Acta Scientific Orthopaedics (ASOR)(ISSN: 2581-8635)

Review Article Volume 4 Issue 9

Neuromuscular Re-Education Using Surface Electromyography Biofeedback

Magdalini Stamou*

Physiotherapy Department, Laboratory of Neuromuscular and Cardiovascular Study of Motion, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece

*Corresponding Author: Magdalini Stamou, Physiotherapy Department, Laboratory of Neuromuscular and Cardiovascular Study of Motion, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece.

Received: July 26, 2021; Published: August 12, 2021


This paper investigates the role of Surface Electromyography Biofeedback in neuromuscular re-education. It references the theoretical basis of biofeedback action, the physiological mechanism of the peripheral motor neuron, recruitment and modification of central stimulation and brain plasticity. This paper includes an analysis of the technical characteristics of surface electromyography as well as of the advantages and disadvantages of these applications.

Keywords: Surface Electromyography Biofeedback; Neuromuscular Re-Education; Electrophysical Agents; Assessment; Electrotherapy; Brain Plasticity


  1. Galvani L. “Green RM, trans: Commentary on the Effect of electricity on muscular motion”. Elizabeth Licht, Publisher (1953).
  2. Criswell E. “Cram’s introduction to surface electromyography second edition Jones and Bartlett Learning (2010).
  3. Schwartz MF. “Andrasc Biofeedback: a practitioner’s guide”. New York: Guilford Press (2003).
  4. Marinacci M Horande. "Electromyogram in Neuromuscular Re-education”. Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Society 25 (1960): 57-71.
  5. Adams JA. “A closed-loop theory of motor learning”. Journal of Motor Behavior2 (1971): 111-149.
  6. Chapman SL. “A review and clinical perspective on the use of EMG and thermal biofeedback for chronic headaches”. Pain1 (1986): 1-43.
  7. Wolf SL and Binder-MacLeod SA. “Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in lower extremity neuromuscular and functional status”. Physical Therapy9 (1983): 1404-1413.
  8. Holtermann A., et al. “The use of EMG biofeedback for learning of selective activation of intra-muscular parts within the serratus anterior muscle A novel approach for rehabilitation of scapular muscle imbalance”. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology2 (2010): 359-365.
  9. Cressman EK and Henriques DYP. “Sensory Recalibration of Hand Position Following Visuomotor Adaptation”. Journal of Neurophysiology 102 (2009): 3505-3518.
  10. Dunn TG., et al. “The learning process in biofeedback: Is it feed-forward or feedback?” Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback 11 (1986): 143-156.
  11. La Croix JM. “The acquisition of autonomic control through biofeedback: The case against an afferent process and a two process alternative”. Psychophysiology 18 (1981): 573-587.
  12. O’Callagh ME and Couvadelli B. “Use of Self-Instructional Strategies with Three ameliorating Neurologically Impaired Adults Cognitive”. Therapy and Research 22 (1998): 91-107.
  13. James C Rosen., et al. “Cognitive behavior therapy for negative body image”. Behavior Therapy 20 (1989): 393-404.
  14. De Craen AJ., et al. “Placebos and placebo effects in medicine: historical overview”. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 92 (1999): 511-515.
  15. Shapiro AK. “A historic and heuristic definition of the placebo”. Psychiatry27 (1964): 52-58.
  16. Price Donald D., et al. “A Comprehensive Review of the Placebo Effect: Recent Advances and Current Thought”. Annual Review of Psychology 59 (2008): 565-590.
  17. Levine JD., et al. “The mechanism of placebo analgesia”. Lancet 23 (1978): 654-657.
  18. Benedetti F., et al. “Neurobiological Mechanisms of the Placebo Effect”. The Journal of Neuroscience 25 (2005): 10390-10402.
  19. Mayberg HS., et al. “The Functional Neuroanatomy of the Placebo Effect”. The American Journal of Psychiatry 159 (2002): 728-737.
  20. Bandura A. “Self-efficacy”. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Edition.), Encyclopedia of human behavior New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Edition.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press 4 (1994): 71-81.
  21. Haynes R B., et al. “Systematic review of randomised trials of interventions to assist patients to follow prescriptions for medications”. Lancet 348 (1996): 383-386.
  22. Greenfield S., et al. “Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes”. Annals of Internal Medicine 102 (1985): 520-528.
  23. Alain Deccache. “Teaching, training or educating patients? Influence of contexts and models of education and care on practice in patient education Patient Education and”. Counseling 26 (1995): 119-129.
  24. Rosenthal R and Jacobson L. “Pygmalion in the Classroom”. New York: Holt Rinehart and Wilson (1968).
  25. Enhancing Human Performance: Background Papers”. Issues of Theory and Methodology (1988). Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education (CBASSE) Committee on Techniques for the Enhancement of Human Performance”. National Research Council (1988).
  26. Cronbach Lee Joseph and Snow Richard E. “Aptitudes and instructional methods: a handbook for research on interactions”. Irvington Publisher Inc (1981).
  27. Basmajian J. “Research foundation of EMG Biofeedback in Rehabilitation”. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 13 (1988): 4.
  28. Marinacci Horande M. “Electromyogram in Neuromuscular Re-education”. Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Society 25 (1960): 57-71.
  29. Wolf LS. “Electromyographic Biofeedback Applications to Stroke Patients A Critical Review”. Physical Therapy 63 (1983): 1448-1459.
