Acta Scientific Orthopaedics (ISSN: 2581-8635)

Research Article Volume 3 Issue 10

Pressure Exerted Using a Pelvic Binder

Krunal Soni1* Mehool Acharya2 and Arpit Jariwala3

1Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, B. J. Medical College and Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
2Consultant Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeon, Southmead hospital, Bristol, UK
3Consultant Upper limb and Trauma Surgeon, NHS Tayside & University of Dundee, UK

*Corresponding Author: Krunal Soni, Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, B. J. Medical College and Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Received: September 01, 2020; Published: September 25, 2020

×

Abstract

Background: Pelvic Circumferential Compression Device (PCCDs) aids in temporary stabilisation of pelvic injuries, in a decrease of pelvic volume and thereby assisting in haemostasis. It is known that if PCCDs are applied for extended duration, damage to tissue can occur. This research helps to quantify the pressure exerted by two different PCCD (SAM Sling® and T-POD®) at four locations (anterior, right, left and sacral) in healthy volunteers.

Methods: SAM sling® and T-POD® were applied randomly on healthy volunteers and mean pressures was measured at locations (anterior, right, left and sacral) by pressure cuffs.

Results: A significant variation was noted in the pressure exerted by both PCCDs at the four locations. Pressures exerted at anterior locations were less than tissue damaging pressure of 9.3 kPa for both SAM Sling® and T-POD®. For volunteers with higher BMI the pressure exerted at right and left greater trochanter was greater than the tissue damaging pressure of 9.3 kPa for both SAM Sling® and T-POD®. However, the SAM-Sling® produced higher mean pressures on the left location as compared to the right location while T-POD® produced higher mean pressures on the right location as compared to the left location. This can be attributed to the different closing mechanism of both the PCCDs. Pressure exerted at the sacral location was always greater than the tissue damaging pressure of 9.3 kPa for both the PCCDs.

Conclusion: The results of this study in healthy volunteers presented that application of PCCD is associated with the development of high mean pressure at the right greater trochanter, left greater trochanter and sacral region and may lead to formation of pressure sores. However further research with a higher number of volunteers and testing of the results of this study in acute clinical scenario is needed to ascertain these findings from the current study.

Keywords: SAM sling®; Pelvic Binder; Pelvic Circumferential Compression Device (PCCDs)

×

References

  1. Dimitriou R and Giannoudis PV. “Pelvic fractures. Surgery - Oxford International Edition”. 30 (2012): 339-346.
  2. Meighan A., et al. “Pelvic fractures: the golden hour”. Injury 29 (1998): 211-213.
  3. Ghaemmaghami V., et al. “Effects of early use of external pelvic compression on transfusion requirements and mortality in pelvic fractures”. American Journal of Surgery 194 (2007): 720-723; discussion 723.
  4. Bircher MD. “Indications and techniques of external fixation of the injured pelvis”. Injury 27 (1996): B3-19.
  5. NUNN T., et al. “Immediate application of improvised pelvic binder as first step in extended resuscitation from life-threatening hypovolaemic shock in conscious patients with unstable pelvic injuries”. Injury 38 (2007): 125-128.
  6. Vohra R K and Mccollum C N. “Pressure sores”. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 309 (1994): 853-857.
  7. Hedrick-Thompson J K. “A review of pressure reduction device studies”. Journal of Vascular Nursing 10 (1992): 3-5.
  8. White C E., et al. “Haemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures”. Injury 40 (2009): 1023-1030.
  9. Krieg J C., et al. “Emergent stabilization of pelvic ring injuries by controlled circumferential compression: a clinical trial”. Journal of Trauma 59 (2005): 659-664.
  10. Croce M A., et al. “Emergent pelvic fixation in patients with exsanguinating pelvic fractures”. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 204 (2007): 935-939; discussion 940-942.
  11. Jowett A J and Bowyer G W. “Pressure characteristics of pelvic binders”. Injury 38 (2007) 118-21.
  12. Knops SP., et al. “Measurements of the exerted pressure by pelvic circumferential compression devices”. The open Orthopaedics Journal 4 (2010): 101-106.
  13. Bottlang M., et al. “Emergent management of pelvic ring fractures with use of circumferential compression”. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 84 (2002): 43-47.
  14. Spanjersberg W R., et al. “Effectiveness and complications of pelvic circumferential compression devices in patients with unstable pelvic fractures: a systematic review of literature”. Injury 40 (2009): 1031-1035.
  15. Van Vugt A B and Van Kampen A. “An unstable pelvic ring. The killing fracture”. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 88 (2010): 427-33.
  16. Bottlang M., et al. “Noninvasive reduction of open-book pelvic fractures by circumferential compression”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 16 (2002): 367-373.
  17. Gansslen A., et al. “Epidemiology of pelvic ring injuries”. Injury 27 (1996): S-a13-20.
  18. Grotz MR., et al. “Open pelvic fractures: epidemiology, current concepts of management and outcome”. Injury 36 (2005): 1-13.
  19. Henry W L JR. “The complications of diabetes mellitus”. Journal of the National Medical Association 79 (1987): 677-680.
  20. Krieg JC., et al. “Pelvic circumferential compression in the presence of soft-tissue injuries: a case report”. Journal of Trauma 59 (2005): 470-472.
  21. Lerner A., et al. “External fixation for temporary stabilization and wound management of an open pelvic ring injury with extensive soft tissue damage: case report and review of the literature”. Journal of Trauma 65 (2008): 715-718.
  22. Manson T., et al. “Young-Burgess classification of pelvic ring fractures: does it predict mortality, transfusion requirements, and non-orthopaedic injuries?”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 24 (2010): 603-639.
  23. Mccormack R., et al. “Diagnosis and management of pelvic fractures”. Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases 68 (2010): 281-291.
  24. Mcmurtry R., et al. “Pelvic disruption in the polytraumatized patient: a management protocol”. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1980): 22-30.
  25. PHILLIPS T J., et al. “Bilateral Morel-Lavallee lesions after complex pelvic trauma: a case report”. Journal of Trauma 65 (2008): 708-711.
  26. Sathy A K., et al. “The effect of pelvic fracture on mortality after trauma: an analysis of 63,000 trauma patients”. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 91 (2009): 2803-2810.
  27. Schaller T M., et al. “Skin breakdown following circumferential pelvic antishock sheeting: a case report”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 19 (2005): 661-665.
  28. Stover M D., et al. “Three-dimensional analysis of pelvic volume in an unstable pelvic fracture”. Journal of Trauma 61 (2006): 905-908.
×

Citation

Citation: Krunal Soni. “Pressure Exerted Using a Pelvic Binder".Acta Scientific Orthopaedics 3.10 (2020): 39-52.




Metrics

Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In



News and Events


  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is May 25, 2022.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of “Best Article of the Issue”.
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.
  • Contact US