Acta Scientific Orthopaedics (ISSN: 2581-8635)

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 6

Analysis of Combined Pelvic Ring and Acetabulum Fractures for their Optimal Management

Senthil Kumar Selvarajan*, Inder Gill, Nikil Shah, Vineet Trivedi, Ahmed Galhoum and Tanya Tradoff

Department of T and O, George Eliot Hospital NHS, UK

*Corresponding Author: Senthil Kumar Selvarajan, Department of T and O, George Eliot Hospital NHS, UK.

Received: April 27, 2021; Published: May 20, 2021

Abstract

Background: Pelvic fractures carry a huge burden on the current health care system and it has a high morbidity and mortality. The survivors carry a huge burden of complications which can have a lifetime implication, it is therefore imperative to understand the fracture pattern and plan for appropriate care which could be a key in optimal care of these critically injured patient. The classical classification system used for these fractures need to be adapted according to the mechanism of injury and severity of trauma which should also guide in decision making process.

Methods: In this retrospective study all pelvic trauma patients who attended Salford royal NHS foundation from 2015 to 2018 were retrieved then the patterns of fractures and mechanism of injury were analysed and correlated.

Results: Combined pelvic ring and acetabular fractures [5] can be sub-categorised into three groups according to mechanism of injury and fracture patterns:

  • Type 1: Road traffic collision causes fracture involving anteroposterior compression (APC) 1, 2, 3 along with Anterior wall (AW), Anterior Column (AC), associated both columns (ABC) variety, lateral compression fractures are rare in RTC, hemodynamic stability is dependent of grade of APC than acetabular fracture pattern and treatment can vary from non-operative to complex surgeries.
  • Type 2: Jumpers commonly sustain lateral compression (LC) and ABC pattern and have high Injury severity score (ISS) when compared to RTC, majority of them are hemodynamically unstable and require blood products and more often end up in a broad spectrum of pelvic surgery. Mortality rate is high, and we found nearly 30% of them die within 24 hours in our study.
  • Type 3: Cyclers and pedestrians have an equal incidence of type 1 and type 2 fractures and rarely presents with a combination of type 1 and 2. ISS, blood transfusion and mortality are like type 1 and type 2 combined fractures and treatment must be designed after a thorough understanding of fracture types. Often require complex surgery.

Keywords: Anteroposterior Compression (APC); Anterior Wall (AW); Anterior Column (AC); Associated Both Columns (ABC); Lateral Compression (LC); Injury Severity Score (ISS)

