Acta Scientific Orthopaedics (ASOR) (ISSN: 2581-8635)

Research Article Volume 5 Issue 5

The Effects of Minimalist Shoes on the General Endurance in Long-Distance Recreational Runners

Chiara Modestini, Stephen Mizzi and Cynthia Formosa

Faculty of Health Science, University of Malta, Malta

*Corresponding Author: Cynthia Formosa, Faculty of Health Science, University of Malta, Malta. .

Received: March 22, 2022; Published: April 19, 2022

×

Abstract

Background: The difference in general endurance between running with a minimalist shoe versus structured footwear is a topic of debate amongst both runners and researchers. Studies investigating the effect of structured and minimalist footwear on general endurance are still lacking. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the difference between running in minimal versus structured footwear on endurance amongst long distance recreational runners.

Methods: Thirty healthy long distance recreational runners were recruited for this study. Treadmill running in two different shod conditions: ‘Trial 1’ with structured footwear and ‘Trial 2’ with minimalist footwear was conducted. The Bruce Treadmill Protocol was used to estimate the VO2 max of each athlete were the time taken to reach volitional exhaustion was recorded and interpreted via two equations depending on whether the participant was male or female. The results of the equations estimating the participants' VO2 max were compared between the two types of footwear.

Results: The results of this study found a significant difference in general endurance when wearing minimalist footwear versus structured footwear (p = 0.038), indicating a higher efficiency when running with minimalist footwear. No significant difference was found in the mean Borg 6-20 RPE (Rate of Perceived Exertion rating scores) between structured and minimalist footwear (p = 0.32). However, although no significant difference was found, it is important to note that whilst all the participants wearing both structured and minimalist footwear reached stage 7 on the BTP protocol, in stages 8 and 9 the number of participants in minimalist footwear exceeded those in structured footwear implying better endurance when using minimalist footwear.

Conclusion: This finding provides important information to the running community, clinicians and researchers alike with regards to the efficacy when using minimalist shoes in long distance running. Since physical exercise and sports are today being advocated as important elements to improve general health status and weight loss, with recreational running being picked up by many individuals, it is of utmost importance to provide recreational runners and their coaches with evidence-based information regarding potential implications when choosing the appropriate footwear for distance running.

Keywords: General Endurance; Minimalist Shoes; Structured Footwear; Long Distance Running

×

References

  1. Haniuk E., et al. “Active Stance: Minimalist footwear: A risky switch for runners?” Lower Extremity Review (2012).
  2. Rixe JA., et al. “The barefoot debate: Can minimalist shoes reduce running-related injuries?” Current Sports Medicine Reports3 (2012): 160-165.
  3. Grabiner M. The ankle and the foot. In P. Rasch. “Kinesiology and Applied Anatomy (p. 227). Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger (1989).
  4. Jenkins DW and Cauthon DJ. “Barefoot running claims and controversies: A review of the literature”. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association3 (2011): 231-246.
  5. Yamashita M. “Evaluation and selection of shoe wear and orthoses for the runner”. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 3 (2005): 801-829.
  6. Bootier J. “Biomechanical Efficiency and Metabolic Economy: Vibram Five Fingers Versus Conventional Running Shoes [dissertation]”. Department of Kinesiology, Sonoma State University. USA (2012).
  7. Clinghan R., et al. “Do you get value for money when you buy an expensive pair of running shoes?” British Journal of Sports Medicine3 (2008): 189-193.
  8. Esculier J., et al. “A consensus definition and rating scale for minimalist shoes”. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 42 (2015).
  9. Miller EE., et al. “The effect of minimal shoes on arch structure and intrinsic foot muscle strength”. Journal of Sport and Health Science 2 (2014): 74-85.
  10. Jones M and Carter H. “The effect of endurance training on parameters of aerobic fitness”. Sports Medicine 6 (2000): 373-386.
  11. Sokolowski M. “Morphofunctional aspects of selection of soldiers for realisation of tasks in the army formations (Vol. 11). Warsaw: PTNKF (2017).
  12. Heyward V and Gibson A. “Advanced Fitness Assessment and Exercise Prescription (7th edition)”. Champaign: Human Kinetics (2014).
  13. Rothschild C. “Running barefoot or in minimalist shoes: Evidence or conjecture?” Strength and Conditioning Journal2 (2012): 8-17.
  14. Paulson S and Braun WA. “Mechanical and physiological examination of barefoot and shod conditions in female runners”. International Journal of Sports Medicine 9 (2014): 789-793.
  15. Squadrone R and Gallozzi C. “Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners”. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 1 (2009): 6-13.
  16. Perl D., et al. “Effects of footwear and strike type on running economy”. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 44 (2012): 1335-1343.
  17. World Medical Association. ‘World medical association declaration of helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects”. JAMA (2013).
  18. American College of Sports Medicine. “ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (9th edition)”. Baltimore: Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams and Wilkins (2014).
  19. Vanhoy R. “A comparison of two different treadmill protocols in measuring maximal oxygen consumption in highly trained distance runners”. Chapel Hill (2012).
  20. Wilmore J and Costil D. “Physiology of Sport and Exercise (3rd). Human Kinetics Publishing (2005).
  21. Fair S. “Wellness and Physical Therapy”. Canada: Jones and Bartlett Publishers (2010).
  22. Gonzalez-Parra G., et al. “Maximal oxygen consumption in national elite triathletes that train in high altitude”. Journal of Human Sportas and Exercise 2 (2013): 342-349.
  23. Borg G. “Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales”. Champaign: Human Kinetics (1998).
  24. Flegal K., et al. “Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults”. JAMA 3 (2010): 235-241.
  25. Ho W. “The validity of predicting VO2max from RPE values elicited during PRET in endurance trained athletes” (2010).
  26. Dabney U and Butler M. “The predictive ability of the YMCA Test and Bruce Test for triathletes with different training backgrounds”. Emporia State Research Studies 1 (2006): 38-44.
  27. Lindlein K., et al. “Improving runnign economy by transitioning to minimilist footwear: A randomised controlled trial”. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 12 (2018): 1298-1303.
  28. Cochrum RG., et al. “Comparison of running economy values while wearing no shoes, minimal shoes, or normal running shoes”. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 3 (2015): 595-601.
  29.  
×

Citation

Citation: Cynthia Formosa., et al. “The Effects of Minimalist Shoes on the General Endurance in Long-Distance Recreational Runners". Acta Scientific Orthopaedics 5.5 (2022): 41-46.




Metrics

Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In



News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is December 25, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"

Contact US