Acta Scientific Orthopaedics (ISSN: 2581-8635)

Review Article Volume 5 Issue 9

Simulation Fidelity in the Context of Surgical Training in Orthopaedics

Suddhajit Sen*

Consultant Orthopaedic Hand Surgeon, Raigmore Hospital, Honorary Senior Lecturer Edge Hill University, UK

*Corresponding Author: Suddhajit Sen, Consultant Orthopaedic Hand Surgeon, Raigmore Hospital, Honorary Senior Lecturer Edge Hill University, UK.

Received: July 21, 2022; Published: August 30, 2022


Surgical training has evolved in the last two decades from the traditional master apprentice model to a method of deliberate practice through simulation based learning. Simulation based learning is an established form of training in the aviation industry. Efficient and effective transfer of clinical skills through training is the final goal of all training methods. This article aims to critically review and analyse the relationship between simulation fidelity and surgical skills transfer in Orthopaedics to present a pragmatic perspective.


Keywords: Surgical Training; Orthopaedics; Simulation-Based Learning (SBL)


  1. Ziv A., et al. “Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative”. Simulation in Healthcare 4 (2006): 252-256.
  2. Ericsson KA. “The Influence of Experience and Deliberate Practice on the Development of Superior Expert Performance”. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance”. Cambridge University Press (2012): 683-704.
  3. Weller JM., et al. “Simulation in clinical teaching and learning”. The Medical Journal of Australia 9 (2012): 1-5.
  4. Stirling ERB., et al. “Surgical skills simulation in trauma and orthopaedic training”. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 9 (2014): 126.
  5. Norman G., et al. “The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning”. Medical Education 7 (2012): 636-647.
  6. Hall JC., et al. “Surgeons and cognitive processes”. British Journal of Surgery 90 (2003): 10-16.
  7. Allen J., et al. “The Relationship of Simulator Fidelity to Task and Performance Variable (2006).
  8. Hamstra SJ., et al. “Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training”. Academic Medicine 3 (2014): 387-392.
  9. Cook DA., et al. “Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis”. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association 806 (2011): 978-988.
  10. Brydges R., et al. “Coordinating progressive levels of simulation fidelity to maximize educational benefit”. Academic Medicine 5 (2010): 806-812.
  11. Leong JJH., et al. “Validation of orthopaedic bench models for trauma surgery”. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B 7 (2008): 958-965.
  12. McDougall EM. “Validation of surgical simulators”. Journal of Endourology. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2 Madison Avenue Larchmont, NY 10538 USA 21 (2007): 244-247.
  13. Malic C., et al. “A simple model for hand trauma training”. Journal of Hand Surgery European 5 (2007): 578-580.
  14. Howells NR., et al. “Transferring simulated arthroscopic skills to the operating theatre: A randomised blinded study”. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B 4 (2008): 494-499.
  15. Kahol K., et al. “Cognitive simulators for medical education and training”. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 4 (2009): 593-604.
  16. Paro JAM., et al. “Validation of a cognitive task simulation and rehearsal tool for open carpal tunnel release”. Archives of Plastic Surgery 3 (2017): 223-237.
  17. Casali G., et al. “The rise of human factors: Optimising performance of individuals and teams to improve patients’ outcomes”. Journal of Thoracic Disease. AME Publishing Company 11 (2019): S998-1008.
  18. Rystedt H and Sjöblom B. “Realism, authenticity, and learning in healthcare simulations: Rules of relevance and irrelevance as interactive achievements”. Instructional Science 5 (2012): 785-798.
  19. Shiralkar U and Bathla S. “Cognitive simulation”. Journal of Surgical Simulation (2017): B2-B2.
  20. Spencer F. “Teaching and measuring surgical techniques: the technical evaluation of competence”. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons 63 (1978): 9-12.
  21. Ragonese M., et al. “Psychological aptitude for surgery: The importance of non-technical skills”. Urologia 2 (2019): 45-51.
  22. Salas E., et al. “It is not how much you have but how you use it: Toward a rational use of simulatio to support aviation training”. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3 (2020): 197-208.


Citation: Suddhajit Sen. “Simulation Fidelity in the Context of Surgical Training in Orthopaedics". Acta Scientific Orthopaedics 5.9 (2022): 126-129.


Copyright: © 2022 Suddhajit Sen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In

News and Events

  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is May 30, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US