Acta Scientific Orthopaedics (ISSN: 2581-8635)

Clinical Case Reports Volume 6 Issue 7

Unconstrained Cervical Total Disc Replacement not One Design Suits Every Patient. Case Report

Juan Manuel Amaya Sánchez1*, John Choi1 and Hong Lee Terry Teo2

1Spine Ortho Clinic, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore

*Corresponding Author: AJuan Manuel Amaya Sánchez, Spine Ortho Clinic, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Received: April 20, 2023; Published: June 10, 2023

Abstract

Degenerative disc disease is one of the main causes of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. It has been treated traditionally with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) [1]. However, this procedure was not immune from different types of complications, one of the most frequent is adjacent segment disease (ASD). As a result, new techniques such as total disc replacement (TDR) have emerged as an alternative to preserve motion and decrease the risk of ASD [2].

Keywords:Cervical Disc Replacement; Metallosis; Mobi C; Cervical Radiculopathy

References

  1. Findlay C., et al. “Total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review with meta-analysis of data from a total of 3160 patients across 14 randomized controlled trials with both short- and medium- to long-term outcomes”. The Bone and Joint Journal 100-B.8 (2018): 991-1001.
  2. Leven D., et al. “Cervical disc replacement surgery: indications, technique, and technical pearls”. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine2 (2017): 160-169.
  3. Lazennec J Y. “Lumbar and cervical viscoelastic disc replacement: Concepts and current experience”. World Journal of Orthopedics8 (2020): 345-356.
  4. Durbhakula M M and Ghiselli G. “Cervical total disc replacement, part I: rationale, biomechanics, and implant types”. The Orthopedic Clinics of North America3 (2005): 349-354.
  5. Epstein NE and Agulnick MA. "Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA)/total disc replacement (TDR) vs. anterior cervical diskectomy/fusion (ACDF): A review”. Surgical Neurology International 13 (2022): 565.
  6. Onken J., et al. “Revision surgery for cervical artificial disc: Surgical technique and clinical results”. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 152 (2017): 39-44.
  7. Di Martino A., et al. “Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?”. European Spine Journal : Official Publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 24 (2015): 810-825.
  8. Bertagnoli R., et al. “Cervical total disc replacement, part two: clinical results”. The Orthopedic clinics of North America 3 (2005): 355-362.
  9. Guyer R D., et al. “Early failure of metal-on-metal artificial disc prostheses associated with lymphocytic reaction: diagnosis and treatment experience in four cases”. Spine7 (2011): E492-E497.
  10. Goel V K., et al. “Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement”. European Spine Journal : Official Publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society5 (2012): S688-S699.
  11. Jacobs C A M., et al. “Viscoelastic cervical total disc replacement devices: Design concepts”. The Spine Journal : Official Journal of the North American Spine Society 12 (2020): 1911-1924.
  12. Shin J J., et al. “Cervical disc arthroplasty: What we know in 2020 and a literature review”. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong Kong) 29 (2021): 23094990211006934.
  13. Patwardhan A G and Havey RM. “Biomechanics of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty-A Review of Concepts and Current Technology”. International Journal of Spine Surgerys2 (2020): S14-S28.
  14. Wang X., et al. “Cervical sagittal alignment after Prestige LP cervical disc replacement: radiological results and clinical impacts from a single-center experience”. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorder 22 (2021): 82.
  15. Niu T., et al. “Cervical artificial disc extrusion after a paragliding accident”. Surgical Neurology International 8 (2017): 138.
  16. Tumialán LM., et al. “Arthroplasty in the military: a preliminary experience with ProDisc-C and ProDisc-L”. Neurosurgical Focus5 (2010): E18.

Citation

Citation: Juan Manuel Amaya Sánchez., et al. “Unconstrained Cervical Total Disc Replacement not One Design Suits Every Patient. Case Report”.Acta Scientific Orthopaedics 6.7 (2023): 11-16.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Juan Manuel Amaya Sánchez., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In



News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is May 30, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US