Acta Scientific Orthopaedics (ISSN: 2581-8635)

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 10

Epidemiology, Indications and Results of Intermediate Hip Arthroplasty in Tropical Setting

Soumaro Kanaté Daouda1*, Aka Kouamé Evrard Vianney Medgar1, Mobiot Aka Christelle Désirée-Thérèse2, Coulibaly Amadou Marcellin1, Kouadio Samah David1, Coulibaly Nahoua Alassane1, Boka Eva Rebecca1, Zambi Doua Audric-Aimé1, Sess Rodolph Arthur Delorh3, Sy Abdel Kader1, Kacou Aka Désiiré1, Traoré Alidou2 and Sie Essoh Jean-Baptiste1

1Trauma, Orthopedics and Reconstructive Surgery Department of the Yopougon University Hospital Center, Côte d’Ivoire
2Orthopedics, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery Department of the Angré University Hospital Center, Côte d’Ivoire
3Orthopedic Trauma Department Saint Joseph Moscati Catholic Hospital Yamoussoukro, Côte d’Ivoire

*Corresponding Author: Habtewold Mulat, Assistant Professor, Orthopedic and trauma surgeon at St. Paul Millennium Medical Collage, Aabet Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Member of College of Surgeons in Central, East and South Africa.

Received: September 04, 2024; Published: September 20, 2024

Abstract

Introduction: Fractures of the femoral neck are common in the osteoporotic elderly following minor trauma. They are usually treated surgically. Arthroplasty treatment of femoral neck fractures is currently poorly codified. In sub-Saharan Africa, the use of intermediate hip arthroplasty is recent. The aim of this study was to analyse the epidemiological profile and indications for intermediate hip arthroplasty, and to assess the short and medium-term functional results.

Patients and Method: We conducted a retrospective study of 77 patients treated with intermediate hip Arthroplasty. The study was conducted over a period of seven (07) years. All patients hospitalized for a femoral neck fracture treated with an intermediate hip arthroplasty and with a minimum follow-up of 5 years were included. Pathological fractures were excluded. Epidemiological, diagnostic, therapeutic and evolutionary data were collected for each patient. Functional results were assessed using the Postel and Merle d'Aubigné method. Epi info7 was used to analyse the data.

Results: The average age was 57. The patients were 48 men and 29 women. Aetiologies were dominated by domestic and road traffic accidents. The average time between trauma and surgery was 73.48 days. The majority of patients had a pre-injury walking ability of 9 according to the Parker score. Pseudarthrosis of the neck was found in 41 patients (53.25%). The Moore posterolateral approach was used in all cases. The mean follow-up was 7.6 months. We noted 1 early dislocation, 4 loosening and 18 osteoarthritis of the acetabulum. The average functional results were very good in the short and medium term.

Conclusion: The average age was 57. Road traffic accidents accounted for 40.26% of aetiologies. The fractures were old lesions. Despite a high rate of osteoarthritis of the acetabulum, functional results were very good in the medium term.

Keywords: Epidemiology; Hemiarthroplasty; Intermediate Arthroplasty; Functional Result; Tropical Setting

