Study of Maxillary Canine Index as a Forensic Tool
Deepanshi B Sutaria*, Bhupesh Patel, Jigar Purani, Grishma Amin, Himani Tiwari, Rina Mehta and Neelam Parikh
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dental Science, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
*Corresponding Author: Deepanshi B Sutaria, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dental Science, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.
Received:
March 20, 2023; Published: April 14, 2023
Abstract
To investigate the potential of odontometric morphometry of maxillary canine along with sexual dimorphism. Thus, the present study intended to evaluate and compare the Mesiodistal dimensions of right and left maxillary canine, Maxillary arch width, Maxillary canine index and standard maxillary canine index in males and females. We studied maxillary canine index on the casts based on Rao., et al. method. The acquired data were analysed using unpaired t- test and chi- square test and P value less than 0.05 was taken significant. Both mesiodistal width of right and left maxillary canine were significantly higher in males than females. Male has significantly higher maxillary arch width. There is no significant difference present between males and females in right and left maxillary canine index. Percentage accuracy for correctly predicting sex by MCI method was more in males compared to females and the difference is highly significant. Right maxillary canine shows more sexual dimorphism than left maxillary canine. odontometric analysis is useful in forensic odontology for determining gender.
Keywords: Maxillary Arch Width; Maxillary Canine Index; Sexual Dimorphism; Standard Maxillary Canine Index; Gender Identification
References
- Dayal Pramod K. “Textbook of forensic odontology”. Paras’ medical publisher, (1998).
- Pereira Treville., et al. "Palatoscopy and odontometrics for sex identification and hereditary pattern analysis in a Navi Mumbai population: A cross-sectional study”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology: JOMFP2 (2018): 271.
- Priya E. "Methods of skeletal age estimation used by forensic anthropologists in adults: a review”. Forensic Research and Criminology International Journal 2 (2017): 00104.
- Nagare Sagar P., et al. "Sex determination in forensic identification, a review”. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences2 (2018): 61.
- Bakkannavar Shankar M., et al. "Mesiodistal width of canines: a tool for sex determination”. Medicine, Science and the Law1 (2012): 22-26.
- Phulari Rashmi GS., et al. "Comparative assessment of maxillary canine index and maxillary first molar dimensions for sex determination in forensic odontology”. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences2 (2017): 110.
- Singh Siddharth Kumar, et al. "Mandibular canine index: A reliable predictor for gender identification using study cast in Indian population”. Indian Journal of Dental Research4 (2015): 396.
- Parekh Dhara H., et al. "Odontometric study of maxillary canine teeth to establish sexual dimorphism in Gujarat population”. International Journal of Biological and Medical Research 3 (2012): 1935-1937.
- Rao Nagesh Kumar G., et al. "Mandibular canine index—a clue for establishing sex identity”. Forensic science international 3 (1989): 249254.
- Garn Stanley M., et al. "Genetic control of sexual dimorphism in tooth size”. Journal of Dental Research5 (1967): 963-972.
- Hashim H A and ZA Murshid. "Mesiodistal tooth width in a Saudi population sample comparing right and left sides. Part 2”. Egyptian Dental Journal1 (1993): 347-350.
- Minzuno O. "Sex determination from maxillary canine by Fourier analysis”. Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry 2 (1990): 139-142.
- El Sheikhi Fatma and Iman Bugaighis. "Sex discrimination by odontometrics in Libyan subjects”. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences2 (2016): 157-164.
- Eboh Dennis Erhisenebe O. "Odontometric sex discrimination in young Urhobo adults of South-South Nigeria”. Anatomy and Cell Biology3 (2019): 269-277.
- Liu Jialin., et al. "Dental measurements based on a three-dimensional digital technique: A comparative study on reliability and validity”. Archives of Oral Biology124 (2021): 105059.
- Sherfudhin H., et al. "A cross‐sectional study of canine dimorphism in establishing sex identity: comparison of two statistical methods”. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation9 (1996): 627-631.
- Al-Rifaiy Mohammed Q., et al. "Dimorphism of mandibular and maxillary canine teeth in establishing sex identity”. Saudi Dental Journal1 (1997): 17-20.
- Bakkannavar Shankar M., et al. "Canine index–A tool for sex determination”. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences4 (2015): 157-161.
- Mohsenpour K., et al. "Mandibular and maxillary canine as a tool for sex determination”. Journal of Morphological Sciences04 (2017): 247-250.
- Nuhu Saleh., et al. "Establishment of sexual dimorphism using maxillary canine of the university of Maiduguri students, Nigeria”. International Journal of Forensic Odontology2 (2019): 68.
- Shastry Shilpa Padar., et al. "Sexual Dimorphism Using Canine Width and Inter-Canine Distance in South Indian Population: A Cross Sectional Study”. (2016).
- Boaz Karen and Chhavi Gupta. "Dimorphism in human maxillary and mandibular canines in establishment of gender”. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences (2009): 42-44.
- Khangura Rajbir Kaur., et al. "Sex determination using mesiodistal dimension of permanent maxillary incisors and canines”. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences2 (2011): 81.
- Lund H and H Mörnstad. "Gender determination by odontometrics in a Swedish population”. The Journal of Forensic Odonto-stomatology2 (1999): 30-34.
- Paramkusam Geetha., et al. "Morphometric analysis of canine in gender determination: Revisited in India”. Indian Journal of Dental Research4 (2014): 425.
Citation
Copyright