Total Analysis of Functional Outcome of Lateral Approach in Hip Arthroplasty
Rajesh Dharia*, Simran Dharia and Vishakha Dharia
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Consultant Orthopedic Surgeon, Mumbai, India
*Corresponding Author: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Consultant Orthopedic Surgeon, Mumbai, India.
Received:
October 06, 2025; Published: January 12, 2026
Abstract
Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) stands as the definitive treatment for degenerative hip disorders. Various approaches have been proposed for THA, each with its own set of advantages and disadvantages. This study aimed to analyse functional outcomes of the lateral approach to hip for total hip replacement.
Materials and Methods: Through a retrospective cohort study, THA candidates over a 15 year period were analyzed. Patients who underwent surgery via the lateral approach were included. Demographic characteristics of patients and postoperative outcomes were analysed Patients were followed up for 15 years to evaluate their functional outcomes using the Harris Hip Score (HHS).
Results: A total of 250 THA candidates, were evaluated in this study. demographic data revealed a significant difference in height and body mass index whereas age and weight showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). The mean HHS and range of motion significantly improved after 6 months (P < 0.001). No significant deterioration in range of movements was observed ar 15 yr follow up.
Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate significant benefits in the outcomes of the lateral approach for THA. The choice of the optimal THA approach remains contingent on the surgeon’s experience and the patient’s preference.
Keywords: Analytical Study; Patient Outcome Assessment; Total Hip Replacement; Dislocation; External Rotation
References
- Hsu H and Nallamothu SV. “Hip Osteonecrosis”. StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2022. StatPearls Publishing LLC; Treasure Island, FL, US: (2022).
- Alecci V., et al. “Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: Perioperative findings”. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 12 (2011): 123-129.
- Varacallo M., et al. “Total Hip Arthroplasty Techniques”. StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2022. StatPearls Publishing LLC; Treasure Island, FL, US. StatPearls (2022).
- Petis S., et al. “Surgical approach in primary total hip arthroplasty: Anatomy, technique and clinical outcomes”. Canadian Journal of Surgery 58 (2015): 128-139.
- Galakatos GR. “Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty”. Molecular Medicine (2018): 115537-11541.
- Petis S., et al. “Comparing the anterior, posterior and lateral approach: Gait analysis in total hip arthroplasty”. Canadian Journal of Surgery 61 (2018): 50-57.
- Miller LE., et al. “Does surgical approach affect outcomes in total hip arthroplasty through 90 days of follow-up? A systematic review with meta-analysis”. Journal of Arthroplasty 33 (2018): 1296-1302.
- Joules BM and Bogoch ER. “Posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis”. Cochrane Database System Review 19 (2006): Cd003828.
- Siguier T., et al. “Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: A study of 1037 total hip replacements”. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 426 (2004): 164-173.
- Gharanizade K., et al. “A comparative evaluation of primary total hip arthroplasty via lateral and posterolateral approaches”. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 3 (2016): e3901.
- Vishwanathan K., et al. “Is the modified Harris hip score valid and responsive instrument for outcome assessment in the Indian population with pertrochanteric fractures?” Journal of Orthopaedics 15 (2018): 40-46.
- Söderman P and Malchau H. “Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement?” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 384 (2001): 189-197.
- Shahgheraghi GHM and Hashemi FCM. “Cementless hip arthroplasty in southern iran, midterm outcome and comparison of two designs”. Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences 40 (2015): 418-424.
- Tokgöz E. “Total Hip Arthroplasty: Medical and Biomedical Engineering and Science Concepts”. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. Surgical approach comparisons in total hip arthroplasty (2022): 45-70.
- Lespasio MJ., et al. “Osteonecrosis of the hip: A primer”. Permanente Journal 23 (2019): 18-100.
- Revell MP., et al. “Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in osteonecrosis of the femoral head”. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am.3 (2006): 98-103.
- Yue C., et al. “Comparison of direct anterior and lateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA)”. Medicine 94 (2015): e2126.
- van Dijk CM., et al. “Surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty - pros and cons”. Orthopaedic Trauma 23 (2009): 27-34.
- Kiyama T., et al. “Hip abductor strengths after total hip arthroplasty via the lateral and posterolateral approaches”. Journal of Arthroplasty 25 (2010): 76-80.
- Rosenlund S., et al. “Patient-reported outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Comparison between lateral and posterior approach”. Acta Orthopaedic 88 (2017): 239-247.
- Putananon C., et al. “Comparison of direct anterior, lateral, posterior and posterior-2 approaches in total hip arthroplasty: Network meta-analysis”. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology 28 (2018): 255-267.
Citation
Copyright
Open Access by
Acta Scientific is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
