Evaluation of Pre and Post-Operative Pulmonary Function Tests in Patients with Nasal Septal Deformity
Arjun Saini and Brajpal Singh Tyagi*
Junior Consultant, Professor, Harsh ENT Hospital, RDC, Ghaziabad, India
*Corresponding Author: Brajpal Singh Tyagi, Junior Consultant, Professor, Harsh ENT Hospital, RDC, Ghaziabad, India.
Received:
April 07, 2023; Published: August 10, 2023
Abstract
Background: Deviation of septum leads to dysfunction of the respiratory system and this affects the functions and vitality of other related systems. Pulmonary function tests give valuable information on the state of airways, lung volumes and lung functions.
Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness of nasal septal correction on pulmonary function tests in symptomatic deviated nasal septum cases.
Methods and Material: A total of 50 patients with deviated nasal septum were involved in the study. Demographic data, clinical and physical examination including anterior rhinoscopy and diagnostic nasal endoscopy was performed. Diagnostic nasal endoscopy employed to study nasal septal deformity in particular and other structures of nasal cavity in general. Also, Cottle’s line was used to classify deviations as anterior or posterior and to note deviation in particular Cottle’s area. RMS Helios 401 spirometer was used to perform pulmonary function tests. Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume (FEV1) in 1 second, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and the ratio of FEV1 to FVC (FEV1/FVC) were the parameters measured.
Statistical Analysis: SPSS V. 24.
Results: The deviation was most commonly seen on the left side (52%), affecting mostly the cartilaginous septum (52%). After septoplasty, the post-operative values of FVC, FEV1, peak expiratory flow rate and FEV1/FVC were higher than the preoperative values and the results were statistically significant. Barring some age groups, especially elderly age group, marked improvement in FVC, FEV1 and FEV1/FVC was observed. There was more improvement in FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC following correction of posterior deviation while improvement in PEFR is more following correction of anterior deviation.
Conclusions: Correction of deviated nasal septum leads to a favorable outcome on nasal obstruction as well as pulmonary function. This has been corroborated and endorsed by the improvement in the mean values of various PFT parameters analyzed in this study. Pathophysiological processes that affect one component of this integrated system often concurrently impact other portions of the airway and by virtue of this isolated disease in one area has potential to infringe on the other areas also.
Keywords: Deviated Nasal Septum; Pulmonary Function Tests; Septoplasty
References
- Sykes J., et al. “The Importance of the Nasal Septum in the Deviated Nose”. Facial Plastic Surgery5 (2011): 413-421.
- Godley FA. “Nasal septal anatomy and its importance in septal reconstruction”. Ear Nose and Throat Journal8 (1997): 498-501.
- Kurtaran H., et al. “The effect of anterior nasal packing with airway tubes on pulmonary function following septoplasty”. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 39 (2009): 537-540.
- Ogura JH., et al. “Baseline values in pulmonary mechanics for physiologic surgery of the nose. Preliminary report”. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology3 (1968): 367-397.
- Ogura JH., et al. “Experimental observations of the relationships between upper airway obstruction and pulmonary function”. 85 (1964): 40-64.
- Ibrahim G and Bioprabhu S. “Deviated nasal septum correction by septoplasty with turbinoplasty and intranasal flexible plastic splint”. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences12 (2015): 106-108.
- Krouse JH. “The Unified Airway—Conceptual Framework”. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 2 (2008): 257-266.
- Chowdhury T., et al. “The Trigeminocardiac Reflex — An Example of Reflexive Heart Rhythm Change”. Abnormal Heart Rhythms5 (2015): e484.
- Hagy GW and Settipane GA. “Risk factors for developing asthma and allergic rhinitis. A 7-year follow-up study of college students”. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2 (1976): 330-336.
- Guerra S., et al. “Rhinitis as an independent risk factor for adult-onset asthma”. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 3 (2002): 419-425.
- Huovinen E., et al. “Incidence and prevalence of asthma among adult Finnish men and women of the Finnish Twin Cohort from 1975 to 1990, and their relation to hay fever and chronic bronchitis”. Chest 4 (1999): 928-936.
- Ibrahim G and Bioprabhu S. “Deviated nasal septum correction by septoplasty with turbinoplasty and intranasal flexible plastic splint”. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences12 (2021): 106-108.
- Panicker V and Belaldavar B. “Effectiveness of septoplasty on pulmonary function tests in symptomatic deviated nasal septum cases: a prospective study”. International Journal Of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 3 (2018): 800-807.
- Nanda Manpreet K and Mandeep D Rama. “Impact of septoplasty on pulmonary function”. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology (2019).
- Tuzuner A., et al. “Pulmonary function improvement following septoplasty: How lower airways are effected?” European Respiratory Journal 44 (2014): P3665.
- Teul I., et al. “Deformation of the nasal septum in children, adolescents, and adults in Western Pomerania Province of Poland”. European Journal of Medical Research 4 (2009): 244-247.
- Mladina R and Subarić M. “Are some septal deformities inherited? Type 6 revisited”. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology12 (2003): 1291-1294.
- Rehman A., et al. “A Prospective Study of Nasal Septal Deformities in Kashmiri Population Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital”. International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery3 (2012): 77-84.
- Salih A., et al. “Assessment of nasal septal deformities by anterior rhinoscopy and nasal endoscopy”. (2010): 14-20.
- Peacock MR. “Sub-mucous resection of the nasal septum”. Journal of Laryngology and Otology4 (1981): 341-356.
- Verma D., et al. “Comparative evaluation of conventional versus endoscopic septoplasty for deviated nasal septum”. Otolaryngology Open Access Journal 3 (2016): 000112.
- Garcia GJM., et al. “Septal Deviation and Nasal Resistance: An Investigation using Virtual Surgery and Computational Fluid Dynamics”. American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy 1 (2010): 46-53.
- James JEA., et al. “Reflex respiratory and cardiovascular effects of stimulation of receptors in the nose of the dog”. Journal of Physiology3 (1972): 673-696.
- Whicker JH and Kern EB. “The Nasopulmonary Reflex in the Awake Animal”. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology3 (1973): 355-358.
- Bulcun E., et al. “Effects of septoplasty on pulmonary function tests in patients with nasal septal deviation”. Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2 (2010): 196-202.
- Mengi E., et al. “Evaluation of operation success in patients with nasal septal deviation with quality of life scale and objective methods”. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat 4 (2011): 184-191.
- Shturman-Ellstein R., et al. “The beneficial effect of nasal breathing on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction”. The American Review of Respiratory Disease Returns 1 (1978): 65-73.23.
- Niedzielska G., et al. “Assessment of pulmonary function and nasal flow in children with adenoid hypertrophy”. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology3 (2008): 333-335.
- Karuthedath S., et al. “Impact of Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery on the Pulmonary Function of Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Prospective Study”. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 4 (2014): 441-448.
Citation
Copyright