References

  1. Delaveau A., et al. “Impact du délai opératoire dans la prise en charge des fractures de l’extrémité supérieure du fémur dans filière ortho-gériatrique”. Revue De Chirurgie Orthopédique Et Traumatologique5 (2019): 624-628.
  2. Simon , et al. “Les fractures du col du fémur après 50 ans”. Revue de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique 94.6 (2008): 108-132.
  3. Bhandari M., et “Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey”. The Journal of Bone Joint Surgery 87.9 (2005): 2122-2130.
  4. Schoumaker B., ‘‘Le vieillissement en Afrique subsaharienne”. Espace, Populations, Sociétés 3 (2000): 379-390.
  5. Forni , et al. “Mortality after hip fracture in the elderly: the role of a multidisciplinary approach and time to surgery in a retrospective observational study on 23,973 patients”. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 66 (2016): 13-17.
  6. Wang F., et al. “Comparison of bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures, in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis”. BioMed Central Musculoskeletal Disorders 16 (2015): 229-241.
  7. Traoré A., et al. “Traitement chirurgical conservateur des fractures du col fémoral : Analyse des indications et évaluation des résultats d’une série de 21 cas à Abidjan". Revue Internationale des Sciences médicales 9 (2007): 66-69.
  8. Merle d’Aubigne R. ‘’Cotation chiffrée de la fonction de la hanche”. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Réparation de l’Appareil Locomoteur 56 (1997): 481-486.
  9. Bertault J., et al. “Comparative study of total hip arthroplasties with dual mobility cups versus hemiarthroplasties in management of femoral neck fractures: Survival and dislocation rate at 5 years of follow-up?” Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research 108 (2022): 103098.
  10. Haubruck P., et al. “Femoral neck fractures: current evidence, controversies and arising challenges”. Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery Research6 (2020): 597-600.
  11. Gao H., et al. “Which is the best alternative for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly?: A meta-analysis”. Clinical Orthopaedics Related Research6 (2012): 1782-1791.
  12. Kierszbaum E., et al. “Anterior approach without traction table: a means of saving time and money in hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture? A case-matched study with and without traction table”. Orthopeadics and Traumatology Surgery Research3 (2020): 583-588.
  13. Emery R., et al. “Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for subcapital fracture of the femoral neck. A prospective randomised trial of cemented Thompson and uncemented Moore stems”. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery british 73 (1991); 322-324.
  14. Choy W, et al. “Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients”. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2.4 (2010): 221-226.
  15. Lortat-Jacob , et al. “Infection postopératoire des fractures de l'extrémité supérieure du fémur”. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Réparatrice de l’Appareil Moteur 73,3 (1987): 179-187.
  16. Nkilly ED., et al. “Intermediate Hip Arthroplasty in Gabon: Blood Loss and Risk Factor for Transfusion”. Open Journal of Anesthesiology 14 (2024): 109-117.
  17. Amouri SH., et al. "Influence du délai chirurgical sur la mortalité à un an des fractures du col fémoral du sujet âgé”. Al Hakim Revue Médicale Algérienne 39 (2022): 64-68.
  18. Yao LB., et al. “Mortalité en Orthopédie-Traumatologie : aspects épidémiologiques et facteurs de risques”. Revue Internationale des Sciences Médicales d’Abidjan1 (2021); 55-62.
  19. Aubrun F., et al. “Recommandations sur l’anesthésie du sujet âgé : l’exemple de la fracture de l’extrémité supérieure du fémur”. Anesthésie et Réanimation 2 (2019): 122-138.
  20. Rahme E. “Short-term mortality associated with failure to receive home care after hemiarthroplasty”. Canadien Medical Association journal13 (2010): 1421-1426.
  21. Lallier T. « La chirurgie de la prothèse de hanche”. Un rapport du régime d’assurance maladie des professions indépendantes » 12 (2002): 40-69.
  22. Merlo L., et al. “La prothèse intermédiaire dans les fractures du col du Résultats et tolérance cotyloïdienne à long terme de 36 arthroplasties intermédiaires”. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et traumatologique 78.8 (1992) : 536-543.
  23. Hopley , et al. “Primary total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in older patients: systematic review”. British Medical Journal 11 (2010): 340-c2332.
  24. Zi-Sheng , et al. “Hemiarthroplasty vs primary total hip arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck in the elderly: a meta-analysis”. Journal of Arthroplasty 27.4 (2012); 583-590.
  25. Burgers , et al. “Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized trials”. International Orthopeadics 36.8 (2012): 1549-1560.
  26. Svenøy , et al. “Posterior versus lateral approach for hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture: early complications in a prospective cohort of 583 patients”. Injury 48.7 (2017): 1565-1569.
  27. Sharma , et al. “Outcome analysis of hemiarthroplasty vs. total hip replacement in displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly”. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 10.5 (2016): 11-13
  28. Liodakis E., et al. “Major complications and transfusion rates after hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures”. The Journal of Arthroplasty9 (2016): 2008-2012.
  29. Boukebous B., et al. “Pronostic des arthroplasties totales à double mobilité et intermédiaires dans les fractures du col du fémur, à propos d’une série rétrospective de 199 prothèses”. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique 3 (2018): 259-265.
  30. , et al. “Direct anterior Hueter approach is a safe and effective approach to perform a bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: outcome in 82 patients”. Acta Orthopeadica 86.3 (2015): 358-362.
  31. Hardinge K. “The direct lateral approach to the hip”. The Journal of Bone Joint Surgery British 1 (1982): 17-19.
  32. Charnley J and Ferrera A. “Transplantation of the greater trochanter in arthroplasty of the hip”. The Journal of Bone Joint Surgery British 46 (1964): 191-197.
  33. Llizaliturri “Small incision total hip replacement by the lateral approach using standard instruments”. Orthopaedics 27.4 (2004): 377-381.
  34. Chiron PH. "Etude prospective et comparative entre la voie d’abord postérieure minimale invasive et la voie postérieure standard dans les prothèses totales de hanche”. e-mémoires de l’Académie Nationale de Chirurgie3 ( 2006): 06-16.
  35. Laffosse M., et al. “Prospective and comparative study of minimally invasive posterior approach versus standard posterior approach in total hip remplacement?” Revue de chirurgie orthopédique et réparatrice de l'appareil moteur 3 (2007): 228-237.
  36. Delambre J. “Quel abord dans la prothèse intermédiaire de hanche pour fracture du col du fémur?". Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique S7 (2013): S277.
  37. Selmi T., et al. “Morbidité et fiabilité de la mise en place d’une prothèse totale de hanche par voie d’abord postérieure réduite". Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique8 (2007): 752-759.
  38. Guyen O. “Hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty in recent femoral neck fractures?’’ Orthopeadics and Traumatology, Surgery and Research 1S (2019): S95-S101.
  39. Kim YT., et al. “Dual mobility hip arthroplasty provides better outcomes compared to hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a retrospective comparative clinical study”. International Orthopeadics6 (2018): 1241-1246.

Citation

Citation: Soumaro Kanaté Daouda., et al. “Epidemiology, Indications and Results of Intermediate Hip Arthroplasty in Tropical Setting".Acta Scientific Orthopaedics 7.10 (2024): 27-32.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Soumaro Kanaté Daouda., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In



News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is October 25, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US