Acta Scientific Paediatrics (ISSN: 2581-883X)

Research Article Volume 3 Issue 4

Comparative Study of Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Conventional Microdiscectomy

MA Basit1, Richa Sharma2* and Fayaz W Menon1

1Orthopedic Spine Surgeon, Mannat Hospital, India
2Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, SLBSGMCH, India

*Corresponding Author: Richa Sharma, Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, SLBSGMCH, India.

Received: February 18, 2020; Published: March 03, 2020

×

  The aim of this trial was to compare TFED to conventional Microdiscectomy (Micro). The inclusion criteria were: patients of age between 20 - 60, a single level disc prolapse with exiting and/or traversing nerve root compression not responding to conservative therapy 80 patients, age 25 - 70 years, with single level lumbar prolapse and radiculopathy, were recruited. Functional improvements were maintained at 2 years in both groups with less ongoing pain after TFED.

Keywords: Lumbar Discectomy; Microdiscectomy; Transforaminal; Endoscopic Surgery

×

References

  1. He J., et al. “Microendoscopic discectomy vs open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis”. European Spine Journal 25.5 (2016): 1373-1381.
  2. Haar M. “True random number generator” (1998).
  3. Godschalx A. “Caveats of monitored anesthesia for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic spinal surgery”. In: Lewandrowski K et al (eds) Minimally invasive spinal fusion techniques. Summit Communications, LLC, NY (2008): 37-47.
  4. Fairbank JC and Pynsent PB. “The Oswestry Disability Index”. Spine 25.22 (2000): 2940-2952.
  5. Price D., et al. “The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measurements for clinical and experimental pain”. Pain 17.1 (1983): 45-56.
  6. Jenkinson C., et al. “Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age”. BMJ 306 (1993): 1437-1444.
  7. Odom GL., et al. “Cervical disk lesions”. Journal of the American Medical Association 166.1 (1958): 23-28.
  8. Brazier J., et al. “The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36”. Journal of Health Economics 21 (2002): 271-292.
  9. Whitehead SJ and Ali S. “Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities”. British Medical Bulletin 96 (2010): 5-21.
  10. Iprenburg M and Godschalx A. “Transforaminal endoscopic surgery in lumbar disc herniation in an economic crisis—the TESSYS method”. US Musculoskeletal Review 3 (2008): 47-49.
  11. Ward SR., et al. “Architectural analysis and intraoperative measurements demonstrate the unique design of the multifidus muscle for lumbar spine stability”. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 91.1 (2009): 176-185.
  12. Kambin P. “Arthroscopic Microdiscectomy Minimal Intervention”. In: Kambin P (ed) Spinal Surgery. Text Urban and Schwarzenberg Baltimore, MD (1991): 67-100.
  13. Hoogland T and Scheckenbach C. “Die endoskopische trans-foraminale diskektomie bei lumbalen bandscheibenforfallen”. Orthopädische Praxis 34 (1998): 352-355.
  14. Kim M., et al. “Targeted percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic diskectomy in 295 patients: comparison with results of microscopic discectomy”. Surgical Neurology 68.6 (2007): 623-631.
  15. Gibson JNA and Waddell G. “Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse”. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 18 (2007): CD001350.
  16. Yeung AT and Tsou P. “Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases”. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27.7 (2002): 722-731.
  17. Hoogland T., et al. “Transforaminal posterolateral endoscopic discectomy with or without the combination of a low-dose chymopapain: a prospective randomized study in 280 consecutive cases”. Spine 31.24 (2006): E890-E897.
  18. Gibson JNA., et al. “Transforaminal endoscopic spinal surgery: the future ‘gold standard’ for discectomy? A Review”. Surgeon 10.5 (2012): 290-296.
  19. Smith N., et al. “Systematic review of microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation”. European Spine Journal 22.11 (2013): 2458-2465.
  20. Schubert M and Hoogland T. “Endoscopic transforaminal nucleotomy with foraminoplasty for lumbar disk herniation”. Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie 17.6 (2005): 641-661.
  21. Fritsch EW., et al. “The failed back surgery syndrome: reasons, intraoperative findings and long-term results: a report of 182 operative treatments”. Spine 21.5 (1996): 626-633.
  22. Hsu H-T., et al. “Learning curve of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy”. European Spine Journal 22.4 (2013): 727-733.
  23. Hoogland T., et al. “Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation”. Spine 33.9 (2008): 973-978.
×

Citation

Citation: Richa Sharma., et al. “Comparative Study of Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Conventional Microdiscectomy”. Acta Scientific Paediatrics 3.4 (2020): 01-04.




Metrics

Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.197

Indexed In




News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is July 30, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US