Acta Scientific Orthopaedics (ISSN: 2581-8635)

Review Article Volume 4 Issue 1

BOAST 4 Guidelines - Literature Review and Recommendations

Athanasios Serlis1*, Panagiotis Poulios2, Grigoris Bolgouras3, Panagiotis Konstantinou4, Georgios Konstantopoulos1

1Royal London Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, Barts NHS Trust, United Kingdom
2Newham University Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, Barts NHS Trust, United Kingdom
3Larnaca General Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, United Nations, Cyprus
4General Hospital of Thessaloniki G.Gennimatas, Greece

*Corresponding Author: Athanasios Serlis, Royal London Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, Barts NHS Trust, United Kingdom.

Received: November 30, 2020; Published: December 14, 2020

×

Abstract

  Open fractures constitute serious injuries which range from small puncture wounds trauma to high energy traumatic injuries. The British Orthopaedic Association and British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons have established evidence-based instructions for the assessment and management of open fractures in the pre-hospital and hospital setting. BOAST 4 (British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma 4) guidelines have introduced nineteen instructions which are aiming to address the problems that arise in the management of open fractures. Additionally, these guidelines provide detailed guidance to the clinicians regarding the decision-making process and raise awareness for the most common complications in order to enhance patients’ care and safety. This article aims to review the evidence of BOAST 4 guidelines and suggest modifications based on the current literature.

Keywords: Open Fracture; BOAST Guidelines; Management; Literature Review

×

References

  1. Weber D., et al. “Time to initial operative treatment following open fracture does not impact development of deep infection: a prospective cohort study of 736 subjects”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 1531-2291 (Electronic) 28.11 (2014): 613-619.
  2. Lack WD., et al. “Type III open tibia fractures: immediate antibiotic prophylaxis minimizes infection”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma1 (2015): 1-6.
  3. Hull PD., et al. “Delayed debridement of severe open fractures is associated with a higher rate of deep infection”. Bone and Joint Journal3 (2014): 379-384.
  4. Morgenstern M., et al. “The effect of local antibiotic prophylaxis when treating open limb fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis”. Bone Joint Research7 (2018): 447-456.
  5. Keating JF., et al. “Reamed Nailing of Open Tibial Fractures: Does the Antibiotic Bead Pouch Reduce the Deep Infection Rate?”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma5 (1996): 298-303.
  6. Naique SB., et al. “Management of severe open tibial fractures: the need for combined orthopaedic and plastic surgical treatment in specialist centres”. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery -British3 (2006): 351-357.
  7. Gopal S., et al. “Fix and flap: the radical orthopaedic and plastic treatment of severe open fractures of the tibia”. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery -British7 (2000): 959-966.
  8. Kumar MK., et al. “Salvage versus amputation: Utility of mangled extremity severity score in severely injured lower limbs”. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics3 (2007): 183-187.
  9. Fagelman MF., et al. “Mangled extremity severity score in children”. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics2 (2002): 182-184.
  10. Slauterbeck JR., et al. “Mangled extremity severity score: an accurate guide to treatment of the severely injured upper extremity”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma4 (1994): 282-285.
  11. Enninghorst N., et al. “Open tibia fractures: timely debridement leaves injury severity as the only determinant of poor outcome”. Journal of Trauma2 (2011): 352-335.
  12. Malhotra AK., et al. “Open extremity fractures: impact of delay in operative debridement and irrigation”. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery5 (2014): 1201-1207.
  13. Davis Sears E., et al. “Relationship between timing of emergency procedures and limb amputation in patients with open tibia fracture in the United States, 2003 to 2009”. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery2 (2012): 369-378.
  14. Fernandes M., et al. “Open fractures and the incidence of infection in the surgical debridement 6 hours after trauma”. Acta Ortopédica Brasileira1 (2015): 38-42.
  15. Benson DR., et al. “Treatment of open fractures: a prospective study”. Journal of Trauma 1 (1983): 25-30.
  16. D'Alleyrand JC., et al. “Is time to flap coverage of open tibial fractures an independent predictor of flap-related complications?” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma5 (2014): 288-293.
  17. Higgins TF., et al. “Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP)-the best available evidence on limb-threatening lower extremity trauma”. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 2 (2010): 233-239.
×

Citation

Citation: Athanasios Serlis., et al. “BOAST 4 Guidelines - Literature Review and Recommendations".Acta Scientific Orthopaedics 4.1 (2021): 38-42.




Metrics

Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In



News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is July 10, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US