Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (ASMS)(ISSN: 2582-0931)

Research Article Volume 10 Issue 5

In Silico Identification of Opuntia ficus-indica Phytochemicals as Potential EGFR Kinase Inhibitors in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, and MM-PBSA Analyses

Mujahid M Almuqati1*, Rayan A Alghamdi1 and Isam M Abu Zeid1,2,3

1Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University,
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
2Centre of Excellence in Bionanoscience, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi
Arabia
3Princess Dr. Najla Bint Saud Al-Saud Center for Excellence Research in
Biotechnology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding Author: Mujahid M Almuqati, Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Received: April 07, 2026; Published: May 07, 2026


Objective: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a clinically validated therapeutic target in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and plant-derived phytochemicals may provide diverse lead scaffolds; thus, this study aimed to evaluate six bioactive compounds from Opuntia ficus-indica as potential EGFR kinase inhibitors in silico.

Methods: Compounds were docked into the EGFR kinase domain (PDB ID: 1XKK) using molecular docking, and the top-ranked ligands were further assessed by 100-ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and MM-PBSA binding free-energy calculations; the docking protocol was validated by redocking the co-crystallized ligand and computing RMSD.

Results: Docking indicated favorable accommodation within the ATP-binding pocket, with nicotiflorin (−9.43 kcal/mol), rutin (−9.11 kcal/mol), and quercetin (−8.91 kcal/mol) selected for MD/MM-PBSA, showing interactions with key ATP-site residues (e.g., Met793 and Lys745) and additional contacts including Cys797 (nicotiflorin/rutin) and Asp855 (quercetin); redocking achieved a heavy-atom RMSD of 1.268 Å, MD trajectories showed stable backbone behavior (RMSD ~0.14–0.31 nm) and maintained compactness (Rg ~1.93–2.04 nm), hydrogen-bond persistence was highest for rutin (average ~7.13; max 12) versus nicotiflorin (~4.55; max 9) and quercetin (~2.30; max 5), and MM-PBSA estimated ΔTOTAL values of −36.70 ± 5.52 (rutin), −25.58 ± 5.07 (nicotiflorin), and −23.17 ± 3.18 kcal/mol (quercetin), with favorable van der Waals/electrostatics partially offset by polar solvation and stabilized by non-polar solvation.

Conclusion: The combined docking–MD–MM-PBSA findings nominate rutin, nicotiflorin, and quercetin as the most promising Opuntia ficus-indica –derived EGFR-binding candidates in silico and support subsequent experimental validation in enzymatic and cell-based EGFR assays.

Keywords: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Opuntia ficus-indica; Molecular Docking; Molecular Dynamics Simulation

