Acta Scientific Orthopaedics (ISSN: 2581-8635)

Case Report Volume 6 Issue 4

Osteoid Osteoma in the Proximal Humerus in a 52-Year-Old - A Case Report

Velitsikakis P A1, Oikonomopoulos L1, Perisynakis N1, Staikos N2, Giovanidis G1

1Orthopaedic Department, General Hospital of Chalkida, Chalkida, Greece
2Emergency Department, General Hospital of Chalkida, Chalkida, Greece

*Corresponding Author: Velitsikakis Paraskevas-Asimakis (Orthopaedic Department, General Hospital of Chalkida, Chalkida, Greece) ,Address: Korytsas 57, Chalkida, Greece.

Received: February 23, 2023; Published: March 18, 2023

Reprints View PDF Related Articles

Abstract

Introduction: The skeleton is the most common target of metastatic disease, after lungs and liver. Humerus is the third most common location for a bone metastasis. Pathologic fractures occur as a response to the compromised physiology of the bones, which has as a result poor mechanical properties due to the underlying lesion.

Methods and Materials: A 59year-old woman with diagnosed and under treatment lung cancer arrived at the outpatient orthopaedic clinic due to chronic pain (three weeks) and inability to lift her right arm. The onset of pain was gradual. Radiological tests showed a fracture in the proximal third of the humerus and a lytic lesion.

Results: The patient was treated with internal fixation with a locking plate, broad abrasion and ablation of the lytic lesion and cement infusion. The patient was mobilized without limitations, other than avoidance of loading, post-operatively.

Conclusion: Pathological fractures are a common complication of bone metastases. Life expectancy in patients with bone metastases has been extended due to the progress in chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and other oncological therapies. At pathological fractures of the humeral shaft, the abrasion of the lytic lesion and the infusion of cement, after internal fixation, creates a more stable fixation of the fracture and gives the patient a better quality of life being able to use the arm. According to current bibliography, the use of PMMA limits the spread of cancer cells.

