Direct Evaluation of Gluteus Medius Tendon Healing in Patients Previously Operated on with Bio-inductive Collagen Patches
Dante Parodi1,2, José Tomás Bravo3*, Daniela Seidel4, Diego Villegas1 and Carlos Tobar1
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
2Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Finis Terrae, Santiago, Chile
3Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica, Chile
4The American British Cowdray Medical Center, México City, México
*Corresponding Author: José Tomás Bravo, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.
Received:
November 26, 2024; Published: January 24, 2025
Abstract
Introduction: Gluteus medius (GM) partial and complete tears frequently cause lateral hip pain. Conservative treatment of these injuries presents significant challenges. In cases where nonsurgical management proves ineffective, open and endoscopic repair techniques may be employed. Collagen patches have been proposed as augmentation methods to mitigate nonhealing rates. However, no study has directly assessed healing through secondary evaluation. This study presents the first series of cases in which direct healing was observed following repair of the GM tendon with bio-inductive collagen patches.
Methods: This is a prospective, cohort observational study. In all cases, the author (DP) performed endoscopic GM repair using a collagen patch, Regeneten®, between 2019 and 2024.
Cases in which a second look, open or endoscopic, was performed by any cause were included. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), iHOT-12, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores preoperatively and postoperatively at the first surgery were recorded. The causes of the second look and evaluation of GM healing were assessed in all cases. Complications during the follow-up were recorded.
Results: Thirty consecutive patients underwent surgery for a gluteus medius partial tear with our endoscopic technique. Three cases (10%) required a second look to evaluate GM healing. All cases were women, with an average age of 59 (42-72) years and an average pain of 3.33 (2-5) years.
The preoperative mHHS, iHOT-12, and VAS were 55.33 (34-67), 57 (43-58) and 7 (6-8) respectively. The postoperative mHHS, iHOT-12, and VAS were 82.33 (80-85), 79.66 (77-82), and 1.66 (1-2), respectively at 6-month after the first surgery. Second-look arthroscopy was performed due to intra-articular pain, total hip arthroplasty due to hip osteoarthritis, and late collected hematoma secondary to trauma. The mean time from the first to the second surgery was 2.61 (0.83-4) years.
Direct tendon healing was observed in all cases, with complete dissolution of the collagen patch. The first surgery using a collagen patch did not cause any complications.
Conclusion: All cases evaluated through second-look surgery demonstrated complete healing of the previously repaired GM tear with a collagen patch observed directly. No complications were associated with the initial endoscopic surgery. The present study is the first to report on this matter in hip surgery.
Keywords: Gluteus Medius; Tendon Healing; Bio-inductive; Collagen; Patches
References
- Christofilopoulos P., et al. “Gluteus maximus tendon transfer for chronic abductor insufficiency: the Geneva technique”. Hip International: The Journal of Clinical and Experimental Research on Hip Pathology and Therapy6 (2021): 751-758.
- Robertson WJ., et al. “Anatomy and dimensions of the gluteus medius tendon insertion”. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery: Official Publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and The International Arthroscopy Association 2 (2008): 130-136.
- Tsutsumi M., et al. “The Gluteus Medius Tendon and Its Insertion Sites: An Anatomical Study with Possible Implications for Gluteus Medius Tears”. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 2 (2019): 177-184.
- Redmond JM., et al. “Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome”. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 4 (2016): 231-240.
- Thomassen PJB., et al. “Endoscopic Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome - A Case Series of 11 Patients”. Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports 1 (2019): 6-10.
- Kenanidis E., et al. “Lesions of the abductors in the hip”. EFORT Open Reviews 8 (2020): 464-76.
- Ebert JR., et al. “A review of surgical repair methods and patient outcomes for gluteal tendon tears”. Hip International: The Journal of Clinical and Experimental Research on Hip Pathology and Therapy 1 (2015): 15-23.
- Kenanidis E., et al. “A roadmap to develop clinical guidelines for open surgery of acute and chronic tears of hip abductor tendons”. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy: Off Journal ESSKA5 (2021): 1420-1431.
