Alireza Kazemi B*, Daniel Bueno C, Marcos Mínguez H, Carlos Tercero M and Daniel Herrador RA

Institution of Physiotheraphy and Sport S.L, Spain

*Corresponding Author: Alireza Kazemi B, Institution of Physiotheraphy and Sport S.L, Spain.

Received: March 20, 2023; Published: July 12, 2023

Abstract

An inventive philosophy based on logic and scientific evidence becomes a fait accompli called a thesis in scientific advancement at the service of the population.
This study aims to demonstrate the benefits that an instrument invented from a globalizing thought can bring about the existence of the human body as a sum of living tissues formed by basic materials. The human body is composed of molecules that from chemistry to organic chemistry generated biological tissues that have geometry, which in turn have their architecture, which obey the physical laws of charge, which compose among themselves a mechanical congruence at the service of kinetic functions, consuming processed energy from food in the digestive system made available to machinery controlled by a spectacular neural electronic system and endocrinological. A perfect symbiosis that requires care of the health sciences and kinetic activity for its perfect conservation. For this reason, the invented instrument object of the study has been based on facilitating a programmed, protocolized and caudalized physical activity that promotes the joint work of different apparatuses, systems and segments of the body in an integral conceptorat the service of the concrete objectives for health without losing the overall contribution of the body to the cause.
In this case, the instrument invented in its initial conception sought to harmonize the function of the load and mobility of the vertebral structures, which had suffered geometric deterioration of the segments that make up the spine, causing pain, but along the way we were surprised by other benefits that we have achieved from a global contribution of the body.
The instrument was able to improve lumbar ailments from global physical exercise with special attention to the importance of load lines [21] in favor of the conservation of the segments, their appropriate biomechanics, necessary contribution of the body's system to the service of the main objective that was low back pain, due to the structural damage suffered that could probably result in an inappropriate joint mechanics that with the passage of time would contribute to the degenerative process of the body structures that make up the different systems.

Keywords:Global; Physical Exercise; Prototype; Low Back Pain

References

1. Manuel Fernández Prada., et al. “Guidelines for action and monitoring of low back pain (SBP)”. Foundation for Training and IMC Madrid (2015).
2. M Sauné Castillo., et al. “Epidemiological study of low back pain. Analysis of predictive factors of disability”. Rehabilitation1(2003): 3-10.
3. Ursula Ocaña Jiménez. “Occupational low back pain and occupational work disability. Low back pain and disability at work”. Journal of Physiotherapy2 (2007):17-26.
4. Alcántara-Bumbiedro S., et al. “Disability scale for low back pain of Oswestry Rehabilitation (Madrid)” 40.3(2006):150-158.
5. Philippe Campignion. Breaths. The muscle and joint chains G.D.S. Lencina-Verdú Independent Editors (1999).
6. A Lapierre. “Physical re-education. Volume II Kinesiology 6^th Edition treatment 304, 305, 71. CIE, S.L.- DOSSAR (2000).
7. Jorge Rodrigo Vásquez-Ríos and Tania Inés Nava-Bringas. “Lumbar stabilization exercises”. Surgery and Surgeons3 (2014).
8. Jennifer Pohlmen. “Step by step Pilates program”. Editorial Tutor, S.A (2005): 54-55. Madrid.
9. Delorme TL and Watson AL. “Progressive Resistance Exercise. Appelton-Century, Nueva York (1951).
10. M Küster. “Three-dimensional ultrasound topometry of the spine and maximum force measurement of the trunk muscles in adolescents”. 3-D-ultrasound topometry of the spine and assessment of the maximum trunk muscle strength in adolescents. Chair of Kinesiology and Training, Technical University of Munich”. DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR SPORTMEDIZIN 12 (2003).
11. Julie A Hides., et al. “Small Multifidus Muscle Size Predicts Football Injuries”. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 6 (2014).
12. FH Willard., et al. “The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations”. Journal of Anatomy 6 (2012): 507-536.
13. MD Schuenke., et al. “A description of the lumbar interfascial triangle and its relation with the lateral raphe: anatomical constituents of load transfer through the lateral margin of the thoracolumbar fascia”. Journal of Anatomy6 (2012): 568-576.
14. Williams A., et al. “A randomised controlled trial of a lifestyle behavioural intervention for patients with low back pain, who are overweight or obese: study protocol”. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 17 (2016):70.
15. Ye C., et al. “Comparison of lumbar spine stabilization exercise versus general exercise in young male patients with lumbar disc herniation after 1 year of follow-up”. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine 6 (2015):9869-9875.
16. Steele J., et al. “A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Isolated Lumbar Extension Exercise on Lumbar Kinematic Pattern Variability During Gait in Chronic Low Back Pain”. PM and R2 (2016):105-114.
17. Garima Anandani., et al. “Effectiveness of device-based therapy for conservative management of low back pain”. T 2140 her. Sci 27.7 (2015).
18. Anna Selby-Alan Herman. “Mold the body with Pilates method”. Integral Editorial (2005). Barcelona.
19. Liddle SA., et al. “Exercise and chonic low back pain: What works?” Pain 107 (2004): 176-190.
20. Pérez Guisado J. “Low back pain and physical exercise”. International Journal of Medicine and Sciences of Physical Activity and Sport 24 230-247.
21. Alireza Kazemi B. “How to Deal with Agents: Medical and Ethical Aspects”. Acta Scientific Orthopaedics 1 (2023): 06-16.
22. Kazemi AR. “Influence of closed kinetic system on global myofascial improvement and low back pain. The VIII congress of the world federation of athletic training and therapy”. Madrid: Athletic Training and Therapy (2017): 75.
23. Recio-García JAAA. “Intelligent control system for back pain therapy”. Case-based reasoning research and development. 25^th international conference, ICCBR 2017. Trondheim. Norway (2017): 287-301.
24. Recio-Garcia JA., et al. “Intelligent control system for back pain therapy”. In International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. Springer, Cham (2017): 287-301.
25. Juan A Recio-García BDA. “A data-driven predictive system using Case-Based Reasoning for the configuration of deviceassisted back pain therapy”. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 420 (2019).
26. Alireza Kazemi. “He is the inventor and principal investigator of the paper”. Institute of Physiotherapy and Sport. Guadalajara-Spain.

Citation

Citation: Alireza Kazemi B., et al. “Influence of l Global Physical Exercise on a Prototype on Low Back Pain (Patent Es2457990 B1)”.Acta Scientific Orthopaedics 6.8 (2023): 68-80.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Alireza Kazemi B., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.