References

  1. Tan AC., et al. “Targeted therapies for lung cancer patients with oncogenic driver molecular alterations”. Journal of Clinical Oncology6 (2022): 611-625.
  2. Zhang YL., et al. “The prevalence of EGFR mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis”. Oncotarget 48 (2016): 78985.
  3. Shi Y., et al. “A prospective, molecular epidemiology study of EGFR mutations in Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology (pioneer)”. Journal of Thoracal Oncology2 (2014): 154-162.
  4. Adib E., et al. “Variation in targetable genomic alterations in non-small cell lung cancer by genetic ancestry, sex, smoking history, and histology”. Genome Medicine1 (2022): 39.
  5. Miura K., et al. “Ancestry-, sex-, and age-based differences of gene alterations in NSCLC: From the real-world data of cancer genomic profiling tests”. JNCCN 7 (2024).
  6. Siegel RL., et al. “Cancer statistics, 2025”. CA Cancer Journal of Clinics1 (2025): 10.
  7. Hill W., et al. “Lung adenocarcinoma promotion by air pollutants”. Nature 7955 (2023): 159-167.
  8. Marmitt DJ., et al. “Renisus plants and their potential antitumor effects in clinical trials and registered patents”. Nutritional Cancer10 (2021): 1821-1848.
  9. Yurt Kilcar A., et al. “In vitro evaluation of radiolabeled (125I) methanol extracts of yarrow in cell lines of MCF-7, PC-3, A-549 and Caco-2”. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry1 (2012): 593-599.
  10. Memarzia A., et al. “Therapeutic effects of medicinal plants and their constituents on lung cancer, in vitro, in vivo and clinical evidence”. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine19 (2023): 2841-2863.
  11. Zhiyuan HU., et al. “Hyperoside exhibits anticancer activity in non small cell lung cancer cells with T790M mutations by upregulating FoxO1 via CCAT1”. Oncology Report2 (2020): 617-624.
  12. Qu H., et al. “Structural characterization of a polysaccharide from the flower buds of Tussilago farfara, and its effect on proliferation and apoptosis of A549 human non-small lung cancer cell line”. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 113 (2018): 849-858.
  13. Yu PP., et al. “Millifolide a, a dimeric ether of degraded sesquiterpene lactones, inhibited the proliferation of human lung cancer cell line A549”. Natural Product Research11 (2022): 2875-2877.
  14. Chen WT., et al. “Hyperforin suppresses tumor growth and NF-κB-mediated anti-apoptotic and invasive potential of non-small cell lung cancer”. Anticancer Research4 (2018): 2161-2167.
  15. Taşkonak B., et al. “Hypericin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles for enhanced photodynamic therapy in A549 lung cancer cells”. BioNanoScience2 (2023): 352-364.
  16. Zhu L hua., et al. “Cycloastragenol induces apoptosis and protective autophagy through AMPK/ULK1/mTOR axis in human non-small cell lung cancer cell lines”. Journal of Integrative Medicine4 (2024): 503-514.
  17. Qu H., et al. “ Structural characterization of a polysaccharide from the flower buds of Tussilago farfara, and its effect on proliferation and apoptosis of A549 human non-small lung cancer cell line”. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 113 (2018): 849-858.
  18. Memarzia A., et al. “Therapeutic effects of medicinal plants and their constituents on lung cancer, in vitro, in vivo and clinical evidence”. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine19 (2023): 2841-2863.
  19. Nam DG., et al. “The cactus (Opuntiathecus-indica) cladodes and callus extracts: A study combined with LC-MS metabolic profiling, in-silico, and in-vitro analyses”. Antioxidants 7 (2023): 1329.
  20. Alholy T., et al. “Biosynthesis of magnesium oxide nanoparticles using Opunita ficus-indica and their antifungal effect against Aspergillus niger”. Journal of Research in Pharmacy 3 (2023): 1188-1201.
  21. El-Mostafa K., et al. “Nopal cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) as a source of bioactive compounds for nutrition, health and disease”. Molecules 9 (2014): 14879-14901.
  22. Trott O., et al. “Autodock vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading”. Journal of Computational Chemistry2 (2010): 455-461.
  23. Eberhardt J., et al. “Autodock vina 1.2.0: New docking methods, expanded force field, and python bindings”. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling8 (2021): 3891-3898.
  24. Bekker H., et al. “Gromacs-a parallel computer for molecular-dynamics simulations in 4th international conference on computational physics (PC 92)”. WSPC (1993): 252-256.
  25. Berendsen HJC., et al. “Gromacs: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation”. Computer Physics Communications1-3 (1995): 43-56.
  26. Lindahl E., et al. “Gromacs 3.0: A package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis”. Journal of Molecular Modeling8 (2007): 306-317.
  27. Van Der Spoel D., et al. “Gromacs: Fast, flexible, and free”. Journal of Computational Chemistry16 (2006): 1701-1718.