- Karpinski MR and Piggott H. “Greater trochanteric pain syndrome. A report of 15 cases”. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 67 (1985): 762-763.
- Dwek J., et al. “MR imaging of the hip abductors: Normal anatomy and commonly encountered pathology at the greater trochanter”. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America 13 (2005): 691-704.
- Connell DA., et al. “Sonographic evaluation of gluteus medius and minimus tendinopathy”. European Radiology 13 (2003): 1339-1347.
- Kingzett-Taylor A., et al. “Tendinosis and tears of gluteus medius and minimus muscles as a cause of hip pain: MR imaging findings”. American Journal of Roentgenology 173 (1999): 1123-1126.
- Bunker TD., et al. “Rotator-cuff tear of the hip”. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 79 (1997): 618-620.
- Kagan A 2nd. “Rotator-cuff tear of the hip”. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 1 (1998): 182-183.
- Robertson WJ., et al. “Anatomy and dimensions of the gluteus medius tendon insertion”. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery: Official Publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and The International Arthroscopy Association2 (2008): 130-136.
- Sher JS., et al. “Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders”. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 77 (1995): 10-15.
- Yamanaka K and Matsumoto T. “The joint side tear of the rotator cuff: a follow-up study by arthrography”. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 304 (1994): 68-73.
- Robertson WJ., et al. “Anatomy and dimensions of the gluteus medius tendon insertion”. Arthroscopy 24 (2008): 130-136.
- Molly A Day., et al. “Repair of gluteus medius tears with bioinductive collagen patch augmentation: initial evaluation of safety and imaging”. Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery3 (2022): 185-190.
- , et al. “Endoscopic repair of partial-thickness undersurface tears of the abductor tendon: Clinical outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up”. Arthroscopy 34 (2018): 1193-1199.
- Chandrasekaran S., et al. “Outcomes of Open Versus Endoscopic Repair of Abductor Muscle Tears of the Hip: A Systematic Review”. Arthroscopy 10 (2015): 2057-2067.
- Walsh MJ., et al. “Surgical repair of the gluteal tendons: a report of 72 cases”. The Journal of Arthroplasty 26 (2011): 1514-1519.
- Okoroha KR., et al. “Defining minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state after isolated endoscopic gluteus medius repair”. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 47 (2019): 3141-3147.
- Davies JF., et al. “Surgical treatment of hip abductor tendon tears”. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 95 (2013): 1420-1425.
- Schlegel TF., et al. “Radiologic and clinical evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen implant to treat partial-thickness tears: a prospective multicenter study”. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 2 (2018): 242-251.
- Parodi D., et al. “Endoscopic gluteus medius partial tear repair with collagen patch augmentation. Clinical and imaging results”. International Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Journal 1 (2024): 26-32.
- Molly A Day., et al. “Repair of gluteus medius tears with bioinductive collagen patch augmentation: initial evaluation of safety and imaging”. Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery 3 (2022): 185-190.
- Chandrasekaran S., et al. “Outcomes of endoscopic gluteus medius repair: Study of thirty-four patients with minimum two-year follow-up”. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume16 (2015): 1340-1347.
- Davies H., et al. “Surgical repair of chronic tears of the hip abductor mechanism”. Hip International 4 (2019): 372-376.
- Domb BG., et al. “Outcomes of endoscopic gluteus medius repair with minimum 2-year follow-up”. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 5 (2013): 988-997.
- Voos JE., et al. “Endoscopic repair of gluteus medius tendon tears of the hip”. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 4 (2009): 743-747.
- Alpaugh K., et al. “Outcomes after primary open or endoscopic abductor tendon repair in the hip: A systematic review of the literature”. Arthroscopy3 (2020): 530-540.
- Kirby D., et al. “Clinical Outcomes after Endoscopic Repair of Gluteus Medius Tendon Tear Using a Knotless Technique With a 2-Year Minimum Follow-Up”. Arthroscopy 11 (2020): 2849-2855.
Citation
Copyright