Acta Scientific Otolaryngology (ASOL) (ISSN: 2582-5550)

Research Article Volume 7 Issue 6

Understanding Conversational Success in Hearing Loss: A Group Mapping Study

C Pachaiappan1*, Cherukuri Ramya Sri2, Sarah Zahir3, Victor Rexton L4, Prithi H5 and Krithika C5

1Assisstant Professor, Department of Audiology, MERF Institute of Speech and Hearing (P) Ltd, India
2Clinical Supervisor, Department of Audiology, MERF Institute of Speech and Hearing (P) Ltd, India
3Postgraduate (II Year), Department of Audiology, MERF Institute of Speech and Hearing (P) Ltd, India
4Undergraduate, Department of Audiology, MERF Institute of Speech and Hearing (P) Ltd, India
5Undergraduate (III Year), Department of Audiology, MERF Institute of Speech and Hearing (P) Ltd, India

*Corresponding Author: Pachaiappan C, Assisstant Professor, Department of Audiology, MERF Institute of Speech and Hearing (P) Ltd, India.

Received: May 12, 2025; Published: June 09, 2025

Abstract

Importance: This study investigates factors that influence conversation success for adults with cochlear implants (CI) and hearing impairment (IH), focusing on both individual and group conversational contexts. Understanding these factors can inform strategies to enhance communication outcomes.

Methods: A Group Concept Mapping (GCM) approach was used with 20 participants aged 50–75 years who have experience using CI or IH aids. Participants generated statements about what makes a conversation successful, sorted them into conceptually similar groups, and rated their importance. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis were applied to produce a conceptual framework.

Results: Seven thematic clusters were identified: (1) Being able to listen easily, (2) Being spoken to in a helpful way, (3) Being engaged and accepted, (4) Sharing information as desired, (5) Perceiving flowing and balanced interaction, (6) Feeling positive emotions, and (7) Not having to engage coping mechanisms. Ratings indicated that these factors were viewed as more critical in group conversations than in 1-to-1 settings, with CI users particularly highlighting the difficulties of group interactions.

Outcomes: The study's outcomes provide a structured understanding of what makes conversations successful from the perspective of adults with hearing loss. These insights can guide the development of targeted communication training, inform best practices for conversational partners, and shape clinical interventions aimed at improving social participation and quality of life for CI and IH users.

Conclusions: The findings underscore the multifaceted nature of conversation success, pointing to the need for both technological solutions and communication partner strategies to foster effective and satisfying conversations for adults with hearing loss.

Keywords: Tinnitus Handicap Inventory; Reliability; Cultural Translation

References

  • Bennett R., et al. “Investigating the Knowledge, Skills, and Tasks Required for Hearing Aid Management: Perspectives of Clinicians and Hearing Aid Owners”. American Journal of Audiology1 (2018): 67-84.
  • Ronnberg J., et al. “Cognitive Hearing Science and Ease of Language Understanding”. International Journal of Audiology5 (2019): 247-261.
  • Holman J., et al. “A Qualitative Investigation of the Hearing and Hearing-aid Related Emotional States Experienced by People with Hearing Loss”. (2021).
  • Holman JA., et al. “Hearing Impairment and Daily-life Fatigue: A Qualitative Study”. International Journal of Audiology7 (2019): 408-416.
  • Garrod S and M J Pickering. “Why is Conversation So Easy?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences1 (2004): 8-11.
  • Trochim W., et al. “Using Concept Mapping to Develop a Conceptual Framework of Staff’s Views of a Supported Employment Program for Individuals with Severe Mental Illness”. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology4 (1994): 766-775.
  • Trochim W. “An Introduction to Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation”. Evaluation and Program Planning 1 (1989): 1-16.
  • Tye-Murray N. “Conversational Fluency of Children Who Use Cochlear Implants”. Ear and Hearing1 (2003): 82-89.
  • Holler J and K Wilkin. “Co-Speech Gesture Mimicry in the Process of Collaborative Referring during Face-to-Face Dialogue”. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour 35 (2011): 133-153.
  • Lind C., et al. “Conversation Repair and Adult Cochlear Implantation: A Qualitative Case Study”. Cochlear Implants International1 (2006): 33-48.
  • Picou E., et al. “How Hearing Aids, Background Noise, and Visual Cues Influence Objective Listening Effort”. Ear and Hearing5 (2013): e52-e64.
  • Rosas S and M Kane. “Quality and Rigor of the Concept Mapping Methodology: A Pooled Study Analysis”. Evaluation and Program Planning2 (2012): 236-245.
  • Rubin R B., et al. “Conceptualization and Measurement of Interpersonal Communication Motives I Shape and Nurture Their Self-concepts, Make Decisions About”. Human Communication Research4 (1988): 602-628.
  • Scarborough R and G Zellou. “Clarity in Communication: “Clear” Speech Authenticity and Lexical Neighborhood Density Effects in Speech Production and Perception”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 5 (2013): 3793-3807.
  • Stephens GJ., et al. “Speaker-listener Neural Coupling Underlies Successful Communication”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 32 (2010): 14425-14430.
  • Strawbridge WJ., et al. “Negative Consequences of Hearing Impairment in Old Age a Longitudinal Analysis”. The Gerontologist3 (2000): 320-326.
  • Nicoras R., et al. “Conversation success in one-to-one and group conversation: A group concept mapping study of adults with normal and impaired hearing”. International Journal of Audiology 9 (2023): 868-876.
  • Citation

    Citation: C Pachaiappan., et al. “Understanding Conversational Success in Hearing Loss: A Group Mapping Study ".Acta Scientific Otolaryngology 7.7 (2025): 08-14.

    Copyright

    Copyright: © 2025 C Pachaiappan., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




    Metrics

    Acceptance rate34%
    Acceptance to publication20-30 days
    Impact Factor0.871

    Indexed In







    News and Events


    • Certification for Review
      Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.

    Contact US