Keywords: Pathologic Fracture, Internal Fixation, Cement Infusion

References

  1. American Cancer. "Cancer facts and figures 2017” (2013).
  2. Jayarangaiah Apoorva., et al. “Bone Metastasis”. StatPearls (2022).
  3. Rizzo Sarah E and Shachar Kenan. “Pathologic Fractures”. StatPearls (2022).
  4. Toma CD., et al. “Metastatic bone disease: a 36-year single centre trend-analysis of patients admitted to a tertiary orthopaedic surgical department”. Journal of Surgical Oncology5 (2007): 404-1410.
  5. Wedin R and HCF Bauer. “Surgical treatment of skeletal metastatic lesions of the proximal femur: endoprosthesis or reconstruction nail?”. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume12 (2005): 1653-1657.
  6. Janssen Stein J., et al. “Complications After Surgical Management of Proximal Femoral Metastasis: A Retrospective Study of 417 Patients”. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons7 (2016): 483-494.
  7. Biermann J Sybil., et al. “Metastatic bone disease: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment”. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume6 (2009): 1518-1530.
  8. Papagelopoulos Panayiotis J., et al. “Advances and challenges in diagnosis and management of skeletal metastases”. Orthopedics7 (2006): 609-622.
  9. Coleman RE. “Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies”. Cancer Treatment Reviews 27.3 (2001): 165-176.
  10. Hage WD., et al. “Incidence, location, and diagnostic evaluation of metastatic bone disease”. The Orthopedic Clinics of North America4 (2000): 515-228.
  11. Casadei R., et al. “Humeral metastasis of renal cancer: Surgical options and review of literature”. Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Surgery and Research: OTSR4 (2018): 533-538.
  12. Murray JA and FF Parrish. “Surgical management of secondary neoplastic fractures about the hip”. The Orthopedic Clinics of North America 5.4 (1974): 887-90
  13. Quinn Robert H., et al. “Contemporary management of metastatic bone disease: tips and tools of the trade for general practitioners”. Instructional Course Lectures 63 (2014): 431-441.
  14. Ratasvuori Maire., et al. “Prognostic role of en-bloc resection and late onset of bone metastasis in patients with bone-seeking carcinomas of the kidney, breast, lung, and prostate: SSG study on 672 operated skeletal metastases”. Journal of Surgical Oncology4 (2014): 360-365.
  15. Errani Costantino., et al. “Treatment for long bone metastases based on a systematic literature review”. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology: Orthopedie Traumatologie2 (2017): 205-211.
  16. Yu Xiuchun., et al. “Clinical outcomes of giant cell tumor of bone treated with bone cement filling and internal fixation, and oral bisphosphonates”. Oncology Letters2 (2013): 447-451.
  17. Choi Eun-Seok., et al. “Intramedullary Nailing for Pathological Fractures of the Proximal Humerus”. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery4 (2016): 458-464.
  18. Hunt Kenneth J., et al. “Surgical fixation of pathologic fractures: an evaluation of evolving treatment methods”. Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.))3-4 (2006): 77-82.
  19. Jacofsky David J and George J Haidukewych. “Management of pathologic fractures of the proximal femur: state of the art”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 18.7 (2004): 459-469.
  20. Narazaki Douglas Kenji., et al. “Prognostic factors in pathologic fractures secondary to metastatic tumors”. Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)4 (2006): 313-320.
  21. Ruggieri Pietro., et al. “Protocol of surgical treatment of long bone pathological fractures”. Injury11 (2010): 1161-1167.
  22. Angelini Andrea., et al. “Treatment of pathologic fractures of the proximal femur”. Injury3 (2018): S77-S83.
  23. Cappellari Alessandro., et al. “New concepts in the surgical treatment of actual and impending pathological fractures in metastatic disease”. Injury S0020-1383 (2020): 30952-30959.
  24. Pala Elisa., et al. “Intramedullary nailing for impending or pathologic fracture of the long bone: titanium vs carbon fiber peek nailing”. EFORT Open Reviews8 (2022): 611-617.
  25. Dijkstra S., et al. “Treatment of pathological fractures of the humeral shaft due to bone metastases: a comparison of intramedullary locking nail and plate osteosynthesis with adjunctive bone cement”. European Journal of Surgical Oncology: The Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology6 (1996): 621-626.
  26. Ricard Marc-Antoine M., et al. “Intramedullary Nailing Versus Plate Osteosynthesis for Humeral Shaft Metastatic Lesions”. Cureus3 (2021): e13788.
  27. Choi Eun-Seok., et al. “Intramedullary Nailing for Pathological Fractures of the Proximal Humerus”. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery4 (2016): 458-464.
  28. Moura Diogo Lino., et al. “Treatment of Pathological Humerus-Shaft Tumoral Fractures with Rigid Static Interlocking Intramedullary Nail-22 Years of Experience”. Revista Brasileira De Ortopedia2 (2019): 149-155.
  29. Moon Bryan S., et al. “Is It Appropriate to Treat Sarcoma Metastases with Intramedullary Nailing?” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research1 (2017): 212-217.
  30. Krygier Jeffrey E., et al. “Operative management of metastatic melanoma in bone may require en bloc resection of disease”. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research10 (2014): 3196-3203.
  31. Frassica FJ., et al. “Special problems in limb-salvage surgery”. Seminars in Surgical Oncology1 (1997): 55-63.
  32. Althausen P., et al. “Prognostic factors and surgical treatment of osseous metastases secondary to renal cell carcinoma”. Cancer6 (1997): 1103-1109.
  33. Bocchi L., et al. “The surgical treatment of metastases in long bones”. Italian Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2 (1988): 167-173.
  34. Buggay David and Kenneth Jaffe. “Metastatic bone tumors of the pelvis and lower extremity”. Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 12.4 (2003): 192-199.
  35. Rath B., et al. “Differenzierte Therapiestrategien bei Knochenmetastasen der Extremitäten” [Differentiated treatment strategies for bone metastases of the extremities]”. Der Orthopade9 (2019): 752-759.
  36. Koob Sebastian., et al. “Intramedullary Nailing Versus Compound Plate Osteosynthesis in Pathologic Diaphyseal Humerus Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study”. American Journal of Clinical Oncology9 (2022): 379-380.
  37. Rovere G., et al. “Proximal humerus fractures treatment in adult patients with bone metastasis”. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences1 (2022): 100-105.
  38. Pretell Juan., et al. “Treatment of pathological humeral shaft fractures with intramedullary nailing. A retrospective study”. International Orthopaedics4 (2010): 559-563.
  39. Dijkstra S., et al. “Treatment of pathological fractures of the humeral shaft due to bone metastases: a comparison of intramedullary locking nail and plate osteosynthesis with adjunctive bone cement”. European Journal of Surgical Oncology: The Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology6 (1996): 621-626.
  40. Sarahrudi Kambiz., et al. “Surgical treatment of pathological fractures of the shaft of the humerus”. The Journal of Trauma3 (2009): 789-794.
  41. Laitinen Minna., et al. “Treatment of pathological humerus shaft fractures with intramedullary nails with or without cement fixation”. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery4 (2011): 503-508.
  42. Gebhart M., et al. “Metastatic involvement of the humerus: a retrospective study of 51 cases”. Acta orthopaedica Belgica5 (2001): 456-463.

Citation

Citation: Velitsikakis P A., et al. “Treatment of Pathologic Fracture of Humerus with Internal Fixation, Abrasion of The Lytic Lesion and Cement Infusion; A Case Report and Literature Review”. Acta Scientific Orthopaedics 6.4 (2023): 57-63.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Velitsikakis P A., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In



News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is July 30, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US





Creative Commons License Open Access by Acta Scientific is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Based on a work at https://actascientific.com

ff

Acta-Publications

ff

© 2021 Acta Scientific, All rights reserved.