  28. Hess B., et al. “Gromacs 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation”. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation3 (2008): 435-447.
  29. Pronk S., et al. “Gromacs 4.5: A high-throughput and highly parallel open-source molecular simulation toolkit”. Bioinformatics7 (2013): 845-854.
  30. Páll S., et al. “Tackling exascale software challenges in molecular dynamics simulations with gromacs”. Lecture Notes in Computer Science LNCS 8759 (2015): 23-27.
  31. Abraham MJ., et al. “Gromacs: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers”. Software X 1-2 (2015): 19-25.
  32. Miller BR., et al. “MMPBSA.py: An efficient program for end-state free energy calculations”. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation9 (2012): 3314-3321.
  33. Valdés-Tresanco MS., et al. “gmx_MMPBSA: A new tool to perform end-state free energy calculations with gromacs”. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation10 (2021): 6281-6291.
  34. Roberts SK., et al. “Targeting mutant EGFR in non-small cell lung cancer in the context of cell adaptation and resistance”. Drug Discovery Today7 (2025): 104407.
  35. Galdadas I., et al. “Structural basis of the effect of activating mutations on the EGF receptor”. Elife 10 (2021).
  36. Rocchetti G., et al. “Italian Opuntia ficus-indica cladodes as rich source of bioactive compounds with health-promoting properties”. Foods2 (2018): 24.
  37. El-Mostafa K., et al. “Nopal cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) as a source of bioactive compounds for nutrition, health and disease”. Molecules9 (2014): 14879-14901.
  38. de Oliveira TA., et al. “Evaluation of docking machine learning and molecular dynamics methodologies for DNA-ligand systems”. Pharmaceuticals 2 (2022): 132.
  39. Trott O., et al. “Autodock vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization and multithreading”. Journal of Computational Chemistry2 (2010): 455.
  40. Roberts SK., et al. “Targeting mutant EGFR in non-small cell lung cancer in the context of cell adaptation and resistance”. Drug Discovery Today 7 (2025): 104407.
  41. Amelia T., et al. “Structural insight and development of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors”. Molecules 3 (2022): 819.
  42. Patil BR., et al. “Exploring the structural activity relationship of the osimertinib: A covalent inhibitor of double mutant EGFRL858R/T790M tyrosine kinase for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)”. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry 109 (2024).
  43. Amelia T., et al. “Structural insight and development of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors”. Molecules 3 (2022): 819.
  44. Huang J., et al. “CHARMM36 all-atom additive protein force field: Validation based on comparison to NMR data”. Journal of Computational Chemistry25 (2013): 2135-2145.
  45. Abraham MJ., et al. “Gromacs: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers”. SoftwareX 1-2 (2015): 19-25.
  46. El-Mostafa K., et al. “Nopal cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) as a source of bioactive compounds for nutrition, health and disease”. Molecules9 (2014): 14879-901.
  47. Rocchetti G., et al. “Italian Opuntia ficus-indica Cladodes as Rich Source of Bioactive Compounds with Health-Promoting Properties”. Foods2 (2018): 24.
  48. Valdés-Tresanco MS., et al. “gmx_MMPBSA: A new tool to perform end-state free energy calculations with gromacs”. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation10 (2021): 6281-6291.
  49. Genheden S., et al. “The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities”. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 5 (2015): 449.
  50. Liu Y., et al. “Quercetin attenuates podocyte apoptosis of diabetic nephropathy through targeting EGFR Signaling”. Frontiers in Pharmacology 12 (2022): 792777.
  51. Huang YT., et al. “Effects of luteolin and quercetin, inhibitors of tyrosine kinase, on cell growth and metastasis-associated properties in A431 cells overexpressing epidermal growth factor receptor”. British Journal of Pharmacology5 (1999): 999-1010.
  52. Galdadas I., et al. “Structural basis of the effect of activating mutations on the EGF receptor”. Elife 10 (2025).
  53. Genheden S., et al. “The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities”. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery5 (2015): 449.

Citation

Citation: Mujahid M Almuqati., et al. “In Silico Identification of Opuntia ficus-indica Phytochemicals as Potential EGFR Kinase Inhibitors in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, and MM-PBSA Analyses". Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 10.5 (2026): 31-41.

Copyright

Copyright: © 2026 Mujahid M Almuqati., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




Metrics

Acceptance rate30%
Acceptance to publication20-30 days
Impact Factor1.403

Indexed In





Contact US