References

  1. Beck M., et al. “The acetabular blood supply: Implications for periacetabular osteotomies”. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 25 (2003): 361-367.
  2. Burgess AR., et al. “Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols”. The Journal of Trauma7 (1990): 848-856.
  3. Cosker TDA., et al. “Pelvic ramus fractures in the elderly: 50 patients studied with MRI”. Acta Orthopaedica 4 (2005): 513-516.
  4. Collins H. “Creative research- The theory and practice of Research for the creative industries- AVA publications (2010): 38.
  5. Dalal SA., et al. “Pelvic fracture in multiple trauma: Classification by mechanism is key to pattern of organ injury, resuscitative requirements, and outcome”. The Journal of Trauma7 (1989): 981-1000.
  6. Errel W., et al. “Control of severe haemorrhage using c clamp and pelvic packing in multiply injured patients with pelvic ring disruption”. Journal of Trauma and Orthopaedic 15 (2001): 468.
  7. Fox MA., et al. “Pelvic fractures: analysis of factors affecting pre hospital triage and patient outcomes”. Southern Medical Journal 83 (1990): 785.
  8. Ganz R., et al. “The anti shock pelvic clamp/ clinical application” 167 (1991): 71.
  9. Gänsslen A., et al. “Epidemiology of pelvic ring injuries”. Injury 27 (1996).
  10. Gertzbein SD and Chenoweth DR. “Occult injuries of the pelvic ring”. Clinical Orthopaedics 128 (1977): 202-207.
  11. Golden RD., et al. “How much vertical displacement of the symphysis indicates instability after pelvic injury?” The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery2 (2013): 585-589.
  12. Greenwald AS and O’Connor JJ. “The transmission of load through the human hip joint”. The Journal of Biomechanics 4 (1971): 507-528.
  13. Gray H. “Anatomy of the Human Body. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger; 1918. Bartleby (2000).
  14. Ghanyam AJ., et al. “The effects of laparotomy and external fixator stabilisation on pelvic volume /journal of trauma 38 (1995): 396.
  15. Gylling SF., et al. “Immediate external fixator application to unstable pelvic fractures”. American Journal of Surgery 150 (1985): 721.
  16. Holdsworth FW. “Dislocation and fracture dislocation of the pelvis”. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 30B (1948): 461.
  17. Jason J Halvorson., et al. “Combined acetabulum and pelvic ring injuries”. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 22 (2014): 304-314.
  18. Judet R., et al. “Fractures of the acetabulum: Classification and surgical approaches for open reduction.Preliminary report”. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American 46 (1964): 1615-1646.
  19. Köhnlein W., et al. “Acetabular morphology: Implications for joint-preserving surgery”. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 467 (2009): 682-691.
  20. Letournel E. “Aectabular fractures: Classification and management”. Clinical Orthopaedics 151 (1980): 81-123.
  21. Magnussen RA., et al. “Predicting blood loss in isolated pelvic and acetabular high-energy trauma”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma9 (2007): 603-607.
  22. Manson TT., et al. “Embolization of pelvic arterial injury is a risk factor for deep infection after acetabular fracturesurgery”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma1 (2013): 11-15.
  23. Gardner MJ and Farrell Matta JM. “Fractures of the acetabulum: Accuracy of reduction clinical results in patients managed operatively within three week after the injury”. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American11 (1996): 1632-1645.
  24. Marsh JL., et al. “Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma10 (2007): S1-S133.
  25. Mears SC and Berry DJ. “Outcomes of displaced and nondisplaced pelvic and sacral fractures in elderly adults”. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society7 (2011): 1309-1312.
  26. Oliver CW., et al. “Outcome after pelvic ring fractures: evaluation using the medical outcomes short form SF-36”. Injury 9 (1996): 635-641.
  27. Osgood GM., et al. “Combined pelvic ring disruption and acetabular fracture:Associated injury patterns in 40 patients”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma5 (2013): 243-247.
  28. Plaisier BR., et al. “Improved outcome afterearly fixation of acetabular fractures”. Injury2 (2000): 81-84.
  29. Pennal GF., et al. “Pelvic disruption: assessment and classification”. Clinical Orthopaedics 151 (1980): 12-21.
  30. Pohlemann T., et al. “The Hannover experience in management of pelvic fractures”. Clinical Orthopaedics 305 (1994): 69-80.
  31. Pohlemann T., et al. “Outcome after pelvic ring injuries”. Injury2 (1996): B31-38.
  32. Porter SE., et al. “Acetabular fracture patterns and their associated injuries”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma3 (2008): 165-170.
  33. Ponseti IV. “Growth and development of the acetabulum in the normal child. Anatomical, histological, and roentgenographic studies”. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American 60 (1978): 575-585.
  34. Prasad A and GG Lloyd. “Attempted suicide by jumping”. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 5 (1983): 394-396.
  35. Rommens PM and Hessmann MH. “Staged reconstruction of pelvic ring disruption: Differences in morbidity, mortality,radiologic results, and functional outcomes between B1, B2/B3, and C-type lesions”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2 (2002): 92-98.
  36. Richardson J., et al. “Open pelvic fracture”. The Journal of Trauma 22 (1982): 533.
  37. Simonian PT., et al. “Biomechanical simulation of the anteroposterior compression injury of the pelvis. An understanding of instability and fixation”. Clinical Orthopaedics 309 (1994): 245-256.
  38. Stover MD., et al. “Pelvic Ring Disruptions. In: Skeletal Trauma: Basic Science, Management and Reconstruction”. Fourth. Saunders Elsevier (2009): 1107-1169.
  39. Suzuki T., et al. “Longterm functional outcome after unstable pelvic ring fracture”. The Journal of Trauma4 (2007): 884-888.
  40. Suzuki T., et al. “Combined injuries of the pelvis and acetabulum: Nature of a devastating dyad”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma5 (2010): 303-308.
  41. The J., et al. “Jumpers and fallers: a comparison of the distribution of skeletal injury”. Clinical Radiology6 (2003): 482-486.
  42. Tibbs BM., et al. “DVAcetabular and isolated pelvic ring fractures: A comparison of initial assessment and outcome”. The American Surgeon: SAGE Journals6 (2008): 538-541.
  43. Tile M. “Pelvic ring fractures: Should they be fixed?” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British 1 (1988): 1-12.
  44. Tile M. “Acute Pelvic Fractures: I. Causation and Classification”. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons3 (1996): 143-151.
  45. Tile M and Olson S. “Decision making: Nonoperative and operative indications for acetabular fractures”. In Tile M, Helfet DL, Kellam : Fractures of the Pelvis and Acetabulum, ed 3. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins (2003): 496-532.
  46. Thompson JC and Netter FH. “Netter’s Concise Orthopaedic Anatomy”. 2nd edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier (2010).
  47. Young JW., et al. “Lateral compression fractures of the pelvis: the importance of plain radiographs in the diagnosis and surgical management”. Skeletal Radiology2 (1986):103109.
  48. Young JW., et al. “Pelvic fractures: value of plain radiography in early assessment and management Radiology 160.2 (1986): 445-451.
  49. Wasielewski LA., et al. “Acetabulum anatomy and transacetabular screw fixation in total hip arthroplasty”. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American 72 (1990): 501-508.
  50. Westerborn A. “Beitrage zur kenntniss der Beckenbrueche and Beckenluxationen”. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica 8 (1928).
  51. Wilenius R. “Ubher Beckenbrueche”. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica 79 (1973).
  52. Wright R., et al. “Acetabular fractures: long-term follow-up of open reduction and internal fixation”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma5 (1994): 397-403.

Citation

Citation: Senthil Kumar Selvarajan., et al. “Analysis of Combined Pelvic Ring and Acetabulum Fractures for their Optimal Management".Acta Scientific Orthopaedics 4.6 (2021): 37-45.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2021 Senthil Kumar Selvarajan., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor0.614

Indexed In



News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is September 30, 2021.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US