming issue of 2026.

Contact US









ff

© 2024 Acta Scientific, All rights reserved.