Acta Scientific Otolaryngology (ASOL) (ISSN: 2582-5550)

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 12

Impact on Daily Life of an Active Middle Ear Implant

Maria Conceição Peixoto*, Rui Pratas, Cristina Miranda, Mafalda Bento and Victor Correia da Silva

Auditory Implant Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Cuf Porto Hospital, Portugal

*Corresponding Author: Maria Conceição Peixoto, Auditory Implant Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Cuf Porto Hospital, Portugal.

Received: October 15, 2022; Published: November 24, 2022


Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a totally implantable active middle ear implant in quality of life of the implanted patients taking into account their hearing performance.

Methods: Retrospective observational nonrandomized group study. Settings: Private hospital. From March 2018 and September 2019, all the participant with minimum 6 months’ experience with the Carina system were evaluated. The evaluation was performed using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire.

Results: Nine patients complete the entire questionnaire. A reduction of difficulties was seen in quiet environments/ease of communication (32.8% vs 54.3%), in background noise environments (42.8% vs 62.3%) and in environments with reverberation (38.7% vs 63.9%) in the patient with the active middle ear implant when compared to the unaided condition. In what concerned the trouble caused by unpleasant sounds/Aversiveness, an increased discomfort was described with de middle ear implant compared to the unaided condition (50.3% vs 32.8%).

Conclusion: Active middle ear implants seem to improve auditory perception in daily activities, even in difficult conditions like background noise or reverberation environments, although statistically significant conclusions cannot be achieved due to the small sample size. APHAB demonstrated to be a potential useful tool in this evaluation.

Keywords: Active Middle Ear Prosthesis; Carina Implant; Middle Ear Transducer; Quality of Life; Hearing


  1. Seidman MD., et al. “Totally implantable active middle ear implants”. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 52 (2019): 297-309.
  2. Savas VA., et al. “Comparison of Carina active middle-ear implant with conventional hearing aids for mixed hearing loss”. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 130 (2016): 340-343.
  3. “Constitution Word Health organization” (2020).
  4. Fleck MPA., et al. “Desenvolvimento da versão em português do instrumento de avaliação de qualidade de vida da OMS (WHOQOL-100)”. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry 21 (1999): 19-28.
  5. Cohen C., et al. “Saúde mental, crime e justiça”. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo (2006).
  6. “WHOQOL: Measuring Quality of Life” (2020).
  7. David F., et al. “Multi-Attribute Health Status Classification Systems: Health Utilities Index”. Pharmacoeconomics 7 (1995): 490-502.
  8. Ware J. “SF-36 Health Survey Update”. Spine 24 (2000): 3130-3139.
  9. Abrams HB., et al. “Health-related quality of life and hearing aids: a tutorial”. Trends in Amplification 9 (2005): 99-109.
  10. Johnson J., et al. “APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids”. Ear Hearing 31 (2010): 47-55.
  11. Cox RM. “The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) – Administration and Application”. Phonak Focus (1996): 21.
  12. Cox RM. “Administration and application of the APHAB”. Hearing Journal 50 (1997): 32-48.
  13. Peixoto MC., et al. “Active Middle Ear Implant Patient Outcomes with Adaptive Feedback Canceller”. Otology and Neurotology3 (2021): 372-376.
  14. Bergner M., et al. “The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure”. Medical Care 19 (1981): 787-805.
  15. Humes LE., et al. “Reliability and stability of various hearing-aid outcome measures in a group of elderly hearing-aid wearers”. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 39 (1996): 923-935.
  16. Chisolm TH and Abrams HB. “Measuring hearing aid benefit using a willingness-to-pay approach”. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 12 (2001): 383-3839.
  17. Peixoto MC., et al. “The first results of a totally implanted active middle ear device”. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10 (2019): 2775-2781.
  18. Reinhart PN., et al. “Effects of Reverberation and Compression on Consonant Identification in Individuals with Hearing Impairment”. Ear Hearing2 (2016): 144-152.
  19. Pulcherio JB., et al. “Carina and Esteem: A Systematic Review of Fully Implantable Hearing Devices”. PLoS One 9 (2005):


Citation: Maria Conceição Peixoto., et al. “Impact on Daily Life of an Active Middle Ear Implant".Acta Scientific Otolaryngology 4.12 (2022): 24-28.


Copyright: © 2022 Maria Conceição Peixoto., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Acceptance rate34%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor0.871

Indexed In

News and Events

  • Certification for Review
    Acta Scientific certifies the Editors/reviewers for their review done towards the assigned articles of the respective journals.
  • Submission Timeline for Upcoming Issue
    The last date for submission of articles for regular Issues is May 30, 2024.
  • Publication Certificate
    Authors will be issued a "Publication Certificate" as a mark of appreciation for publishing their work.
  • Best Article of the Issue
    The Editors will elect one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of this article will be provided with a certificate of "Best Article of the Issue"
  • Welcoming Article Submission
    Acta Scientific delightfully welcomes active researchers for submission of articles towards the upcoming issue of respective journals.

Contact US