Acta Scientific Orthopaedics (ISSN: 2581-8635)

Short Communication Volume 3 Issue 1

The Use of an Internet “Expert System” to Improve Income for an Orthopedic Surgeon

Nelson Hendler*

Former Assistant Professor of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Past President-American Academy of Pain Management

*Corresponding Author: Former Assistant Professor of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Past President-American Academy of Pain Management.

Received: December 16, 2019; Published: December 26, 2019


  For most orthopedic surgeons, evaluating chronic pain patients is often time-consuming and frustrating. There are many complicating factors, since often legal issues cloud the evaluation, and medication can become a problem as well, for both the physician and patient. Therefore, a tested evaluation method, from leading hospitals in the country, could prove helpful.



  1. Hendler NH and Kozikowski JG. “Overlooked physical diagnoses in chronic pain patients involved in litigation”. Psychosomatics 34.6 (1993): 494-501. 
  2. Hendler N., et al. “Overlooked physical diagnoses in chronic pain patients in litigation, Part 2”. Psychosomatics 37.6 (1996): 509-517. 
  3. Hendler N. “Differential diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome”. Pan Arab Journal of Neurosurgery 6.2 (2002): 1-9. 
  4. Dellon AL., et al. “CRPS of the upper or lower extremity: surgical treatment outcomes”. Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury 4.1 (2009): 1. 
  5. Long DM., et al. “Fusion for occult post-traumatic cervical facet injury”. Neurosurgery Quarterly 16.3 (2006): 129-135. 
  6. Landro L. The Wall Street Journal 17 (2013).
  7. Sandhu HS., et al. “Association between findings of provocative discography and vertebral endplate signal changes as seen on MRI”. Journal of Spinal Disorders 13.5 (2000): 438-443. 
  8. Zinreich SJ., et al. “Three-dimensional CT imaging in postsurgical “failed back” syndrome”. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 14.4 (1990): 574-580. 
  9. Wellens HJ and Brugada P. “Antiarrhythmic therapy”. The value of the history of the patient”. European Heart Journal 8 (1987): 71-75.
  10. Linzer M., et al. “Diagnosing syncope. Part 1: Value of history, physical examination, and electrocardiography. Clinical Efficacy Assessment Project of the American College of Physicians”. Annals of Internal Medicine126.12 (1997): 989-996.
  11. Rhoades DR., et al. “Speaking and interruptions during primary care office visits”. Family Medicine 33.7 (2001): 528-532.
  12. Gottschalk A and Flocke S. “Time Spent in Face-to-Face Patient Care and Work Outside the Examination Room”. The Annals of Family Medicine 3.6 (2005): 488-493.
  13. Metaxiotis KS and Samouilidis JE. “Expert systems in medicine: academic exercise or practical tool?” Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology 24 (2000): 68-72.
  14. Engelbrecht R. “Expert systems for medicine—functions and developments”. Zentralbl Gynakol 119 (1997): 428-434.
  15. Babic A. “Knowledge discovery for advanced clinical data management and analysis”. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 68 (1999): 409-413.
  16. Lavine M What is Bayesian statistics and why everything else is wrong
  17. Lavine MS. “Optimum human input”. Science 356.6344 (2017): 1243-1244.
  18. Lavine MS.  “Filtering through to what's important”. Science 356.6343 (2017): 1134-1136.
  19. Hendler N., et al. “Comparison of Clinical Diagnoses Versus Computerized Test Diagnoses Using the Mensana Clinic Diagnostic Paradigm (Expert System) for Diagnosing Chronic Pain in the Neck, Back and Limbs”. Pan Arab Journal of Neurosurgery (2007): 8-17.
  20. Landi A., et al. “Diagnoses from an On-Line Expert System for Chronic Pain Confirmed by Intra-Operative Findings”. Journal of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 1.1 (2016): 1-7.
  21. Hendler N. “Validating and Treating the Complaint of Chronic Back Pain: The Mensana Clinic Approach,” in Clinical Neurosurgery. Edited by P Black, E. Alexander, D. Barrow 35.20 (1988): 385-397.
  22. Talo S., et al. “Effects of Active and Completed Litigation on Treatment Results: Workers Compensation Patients Compared with Other Litigation Patients”. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 31 (1989): 265-270. 


Citation: Nelson Hendler. “The Use of an Internet “Expert System” to Improve Income for an Orthopedic Surgeon"Acta Scientific Orthopaedics 3.1 (2020): 23-26.


Acceptance rate33%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days

Indexed In

News and Events

  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is June 25, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US