  30. Wolf lS and Binder-Macleod S. “Electromyographic Biofeedback Applications to the Hemiplegic Patient Changes in Upper Extremity Neuromuscular and Functional Status”. Physical Therapy 63 (1983): 1393-1403.
  31. Woolf CJ and Salter MW. “Neuronal Plasticity: Increasing the Gain in Pain”. Science 288 (2000): 1765-1769.
  32. Elbert T., et al. “Increased Cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players”. Science 270 (1995): 305-307.
  33. Pourrier Salima D., et al. “Three cases of referred sensation in traumatic nerve injury of the hand: implications for understanding central nervous system reorganization”. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 42 (2010): 357-361.
  34. Merzenich MM., et al. “Progression of change following median nerve section in the cortical representation of the hand in areas 3b and 1 in adult owl and squirrel monkeys”. Neuroscience 10 (1983): 639-665.
  35. Merzenich MM and Jenkins WM. “Reorganization of cortical representations of the hand following alterations of skin inputs induced by nerve injury, skin island transfers, and experience”. The Journal of Hand Therapy 6 (1993): 89-104.
  36. Martinez M., et al. “Differential tactile and motor recovery and cortical map alteration after C4-C5 spinal hemisection”. Experimental Neurology 221 (2010): 186-197.
  37. Floyer-Lea A and Matthews PM. “Distinguishable Brain Activation Networks for Short- and Long-Term Motor Skill Learning”. Journal of Neurophysiology 94 (2005): 512-518.
  38. Su Jiang., et al. “Reorganization in motor cortex after brachial plexus avulsion injury and repair with the contralateral c7 root transfer in RATS”. Microsurgery 30 (2010): 314-320.
  39. Wall J T., et al. “Human brain plasticity: an emerging view of the multiple substrates and mechanisms that cause cortical changes and related sensory dysfunctions after injuries of sensory inputs from the body”. Brain Research Reviews 39 (2002): 181-215.
  40. Bayona NA., et al. “The role of task-specific training in rehabilitation therapies”. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation3 (2005): 58-65.
  41. Wolf S. “The First Basmajian Lecture: Reflections on John V. Basmajian: Anatomist, Electromyographer, Scientist”. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 7 (1997): 213-219.
  42. De Luca C J Adam A., et al. “Decomposition of Surface EMG Signals”. Journal of Neurophysiology 96 (2006): 1646-1657.
  43. McGill K., et al. “EMGLAB: An interactive EMG decomposition program”. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 149 (2005): 121-133.
  44. DeLuca CJ and Merletti R. “Surface myoelectric signal cross-talk among muscles of the leg. Electroencephalogr”. Clinical Neurophysiology 69 (1988): 568-575.
  45. Farina D., et al. “Surface EMG Crosstalk valuated from Experimental Recordings and Simulated Signals Reflections on Crosstalk Interpretation, Quantification and Reduction Methods”. Informatics Med 43 (2004): 30-35.
  46. Solomonow M., et al. “Surface and wire EMG crosstalk in neighbouring muscles”. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 4 (1994): 131-142.
  47. Kohei Watanabe a and Hiroshi Akima. “Cross-talk from adjacent muscle has a negligible effect on surface electromyographic activity of vastus intermedius muscle during isometric contraction”. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 19 (2009): 280-e289.
  48. CJ De Luca A Adam., et al. “Decomposition of Surface EMG Signals”. Journal of Neurophysiology 96 (2006): 1646-1657.
  49. Kleine BU., et al. “Influence of motoneuron firing synchronization on SEMG characteristics in dependence of electrode position”. Journal of Applied Physiology 91 (2001): 1588-1599.
  50. Rainoldi A and Melchiorri G Caruso I. “A method for positioning electrodes during surface EMG recordings in lower limb muscles”. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 134 (2004): 37-43.
  51. Ladd HW., et al. “Evaluation and prediction of regenerative processes by quantitative analysis of the electromyographic response and biofeedback in peripheral nerve injuries”. International Rehabilitation Medicine 3 (1981): 201-205.
  52. Bilodeau M., et al. “EMG frequency content changes with increasing force and during fatigue in the quadriceps femoris muscle of men and women”. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 13 (2003): 83-92.
  53. Sella GE. “Neuropathology Considerations: Clinical and SEMG/Biofeedback Applications”. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback 28 (2003): 93-105.
  54. SL Pullman., et al. “Clinical utility of surface EMG: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American”. Academy of Neurology 55 (2000): 171-177.
  55. Geisser M., et al. “Meta- Analytic Review of Surface Electromyography Among Persons With Low Back Pain and Normal, Healthy Controls”. The Journal of Pain 6 (2005): 711-726.
  56. Ladd HW., et al. “Evaluation and prediction of regenerative processes by quantitative analysis of the electromyographic response and biofeedback in peripheral nerve injuries”. International Rehabilitation Medicine 3 (1981): 201-205.
  57. Woodford H and Price C. “EMG biofeedback for the recovery of motor function after stroke”. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 18 (2007): 2.


Citation: Magdalini Stamou. “Neuromuscular Re-Education Using Surface Electromyography Biofeedback". Acta Scientific Orthopaedics 4.9 (2021): 40-48.


Copyright: © 2021 Magdalini Stamou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In

Subscribe to our newsletter

News and Events

  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is June 25, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US