Acta Scientific Otolaryngology (ASOL) (ISSN: 2582-5550)

Research Article

Volume 8 Issue 3
Comparative Study of Maxillary Sinus Ostium Preservation Technique Versus Wide Middle Meatotomy Technique in Management of Chronic Maxillary Sinusitis

Shaimaa Mohamed Abo Elfath Elkhalifa*, Soad Yehia Mostafa, Yasser Mohamed Fawzy Elbeltagy, Tawfik Abdelatty Alkholy, Tahany Mohamed Rabie and Alshimaa Ahmed Ezzat Mohammed

Department of ENT, ALazhar – University, Faculty of Medicine for Girls, Egypt

*Corresponding Author: Shaimaa Mohamed Abo Elfath Elkhalifa, Department of ENT, ALazhar – University, Faculty of Medicine for Girls, Egypt.

Received: March 11, 2026; Published: May 20, 2026

Introduction: E.S.S focuses on treating the underlying cause of the problem. This permits direct visualization of the maxillary sinuses and diseased or obstructive tissue which can be removed if necessary. There is often less removal of normal tissue and surgery can frequently be performed on an outpatient basis.

Objectives: A Hospital based case control study will be performed at Department of Otorhinolaryngology AlZahrae university hospital

Methods: 30 patients with bilateral Chronic Rhinosinusitis not responding to proper medical treatment. Each of the thirty patients of the study group will undergo randomly uncinectomy with ostium preservation technique on one side and uncinectomy with middle meatal antrostomy on the other side.

Keywords: Maxillary Sinus Ostium Preservation; Middle Meatotomy; Chronic Maxillary Sinusitis

References

  1. Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology1 (2015): 16.
  2. Albu S and Tomescu E. “Small and large middle meatus antrostomies in the treatment of chronic maxillary sinusitis”. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery4 (2004): 542-547.
  3. Catalano PJ. “Minimally invasive technique”. 17.3 (2006): 189-196.
  4. Subha Soumya Dany. “Middle Meatal Antrostomy in the Management of Chronic Maxillary Sinusistis”. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences3 (2018).
  5. Fokkens WJ., et al. “European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020”. Rhinology 58 (2020): 1-464.
  6. Karnataka ENT Hospital and Research Center Apr 15, (2017).
  7. Jiang Jina. “Efficacy of different treatment methods under endoscope for the ostium of maxillary sinus”. Journal of Shanxi Medical University (2015): Corpus ID: 75206987 Medicine.
  8. Kennedy DW., et al. “Endoscopic middle meatal antrostomy: theory, technique, and patency”. Laryngoscope 8 (1987): 1-9.
  9. Reda Kamel. “Nasal endoscopy in chronic maxillary sinusitis”. Cairo University April 1989 PubMed, The Journal of Laryngology and Otology3 (1989): 275-278.
  10. T Ishibashi., et al. “Endoscopic sinus surgery for unilateral chronic sinusitis) clinical trial”. 102.7 (1999): 871-877.
  11. F Lavigne., et al. “Prognosis and prediction of response to surgery in allergic patients with chronic sinusitis”. Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology4 (2000): 746-751.
  12. Levine HL. “Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: evaluation, surgery, and follow-up of 250 patients”. Laryngoscope1 (1990): 79-84.
  13. Annika Luukkainen., et al. “Endoscopic Sinus Surgery with Antrostomy Has Better Early Endoscopic Recovery in Comparison to the Ostium-Preserving Technique”. International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Otolaryngology (2012): Article ID 189383.
  14. J Myller., et al. “Effect of endoscopic sinus surgery on antral mucociliary clearance”. Rhinology3 (2006): 193-196.
  15. Myller JP., et al. “Satisfaction with maxillary sinus surgery might be influenced by risk factors”. Allergy Rhinology (Providence)1 (2013): e6-e12.
  16. Okushi T., et al. “A modified Lund-Mackay system for radiological evaluation of chronic rhinosinusitis”. Auris Nasus Larynx6 (2013): 548-553.
  17. Rodney J., et al. “Musc health”. Medical University of South Carolina (2008).
  18. N Salama., et al. “Benefit from the minimally invasive sinus technique”. The Journal of Laryngology and Otology2 (2008): 186-190.
  19. Salam MA and Cable HR. “Middle meatal antrostomy: long-term patency and results in chronic maxillary sinusitis. A prospective study”. Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences2 (1993): 135-138.
  20. Praveen Singh., et al. “Approach to uncinectomy by swing door technique vs standard technique – a comparative study”. International Journal of Scientific Research (2021).
  21. Elina Toskala and Markus Rautiainen. “Effects of surgery to the function of maxillary sinus mucosa”. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology3 (2005): 236-240.
  22. P J Wormald and M McDonogh. “The 'swing-door' technique for uncinectomy in endoscopic sinus surgery”. Journal of Laryngology and Otology6 (1998): 547-551.
  23. Wadwongtham W and Aeumjaturapat S. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand2 (2003): S373-S378.

Citation

Citation: Shaimaa Mohamed Abo Elfath Elkhalifa., et al. “Comparative Study of Maxillary Sinus Ostium Preservation Technique Versus Wide Middle Mea- totomy Technique in Management of Chronic Maxillary Sinusitis". Acta Scientific Otolaryngology 8.3 (2026): 17-25.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2026 Shaimaa Mohamed Abo Elfath Elkhalifa., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate34%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor0.871

Indexed In







News and Events


  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be provided with the Publication Certificate after their successful publication
  • Last Date for submission
    Authors are requested to submit manuscripts on/before May 30, 2026, for the upcoming issue of 2026.

Contact US