Acta Scientific Orthopaedics (ISSN: 2581-8635)

E-Book Volume 6 Issue 7

Outcome of Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction by Hamstring Tendon and Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft

Shorif Uz Zaman1*, Muhammad Amzad Hussain2, Mohammad Shah Kamal Uddin3, GM Jahangir Hossain4, Ushahla Marma5, Mohammad Badsha Miah6 and Naima Akter7

1Junior Consultant of Orthopaedic Surgery, 250 Bed General Hospital, Gopalganj, Bangladesh
2Medical Officer of Orthopaedic Surgery, 250 Bed District Sadar Hospital, Cox'sbazar, Bangladesh
3Junior Consultant of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cox's Bazar Sadar Hospital, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh
4Associate Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation, Dhaka, Bangladesh
5Assistant Registrar of Orthopaedic Surgery, 250 Bed District Sadar Hospital, Cox'sbazar, Bangladesh
6Assistant Professor, Orthopaedic Surgery, Sheikh Sayera Khatun Medical College Gopalganj, Bangladesh
7Assistant Registrar, Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh

*Corresponding Author: Shorif Uz Zaman, Junior Consultant of Orthopaedic Surgery, 250 bed general Hospital, Gopalganj, Bangladesh.

Received: June 13, 2023; Published: June 14, 2023

Abstract

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most common ligament to be torn in the knee joint and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is one of the most commonly performed surgery in orthopaedics nowadays.

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and functional outcome along with donor site morbidity of ACL reconstruction using Hamstring tendon and Peroneus longus tendon autograft.

Methods: This prospective observational study was carried out at National Institute of Traumatology and Orthoapedic Rehabilitation, Dhaka from January 2019 to December 2020. A total case of 30 in group 1 (Hamstring tendon) and 30 in group 2 (Peroneus longus tendon) is included in the study according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results: Preoperative Lysholm knee score was 63.33 in group 1 and 62.43 in group 2. An improvement was observed in post-operative Lysholm knee score in both groups (93.67 vs 95.53). Post-operatively anterior drawer and Lachman test was positive in one case in group 1 due to graft failure. Superficial infection was seen in one case in group-1 and two cases in group-2, knee pain was present 6.67% cases in group 1 whereas no pain was reported in group 2. No significant difference was observed regarding graft diameter between two groups (8.02 mm vs 8.3 mm). Overall, most of the cases showed excellent outcome in both groups (76.67% vs 83.33%). Post-operative AOFAS score was excellent in all the case of peroneus longus group.

Conclusion: Although complication rate is lower and excellent outcome is more in group 2, it was not statistically significant. Peroneus longus graft from the ankle did not produce any poor outcome and both hamstring and peroneus longus can be used safely in ACL reconstruction.

 Keywords: Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL); Knee Joint; ACL Reconstruction (ACLR)

References

  1. Sudevan P J., et al. “Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using patellar bone tendon autograft and Rigidfix fixation-A midterm functional outcome”. Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal2 (2017): 247-251.
  2. Kim HS., et al. “Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction”. Knee Surgery and Related Research4 (2013): 165-172.
  3. Purboyo D., et al. “Functional Outcome In ACL Reconstruction Using Autograft Hamstring Tendon And Peroneus Longus Tendon : A Meta Analysis”. Indian Journal of Science and Research 8 (2019): 1813-1817.
  4. Daniel DM., et al. “Fate Of The ACL-Injured Patient. A Prospective Outcome Study”. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 22 (1994): 632-644.
  5. Carmichael JR and Cross MJ. “Why Bone-Patella Tendon-Bone Grafts Should Still Be Considered The Gold Standard For Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction”. British Journal of Sports Medicine 43 (2009): 323-325.
  6. Chodavarapu LM., et al. “Analysis Of Functional Outcome Of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadruple Hamstring Graft”. Indian Journal of Medical Research 3 (2017): 877-882.
  7. Rhatomy S., et al. “Single bundle ACL reconstruction with peroneus longus tendon graft: 2-years follow-up”. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma 11 (2020): S332-S336.
  8. Steiner M. “Editorial Commentary: Size Does Matter—Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Diameter Affects Biomechanical And Clinical Outcomes, Arthroscopy”. Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 33 (2017): 1014-1015.
  9. Eckenrode BJ., et al. “Prevention and management of post-operative complications following ACL reconstruction”. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine3 (2017): 315-321.
  10. Gobbi A., et al. “Postoperative infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction”. Sports Health2 (2016): 187-189.
  11. Pinczewski LA., et al. “Integration Of Hamstring Tendon Graft With Bone In Reconstruction Of The Anterior Cruciate Ligament”. Arthroscopy 13 (1997): 641-643.
  12. Kerimoğlu S., et al. “Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the peroneus longus tendon”. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica1 (2008): 38.
  13. Angthong C., et al. “The anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the peroneus longus tendon: a biomechanical and clinical evaluation of the donor ankle morbidity”. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand6 (2015): 555-560.
  14. Zhao J and Huangfu X. “The Biomechanical And Clinical Application Of Using The Anterior Half Of The Peroneus Longus Tendon As An Autograft Source”. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 40 (2012): 662-671.

Citation

Citation: Shorif Uz Zaman., et al. “Outcome of Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction by Hamstring Tendon and Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft".Acta Scientific Orthopaedics 6.7 (2023): 28-33.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Shorif Uz Zaman., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In



News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is June 25, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US