Rajvinder S*, Lopez J Mohan and G Ruslan Nazaruddin Simanjuntak

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, KPJ Tawakkal KL Specialist Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

*Corresponding Author: Rajvinder S, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, KPJ Tawakkal KL Specialist Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Received: October 20, 2022; Published: November 13, 2022

Abstract

Total Hip Replacement (THR) is a restorative procedure aimed at managing hip-joint ailments that display little to no response to conventional medical therapy. The procedure has improved patients’ quality of life and overall survival. After conducting a comprehensive review of a case of a fortuitous left hip replacement procedure conducted on a senior 93-year-old male patient whose ability to hike was impaired by bilateral hip joint osteoarthritis, the success factors of this procedure were determined. After enduring a surgical excision of the femur’s head and proximal neck, his walking ability was restored. There were no physical activity-related complications. A comprehensive cross-sectional study showed that good surgical excision, effective cementing techniques, proper placement of implants, the young patient age at the time of THR, and the underlying cause for the surgery were the elements attributed to the procedure’s success.

Keywords:Total Hip Replacement, Osteoarthritis, Cementing Technique

References

1. National Joint Registry. “National Joint Registry for England”. Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: 15^th annual report (2018).
2. Glyn-Jones S., et al. “Osteoarthritis”. Lancet London England9991 (2015): 376-387.
3. Kumar N., et al. “Bearing surfaces in hip replacement - Evolution and likely future”. Medical Journal Armed Forces India 4 (2014): 371-376.
4. Laigaard J., et al. “Minimal clinically important differences in randomised clinical trials on pain management after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review”. British Journal of Anaesthesia5 (2021): 1029-1037.
5. Schwartsmann CR., et al. “Correlation between patient age at total hip replacement surgery and lifeexpectancy”. Acta Ortopedica Brasileira 23 (2015): 323-325.
6. Bayliss LE., et al. “The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study”. Lancet London England10077 (2017): 1424-1430.
7. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. “The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: annual report” (2016).
8. Gogineni HC., et al. “Transition to outpatient total hip and knee arthroplasty: experience at an academic tertiary care center”. Arthroplasty Today1 (2019): 100-105.
9. Darmanis SN., et al. “Benefits of using modern cementing techniques in the acetabulum: the Rim Cutter”. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Hong Kong3 (2012): 316-321.
10. Hu D., et al. “Comparison of ceramic-on-ceramic to metal-on-polyethylene bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials”. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 1 (2015): 22.
11. Mohaddes M., et al. “Implant survival and patient-reported outcome following total hip arthroplasty in patients 30 years or younger: a matched cohort study of 1,008 patients in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register”. Acta Orthopaedica3 (2019): 249-252.
12. Vissers MM., et al. “Psychological factors affecting the outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review”. In Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism 4 (2012): 576-588.
13. Mota RE., et al. “Determinants of demand for total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review”. BMC Health Services Research1 (2012): 1-8.
14. Gademan MG., et al. “Indication criteria for total hip or knee arthroplasty in Osteoarthritis: a state-of-the-science overview”. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1 (2016): 1-1.
15. Hamilton D., et al. “Comparative outcomes of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study”. Postgraduate Medical Journal1045 (2020): 627-631.
16. Duchman KR., et al. “The effect of smoking on short-term complications following total hip and knee arthroplasty”. JBJS13 (2015): 1049-1058.
17. Vehmeijer SB., et al. “Outpatient total hip and knee arthroplasty: facts and challenges”. Acta Orthopaedica2 (2018): 141-144.
18. Khanasuk Y., et al. “Does the intramedullary femoral canal plug reduce blood loss during total knee arthroplasty?” Knee Surgery and Related Research1 (2022): 1-7.
19. Canovas F and Dagneaux L. “Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty”. Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research1 (2018): S41-46.
20. Silva RR., et al. “Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty: systematic review”. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia 49 (2017): 520-527.
21. Krueger CA., et al. “Substantial preoperative work is unaccounted for in total hip and knee arthroplasty”. The Journal of Arthroplasty 9 (2020): 2318.
22. Morrell AT., et al. “Enhanced recovery after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review”. JBJS (2021): 10-2106.
23. Koh IJ., et al. “How does preoperative central sensitization affect quality of life following total knee arthroplasty?” The Journal of Arthroplasty8 (2020): 2044-2049.

Citation

Citation: Rajvinder S., et al. “The Quality of Life After a Total Hip Replacement Procedure: The Factors Attributed to a 24-Year Survival Case”. Acta Scientific Orthopaedics 5.12 (2022): 153-156.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Rajvinder S., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.