Nisreen Al-Musaileem, Yusuf Gulleth and Peter Catalano*

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

*Corresponding Author: Peter Catalano, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Received: March 11, 2025; Published: April 12, 2025

Abstract

Background: Chronic rhinitis, including allergic rhinitis (AR) and non-allergic rhinitis (NAR), affects millions of individuals, with a significant burden in pediatric populations. Vasomotor rhinitis (VMR), a subtype of NAR, is characterized by nasal symptoms of congestion and watery discharge. Cryoablation (CA) of the posterior nasal nerves (PNN) using the Clarifix™ device has shown efficacy in adults, but data on its application in pediatric patients is lacking.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, feasibility, and effectiveness of cryoablation of the PNN in pediatric patients with AR and VMR.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 97 pediatric patients aged 4-12 years who underwent cryoablation using the Clarifix™ device between January 2018 and December 2022. Patients included in the study were diagnosed with AR or VMR and underwent cryoablation during nasal surgeries such as septoplasty, endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), turbinate reduction, or adenoidectomy. Collected data included demographic information, preoperative and postoperative medical treatments, intraoperative and postoperative complications/side effects, and symptomatic improvement measured by the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS).

Results: The study population consisted of 65 males (67%) and 32 females (33%), with a mean age of 7.5 years. Indications for surgery were VMR (70%) and AR (30%). A majority of our patients complained of nasal obstruction due to Grade 4 inferior hypertrophy (68%), middle turbinate concha bullosa (65%) and paradoxical middle turbinate (29%). Only 3 cases (3%) aborted due to inability to access the PNN region, primarily in younger children at age 4 years. There were no intra-operative complications and postoperative side effects were rare. Mild pain was reported in 1% of patients immediately post-op; bleeding and sinusitis, which occurred in 2%, was unrelated to the cryotherapy procedure. No other complications were reported postoperatively. Significant reduction in TNSS scores post-op showed effectiveness of the procedure (mean TNSS reduction from 7.03 to 2.23; p < 0.001, with VMR patients experiencing the greatest benefit (6.33 to 0.61; p < 0.001. Post-operative use of nasal steroid spray (20% of VMR patients) was not required for any patient with VMR.

Conclusion: Cryoablation of the posterior nasal nerves under general anesthesia is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment for pediatric patients with chronic rhinitis. The procedure demonstrates a high success rate in improving symptoms, particularly in patients with VMR and AR, making it a viable option for managing chronic rhinitis in children.

Keywords:Chronic Rhinitis (CR); Allergic Rhinitis (AR); Vasomotor Rhinitis (VMR)

References

1. Dykewicz MSJJoa. “Immunology c. 7”. Rhinitis and Sinusitis2 (2003): S520-S529.
2. Druce HM. editor Chronic rhinitis. Allergy and Asthma Proceedings: Ocean Side Publications (1990).
3. Dykewicz MS and Hamilos DLJJoA. “Rhinitis and Sinusitis”. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology2 (2010): S103-S15.
4. Kaliner MAJI. “Nonallergic rhinopathy (formerly known as vasomotor rhinitis)”. Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America3 (2021): 441-455.
5. Kaliner MAJFP. “Recognizing and treating nonallergic rhinitis”. 27.8 (2002): 20.
6. Mandhane SN., et al. “Allergic rhinitis: an update on disease, present treatments and future prospects”. International Immunopharmacology1 (2011): 1646-1662.
7. Cingi C., et al. “Update on the medical treatment of allergic rhinitis”. Inflammation and Allergy - Drug Targets 2 (2009): 96-103.
8. Ow RA., et al. “Cryosurgical ablation for treatment of rhinitis: two‐year results of a prospective multicenter study”. Laryngoscope9 (2021): 1952-1957.
9. Desai V., et al. “Cryoablation for the treatment of chronic rhinitis: a systematic review”. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery1 (2023): s40463-023-00645-6.
10. Erinjeri JP., et al. “Cryoablation: mechanism of action and devices”. 21.8 (2010): S187-S91.
11. Singh AK., et al. “Adverse events associated with ClariFix posterior nasal nerve cryoablation: a MAUDE database analysis”. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery4 (2021): 597-601.
12. Young K., et al. “Efficacy of cryoablation on chronic rhinitis management: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 4 (2023): 502-511.
13. Scott GD and Fryer AD. “Role of parasympathetic nerves and muscarinic receptors in allergy and asthma”. Allergy and the Nervous System. 98: Karger Publishers (2012): 48-69.
14. Hwang PH., et al. “Cryosurgical posterior nasal tissue ablation for the treatment of rhinitis”. International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology: Wiley Online Library (2017).
15. Marshak T., et al. “A systematic review of the evidence base for vidian neurectomy in managing rhinitis”. 130.S4 (2016): S7-S28.
16. Senanayake P., et al. “Efficacy of vidian neurectomy and posterior nasal neurectomy in the management of nonallergic rhinitis: a systematic review”. American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy6 (2022): 849-871.
17. Gerka Stuyt JA., et al. “Evaluation of in-office cryoablation of posterior nasal nerves for the treatment of rhinitis”. Allergy Rhinology (Providence) 12 (2021): 2152656720988565.
18. Ryan WR., et al. “Correlations between symptoms, nasal endoscopy, and in‐office computed tomography in post‐surgical chronic rhinosinusitis patients”. Laryngoscope 3 (2011): 674-678.
19. Schmale IL., et al. “The role of CT and endoscopy in the evaluation of patients referred for intranasal Cryoablation”. American Journal of Otolaryngology4 (2021): 102971.
20. Moore P., et al. “Clinical predictors of chronic rhinosinusitis: do the Canadian clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic rhinosinusitis predict CT-confirmation of disease?” Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery1 (2016): 65.
21. Settipane RA and Charnock. “Epidemiology of rhinitis: allergic and nonallergic”. 19 (2007): 23-34.
22. Virani FR., et al. “The impact of surgical posterior nasal nerve cryoablation on symptoms and disease-specific quality of life in patients with chronic rhinitis”. Ear, Nose and Throat Journal10 (2023): 654-660.

Citation

Citation: Peter Catalano., et al. “Cryoablation of the Posterior Nasal Nerves in Pediatric Patients with Chronic Rhinitis: A 5-Year Experience".Acta Scientific Otolaryngology 7.4 (2025): 08-16.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2025 Peter Catalano., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.